All Things Trump: Is it over yet?

[Cunt]

Attention, attention will operative Cunt return immediately to Moscow as he is becoming unstable and losing brain cells.

This is the 'Trump' thread.

The Russians are more connected to Hillary. You must be lost. The thread of Democrats is over there.

[Svartalf]

he's not losing anything, ye canna lose what ye ne'er had in the first place.

[Scot Dutchy]

Very true in his case how stupid of me.

[JimC]

So she is not anti-Semitic? I thought that, and her personal history, were bad enough that even malicious, bigoted genocidal idiots wouldn't rush in to defend her.

Of course, that IS God tweeting though.

Criticising Israel and/or American politicians who lobby for it is not, in itself, being anti-semitic. The clue is often in the language - when people start using the words "... the Jews", then they're generally heading in the anti-semitic direction...

[Cunt]

So she is not anti-Semitic? I thought that, and her personal history, were bad enough that even malicious, bigoted genocidal idiots wouldn't rush in to defend her.

Of course, that IS God tweeting though.

Criticising Israel and/or American politicians who lobby for it is not, in itself, being anti-semitic. The clue is often in the language - when people start using the words "... the Jews", then they're generally heading in the anti-semitic direction...

Idiots AND JimC, I guess.

[Tero]

CNN
If Trump signs off on the deal, he gets far less border wall funding than he initially demanded, in the immediate, but he wins critical credibility for the Republicans' unsubstantiated and false claims of a border security crisis. Worse, by conceding to the wall in any form, Democrats have yielded to a monument of a violent, racist ideology. "The just-below-the-surface message is this," wrote CNN's Chris Cillizza about Trump's "dog whistle" rhetoric on immigration and the border. "White people made this country great. Brown people are flooding in."

[Cunt]

CNN
If Trump signs off on the deal, he gets far less border wall funding than he initially demanded, in the immediate, but he wins critical credibility for the Republicans' unsubstantiated and false claims of a border security crisis. Worse, by conceding to the wall in any form, Democrats have yielded to a monument of a violent, racist ideology. "The just-below-the-surface message is this," wrote CNN's Chris Cillizza about Trump's "dog whistle" rhetoric on immigration and the border. "White people made this country great. Brown people are flooding in."

Well, if you are an asshole pushing an agenda, it would sound like that.

If you are rational, it would sound like 'lawful immigration is better than unlawful immigration'.

Of course, an asshole pushing an agenda wouldn't consider the flood of illegal immigrants a problem, as long as it could be spun to make Trump look bad.

[Animavore]

Trump rips fact-checkers: 'Some of the most dishonest people in media'

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4295 ... 0J_mDfjdBI

[Jason]

So she is not anti-Semitic? I thought that, and her personal history, were bad enough that even malicious, bigoted genocidal idiots wouldn't rush in to defend her.

Of course, that IS God tweeting though.

Criticising Israel and/or American politicians who lobby for it is not, in itself, being anti-semitic. The clue is often in the language - when people start using the words "... the Jews", then they're generally heading in the anti-semitic direction...

But which Jews? There is a huge divide between the North American Jewry and the Israeli stripe - many of whom are open to criticism of Israel under Didi as well.

[Tero]

Trump messing with Congress to last minute, as usual
FOXNEWS
Lawmakers have until 11:59 p.m. Friday to get the agreement through both houses of Congress and signed by Trump before several Cabinet-level departments shut down and hundreds of thousands of federal workers are furloughed in what would be the second partial government shutdown this year.

When asked Wednesday if they had an agreement that Trump would approve, Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, told reporters: "We think so. We hope so."

But on Wednesday, the president remained noncommittal about signing.

“Well, we haven’t gotten it yet,” Trump told reporters at the White House. “We’ll be getting it and we’ll be looking for land mines — because you could have that.”

[Seabass]

The next US president? 42 will support him reluctantly at first, but will eventually come around to understanding his brilliance.

[pErvinalia]

Wandering eye. Can't be trusted.

[tattuchu]

What an absolutely magnificent specimen.

[Brian Peacock]

CNN
If Trump signs off on the deal, he gets far less border wall funding than he initially demanded, in the immediate, but he wins critical credibility for the Republicans' unsubstantiated and false claims of a border security crisis. Worse, by conceding to the wall in any form, Democrats have yielded to a monument of a violent, racist ideology. "The just-below-the-surface message is this," wrote CNN's Chris Cillizza about Trump's "dog whistle" rhetoric on immigration and the border. "White people made this country great. Brown people are flooding in."

Well, if you are an asshole pushing an agenda, it would sound like that.

If you are rational, it would sound like 'lawful immigration is better than unlawful immigration'.

Of course, an asshole pushing an agenda wouldn't consider the flood of illegal immigrants a problem, as long as it could be spun to make Trump look bad.

What flood? Legal and illegal entry into the US has been falling for 10 years. It's barely a trickle now. Hermit posted the US government's own figures on this already (I think twice), there was even a graph. Nobody noticed. Flood, tidal wave, tsunami, hordes, invading armies, rapists, murders, terrorists; all these are emotive terms aimed purely at providing a post hoc justification.

[pErvinalia]

Cunt doesn't do evidence. He only does feelings.