The Donald-thread

[Forty Two]

[Tyrannical]

Citation Required

http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/01/khizr ... haria-law/
A short biography of Khan in the journal article says that he is the author of “In Defense of OPEC” and “Legal Index of the Quran.” It also lists that he is the co-founder of Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law.


Yup, not a moderate.

[Tyrannical]

Trump's not racist. And I'm a bit of an expert on that subject.....

That Mexican American judge, who happens to advocate for allowing illegals..... Yeah I can see why trump doesn't want him.

Illegal aliens? We have actual laws against it that aren't enforced.

Muslims? Gotta be careful about who you let in and keep terrorists and sharia advocates out.

[Animavore]

Citation Required

http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/01/khizr ... haria-law/
A short biography of Khan in the journal article says that he is the author of “In Defense of OPEC” and “Legal Index of the Quran.” It also lists that he is the co-founder of Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law.


Yup, not a moderate.

I think he meant from a reputable source.

[Animavore]

He's a racist. End of.

[Animavore]

Donald Trump gave America a peek inside his mind, when near the end of a campaign event in Florida, the Republican nominee referred to himself as "Mr. President."

http://linkis.com/www.politicususa.com/sfuJZ

Some one wake him up and tell him the dream is over.

[Brian Peacock]

Is it just me or is Donny losing weight?

[Animavore]

Is it just me or is Donny losing weight?

He's just losing in general.

[Brian Peacock]

"The King craves that which he cannot possess." -- Anne Boleyn.

[Sean Hayden]

His stupidity is a danger...

FireShot Screen Capture #020 - 'Facebook' - www_facebook_com.jpg

What's the answer to the question?

Are they illegal? Where? Many countries have them.

Hillary Clinton supports the development of tactical, battlefield nuclear weapons. If it's improper and "stupid" ask why such weapons cannot be used, then what level of stupidity is it to support development of weapons that cannot be used?

Isn't the answer to the question: they can, in fact, be used, in some circumstances? There are circumstances in US policy, British policy, French policy, Indian policy, Russian policy, etc., in which the use of nuclear weapons is called for.

This is one of those media circus events where we have double-hearsay -- "someone told me that Trump asked him such-and-such" and we're arguing about what Trump supposedly said, not to the person reporting it, but to another person. What was the context? Why were the questions asked? And, we have a situation where the worst is read into the question, and a motive is read into the question. He's asking why we can't use them, because the first thing he wants to do is use them. Well, why don't we take a step back? Doesn't every president need to know why they cannot (or can) be used in given circumstances? Or should/should not be used?

Yes, but you've got your lawyer hat on. A good lawyer can defend damn near anything.

The obvious answer is that we can't use them because MAD. There's nothing wrong with forgetting that.

[DaveDodo007]

Posting on this forum is going to be fun on Nov 9th.

[L'Emmerdeur]

I suppose it's "arguably true" that Trump saw a video of cash being offloaded from a plane in Iran. Even his own campaign says that he didn't, but no doubt Forty Two can explain how that argument would go. "Trump Repeats Apparent False Claim of Iran Cash Transfer Video"

[Tero]

L'Emmental would be more logical.

[DaveDodo007]

I suppose it's "arguably true" that Trump saw a video of cash being offloaded from a plane in Iran. Even his own campaign says that he didn't, but no doubt Forty Two can explain how that argument would go. "Trump Repeats Apparent False Claim of Iran Cash Transfer Video"

As if forty two doesn't know about how the money was frozen during the Iranian crisis. I have seen nothing from you to suggest you are more intelligent than forty two, Quite the opposite in fact.

[L'Emmerdeur]