DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60733
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by pErvinalia » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:47 am

Well, for a start, he wasn't talking to you. Are you off your medication lately??
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Seth » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:54 am

The_Metatron wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
The_Metatron wrote:
Snip
How come you suspended me for just asking a question, 'are you a retard' to shurnk? He/she could have just answered 'no' and that would have been acceptable. You are no 'Blip' that's for sure.
Are you some sort of stupid inbred motherfucker?
Takes one to know one, I asked your mother about that and she blushed and declined to answer, and the answer is "no." See how easy that was?
Get it now? Did it seem like I was really interested in your intellectual capacity, lineage, or sexual habits? Or, did that seem like a personal attack?
Seemed like pinheaded stupidity on your part to me, and rather amusing given the context.
All I did was substitute the words "some sort of stupid inbred motherfucker" for the words "a retard".
Which made the statement a slightly longer inquiry with more specificity to which the proper response is either "no" or no response at all. Only a fucking pussy with no self-control would consider such a hyperbolic and sarcastic question to be intended seriously as an insult. Only fucking pussies with the intellects of a flea and the self-control of a pedophile in a room full of ten year-olds would misuse a position of power to declare such a statement to be a personal attack, much less ban someone for it.

Stick that up your ass and smoke it.
If you want to express incredulity, there are better ways to do it.
Are you a retard or something? It's a perfect way to express incredulity and ask someone a perfectly reasonable question.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Seth » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:56 am

rEvolutionist wrote:Well, for a start, he wasn't talking to you. Are you off your medication lately??
Anything said here is said to everyone and anyone else has a perfect right to respond to it as if directed at them. If you want to keep your comments personal, then PM them. Otherwise shut the fuck up and let the adults talk.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60733
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by pErvinalia » Sun Jun 22, 2014 11:35 am

Seth wrote:
The_Metatron wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
The_Metatron wrote:
Snip
How come you suspended me for just asking a question, 'are you a retard' to shurnk? He/she could have just answered 'no' and that would have been acceptable. You are no 'Blip' that's for sure.
Are you some sort of stupid inbred motherfucker?
Takes one to know one, I asked your mother about that and she blushed and declined to answer, and the answer is "no." See how easy that was?
Get it now? Did it seem like I was really interested in your intellectual capacity, lineage, or sexual habits? Or, did that seem like a personal attack?
Seemed like pinheaded stupidity on your part to me, and rather amusing given the context.
All I did was substitute the words "some sort of stupid inbred motherfucker" for the words "a retard".
Which made the statement a slightly longer inquiry with more specificity to which the proper response is either "no" or no response at all. Only a fucking pussy with no self-control would consider such a hyperbolic and sarcastic question to be intended seriously as an insult. Only fucking pussies with the intellects of a flea and the self-control of a pedophile in a room full of ten year-olds would misuse a position of power to declare such a statement to be a personal attack, much less ban someone for it.

Stick that up your ass and smoke it.
If you want to express incredulity, there are better ways to do it.
Are you a retard or something? It's a perfect way to express incredulity and ask someone a perfectly reasonable question.
Enjoy your upcoming holiday, Sith.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60733
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by pErvinalia » Sun Jun 22, 2014 11:37 am

Seth wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:Well, for a start, he wasn't talking to you. Are you off your medication lately??
Anything said here is said to everyone and anyone else has a perfect right to respond to it as if directed at them. If you want to keep your comments personal, then PM them. Otherwise shut the fuck up and let the adults talk.
His question was directed to Dave personally. When you answer it, you come across as confused. Which is probably apt...
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Jun 22, 2014 2:36 pm

Scott1328 wrote:rEv was banned for creating a sock puppet while suspended. I urge you to do the same
How did they find out as he his the master sock puppeteer?
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Jun 22, 2014 2:42 pm

The_Metatron wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
The_Metatron wrote:
Snip
How come you suspended me for just asking a question, 'are you a retard' to shurnk? He/she could have just answered 'no' and that would have been acceptable. You are no 'Blip' that's for sure.
Are you some sort of stupid inbred motherfucker?

Get it now? Did it seem like I was really interested in your intellectual capacity, lineage, or sexual habits? Or, did that seem like a personal attack?

All I did was substitute the words "some sort of stupid inbred motherfucker" for the words "a retard".

