Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:54 am
He seems to assume we're fans of the billionaire press and all adored Epstein too.
Nope. I assume you are outraged by the plain abuse of children by the wealthy, in public, under the protection of government.
With that being the case, I wonder which of your trusted news sources has dug into who the customers are. Unless of course they are ALL biased somehow, against revealing the information.
To me, those who (like ABC/Disney) had clear connections to him, should be assumed to be working to conceal the truth for reasons they have not offered. It makes the rest of what they say highly suspect.
If I had to guess, I would guess that you would merrily reveal ALL the customers, while trying to protect the victims as much as practical.
So if you assume I am treating you as fans of Maxell (and her little bitch Epstein) you assumed wrong. What else might you be wrong about?
That story is one of the ones that shows media bias very clearly. It shouldn't be contentious at all to think ill of those who participate in hiding the customers.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists
Joe wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.