Muslims win again on 911 - Obama happy!

[Pappa]

Cool.

[kiki5711]

I swear listening to this guy gives me the shits. I can't stand his voice! It's like scratching the black board type of nasty. Lying bastard.

[Cunt]

Did anyone else hear "Let us plant our flag in the rubble or our adherents will kill Americans in the 'Muslim World'"?

[Feck]

Did anyone else hear "Let us plant our flag in the rubble or our adherents will kill Americans in the 'Muslim World'"?

No I didn't .

[sandinista]

yah

Not for real..

if true...even worse.

That's right, sandinista, it's bad, and if it's not bad, it's worse.

what the fuck does that mean? If he's pretending to be a christian it's worse than being one was my point.

[Cunt]

Did anyone else hear "Let us plant our flag in the rubble or our adherents will kill Americans in the 'Muslim World'"?

No I didn't .

I think the formal way to point out this particular logical fallacy is 'appeal to consequences', but what he said was that if the plan didn't go his way, there would be trouble in the Muslim world. I think he even mentioned specifically trouble for Americans.

Sounded like the usual candy-coated threatening bullshit to me.

o-o-o-o

yah

Not for real..

if true...even worse.

That's right, sandinista, it's bad, and if it's not bad, it's worse.

what the fuck does that mean?

It means that I found your negativity predictable.

If he's pretending to be a christian it's worse than being one was my point.

So you would (by supporting ALF) have no problem with sneaking around and vandalizing property to promote a good cause (like yours) but would frown direly on someone who lied about their belief in a climate quite hostile to all non-believers?
If your goals came to include taking political power in the US, how enthusiastically would you promote your worldview? Does it conflict with the main one (Christianity)? (oops - I almost assumed you were an atheist)

[sandinista]

it's worse than being one was my point.

So you would (by supporting ALF) have no problem with sneaking around and vandalizing property to promote a good cause (like yours) but would frown direly on someone who lied about their belief in a climate quite hostile to all non-believers?
If your goals came to include taking political power in the US, how enthusiastically would you promote your worldview? Does it conflict with the main one (Christianity)? (oops - I almost assumed you were an atheist)

[JimC]

I'm not sure that pretending to be a christian is worse than being one - it would depend on the version of christianity involved, the reasons for pretending and the circumstances of the individual.

Anyway, I suspect there are a huge number of nominal christians whose faith isn't quite a pretence, but is filed a long way to the back of their mind in most situations...

"By their fruits ye shall know them"...

(thus proving once again that the devil can quote scripture... )

[Gawdzilla Sama]

But does it have to be taken to the Supreme Court for that to be enforced?

Prior rulings of the Supremes would be cited if there's an issue. Precedent setting cases are a constitutional lawyer's bread-and-butter.

[Cunt]

it's worse than being one was my point.

So you would (by supporting ALF) have no problem with sneaking around and vandalizing property to promote a good cause (like yours) but would frown direly on someone who lied about their belief in a climate quite hostile to all non-believers?
If your goals came to include taking political power in the US, how enthusiastically would you promote your worldview? Does it conflict with the main one (Christianity)? (oops - I almost assumed you were an atheist)

When you say 'how dumb that is', do you mean your efforts at quoting? Or your efforts at supporting your position?

[sandinista]

neither, the dumb refers to your lame attempt to justify obama's "faith" or, worse "pretend faith" by...well...dumb because you make no sense.

[Trolldor]

Are you sure it doesn't refer to your incomprehensible ramblings? The idea that you are somehow making a valid point by calling it "dumb" and your reasoning is "because" can only be considered... entertaining at best.

[sandinista]

Are you sure it doesn't refer to your incomprehensible ramblings? The idea that you are somehow making a valid point by calling it "dumb" and your reasoning is "because" can only be considered... entertaining at best.

Yah, pretty sure. Entertaining, well, that's something at least, more than can be said for your drivel.

[Cunt]

but you, sandinista, say nothing over and over again with spite and derision.

[sandinista]

but you, sandinista, say nothing over and over again with spite and derision.

wha? I thought I was saying a lot with love and adulation.