If you want to express incredulity, there are better ways to do it.
Why yes I am, thanks for asking. You see insults aren't really a problem for adults. Though I do accept it is against the rules I just think they are not applied fairly.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Jun 22, 2014 2:45 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:rEv was banned for creating a sock puppet while suspended. I urge you to do the same
:hehe:
What would be the point as I'm not longer suspended.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Scott1328 » Sun Jun 22, 2014 4:08 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:rEv was banned for creating a sock puppet while suspended. I urge you to do the same
How did they find out as he his the master sock puppeteer?
I don't know; anyway it is moot, since rEv has admitted to creating socks in any number of these RatSkep whine threads.
DaveDodo007 wrote:What would be the point as I'm not longer suspended.
Well, keep it in mind for the next time you get suspended.

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Gallstones » Sun Jun 22, 2014 5:40 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:Or it was a personal attack and he got a warning for breaking the FUA. Crazy, I know...
For someone who has been banned from ratskep for having a different opinion from the horde, you sure do like to defend them when someone of a different political stance calls into question their moderation policies. You are showing yourself to be nothing but an ideologue who will support anybody who agrees with your political position. In case you need reminding this isn't very skeptical, intelligent or using free thought. You can choose to be religious or an ideologue or a rationalist but if you don't choose the later then you are no better than any you insult.
Dave, surely you've got enough brain cells to see that you break the FUA over there repeatedly?? There's no conspiracy. You post like a drunken maniac. What do you expect is going to happen?
Has anyone else's irony meter just exploded?
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Hermit » Sun Jun 22, 2014 5:51 pm

Gallstones wrote:Has anyone else's irony meter just exploded?
Actually, yes. :irony:
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Mr.Samsa
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:06 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Mr.Samsa » Sun Jun 22, 2014 7:53 pm

The_Metatron wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
The_Metatron wrote:
Snip
How come you suspended me for just asking a question, 'are you a retard' to shurnk? He/she could have just answered 'no' and that would have been acceptable. You are no 'Blip' that's for sure.
Are you some sort of stupid inbred motherfucker?

Get it now? Did it seem like I was really interested in your intellectual capacity, lineage, or sexual habits? Or, did that seem like a personal attack?

All I did was substitute the words "some sort of stupid inbred motherfucker" for the words "a retard".

If you want to express incredulity, there are better ways to do it.
Whilst you're here, do you feel like explaining how: "The point is that the fact that you made that statement demonstrates that you are a little out of your depth." is inflammatory?
“The real question is not whether machines think but whether men do. The mystery which surrounds a thinking machine already surrounds a thinking man.” - B. F. Skinner.

User avatar
The_Metatron
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:12 pm
About me: Humanist, rationalist, atheist, vegan (mostly). Correctly opinionated on most things.
Location: Oregon
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by The_Metatron » Sun Jun 22, 2014 8:44 pm

No, I don't. Bring your whining up in an appeal. Or, keep posting as you like. Take your chances. Do you really need grown up guidance?

Like I asked at RS, if you hate it so much there, why do you keep going back for more?
My blog, Skepdick.eu

"If a human disagrees with you, let him live. In a hundred billion galaxies, you will not find another." - Carl Sagan

User avatar
Mr.Samsa
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:06 am
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by Mr.Samsa » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:33 pm

The_Metatron wrote:No, I don't. Bring your whining up in an appeal.
I think this exemplifies the mods perfectly - any questioning of their decision is "whining".

And I have appealed it but you guys are still doing that thing where you ignore my pm's and only respond with non informative template responses.
The_Metatron wrote:or, keep posting as you like. Take your chances. Do you really need grown up guidance?
If I needed grown up guidance then I wouldn't be asking a child for it.

The point is that you guys have a set of rules that only you understand, it would help if you let others in on what they mean to you.
The_Metatron wrote:like I asked at RS, if you hate it so much there, why do you keep going back for more?
Who the fuck said I hate it there? Why would I bother trying so hard to understand how you're interpreting the rules so that I can stay within them or starting feedback threads to improve mod actions and the fua if I hated the place?

Think next time before posting.

User avatar
piscator
Posts: 4725
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:11 am
Location: The Big BSOD
Contact:

Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

Post by piscator » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:50 pm

Well, something's a little fucked up when you two assholes have to come here to snivel and taunt. :whistle:

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests