US Election 2020

[Tero]

"Wikipedia was briefly updated to list Bloomberg's death on February 19, 2019(sic), cause of death: Senator Elizabeth Warren." LOL

[Cunt]

Conspiracy theorists still say the Russians swung the 2016 election in Trump's favour.

They insist that the Russians are going to help him steal 2020.

So many holes in that story...first off, were they on vacation during 2018?

More important, why would Putin want Trump over Sanders? Trump sanctions Russia, arms their enemies in Ukraine, and bullied Putin into suppressing the infamous 'pee-pee tape'x.

Other than pee pee tape, Read the Mueller report.

Everyone read the Mueller report who had the power to act on it.

The 'pee-pee' tape, as well as all other 'damning evidence' seems to exist only in the imaginings of conspiracy theorists.

If you find a copy of that peepee tape, I may change my mind, but for now, I side with the less fantastical theories.

Speaking of which, does anyone think the new evidence being brought in via Giuliani will help, or hurt Biden? Or is he still a (seriously? lol) threat to Trump ?

[Tero]

Pee pee tape is now history

Election reduced to two things:
1 love/hate Trump
For democrats: just get rid of him
2 healthcare

Trump has to address both. Otherwise he will not get elected.

[Cunt]

Believes in QAnon while claiming that US intelligence agencies are 'conspiracy theorists.'

Well, qanon is such a large, diverse group that you aren't making enough sense...

Are you sure you don't mean Q? Or maybe Q+?

I certainly don't 'believe' any of the (three distinctly different) entities.

What I DO believe, is that Q and Q+ are...hmmm...how to best put this...

'Deliberate Republican Leaks'

Not 'true stories', but if you read a story that cites vague sources, treat them as carefully as you would a 'Q post', and you won't be far wrong.

If, alternately, you 'believe' stories pitched with 'sources close to the White House confirm', you are being led with similarly strong 'sources' as qanon might.

Cites RT but is apparently unaware that RT regularly puts out material supporting Trump. Not to mention television shows in Russia that also regularly praise Trump (an instance, but there are plenty of them).

I'm not sure who 'RT' is, but it does seem that Russia would prefer a Moscow-holidaying communist-loving candidate (Sanders) over one who has demonstrated a willingness to oppose Russias allies (such as Iran) and to arm their enemies (Ukraine)

If you want to spout nonsense about Q/Q+/Qanon, why not at least learn what the difference is first?

Unless you had a reason to speak ill of it, without knowing...that would be weird...

[Tero]

This week polls

[Cunt]

What the HELL is so wrong with Gabbard? She seemed decent enough. Did she shit her pants or something?

[Tero]

She's a Russian asset, says Hillary.

[Cunt]

It's the go-to of the ranting conspiracy theorist.

I think the 'russia russia russia' accusations are a secretly chinese conspiracy.

[Tero]

[Tero]

Here we go! We are launching Sanders and Dumping Biden. Thanks Trump for getting us socialism.

[Cunt]

Here we go! We are launching Sanders and Dumping Biden. Thanks Trump for getting us socialism.

Won't the DNC just cheat again? Not much to stop them...

[Cunt]

Bernie is finished.

His paid staff on camera calling for gulags? Nope. That didn't finish him.

Nor was it the early-life communist connections. Nor the three houses, not the trophy wife either.

Nope, it's this one simple vid. It's over for Bernie. The DNC doesn't even have to ruin him now.

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

[Tero]

One MSNBC host goes all centrist:
MSNBC host Chris Matthews wondered if the Democratic Party would be better off if President Trump wins reelection rather than if Sen. Bernie Sanders takes over the White House.

Matthews, 74, brought up the possibility that centrist Democrats may prefer Trump over the socialist Sanders during the network's Saturday afternoon coverage of the Nevada caucuses. The host of Hardball with Chris Matthews was leading a conversation about how centrist candidates were splitting the vote, likely a detriment to one another but a benefit for Sanders.

"I’m wondering whether the Democratic moderates want Bernie Sanders to be president," he said. "That’s maybe too exciting a question to raise. They don’t like Trump at all. Do they want Bernie Sanders to take over the Democratic Party in perpetuity? I mean, he takes it over, he sets the direction of the future of the party — maybe they’d rather wait four years and put in a Democrat that they like."

"I mean, that’s the big question, right?" Adrienne Elrod, a former senior adviser to Hillary Clinton, responded. "And you know, the narrative that you’re starting to see play out, Chris, is that there are people that are concerned, strategists that are concerned that Bernie Sanders being at the top of the ticket will force us to lose the House. I don’t necessarily think that’s the case."

Matthews has frequently disparaged the Vermont senator in recent days, accusing Sanders of being "full of it" and arguing that he'd be a "miserable president" if he got elected. He has also predicted that Sanders would lose 49 states if he went up against Trump in the general election.

The network host also warned his viewers about candidates who support socialism.

[Tero]

Here we go! We are launching Sanders and Dumping Biden. Thanks Trump for getting us socialism.

Won't the DNC just cheat again? Not much to stop them...

I dunno. It is not going to be nice if they dump Bernie twice. Good thing Bernie is not a Democrat. We can then go ahead with an all new party. The Republicans did it, they are no longer the party of Lincoln.

[Cunt]

Heard a podcast recently where Mike Rowe told a story about him...
https://www.battlefields.org/learn/arti ... colns-duel