I asked because there was quite a bit of doubt about his claim at the time.Adenosine wrote:Claimed seer? Who wouldn't protect him?
Protecting him doesn't explain why he didn't get a view on me ... unless you're a paranoid doctor.
Moderator: Mafia Mods
I asked because there was quite a bit of doubt about his claim at the time.Adenosine wrote:Claimed seer? Who wouldn't protect him?
Jesus. Gonzo you suck.charlou wrote:I asked because there was quite a bit of doubt about his claim at the time.Adenosine wrote:Claimed seer? Who wouldn't protect him?
Protecting him doesn't explain why he didn't get a view on me ... unless you're a paranoid doctor.
no NK ?Adenosine wrote:Jesus. Gonzo you suck.charlou wrote:I asked because there was quite a bit of doubt about his claim at the time.Adenosine wrote:Claimed seer? Who wouldn't protect him?
Protecting him doesn't explain why he didn't get a view on me ... unless you're a paranoid doctor.
Hey ksen, did you try to do anything last night?
Okay, so there was a scum kill, not a vig kill.Animavore wrote:I might as well come out 'cause it will clear a couple of issues I'm a role switcher. I can pick any two people and switch them so that any moves made on one will affect the other instead and vice versa.
Last night I switched Char and Irre so the kill put on Char must've got Irre instead so scum got their own player mwa-ha-ha.
Why did you say sorry to Zigmen if you thought you were just protecting him?Adenosine wrote:Except that you've had two views to Zigmen's zero.Azathoth wrote:I'm hoping that it works something like the game where I had a crapload of vigs but only one got a bullet each night. That would be best case scenariocharlou wrote:Not following the game. Electing to vote Feck when the obvious choice of the two would be ksen if it turns out Aza is a normal seer getting correct information.Animavore wrote:Why are you voting me, char?
Linus, how likely is it they'd all be normal seers if Zigmen didn't get a result on his view ... Unless he was blocked, of course.
And on that, sorry Zigmen.
We can't discount that a vig or indie tried to hit me, though scum seems more likely.Adenosine wrote:Okay, so there was a scum kill, not a vig kill.Animavore wrote:I might as well come out 'cause it will clear a couple of issues I'm a role switcher. I can pick any two people and switch them so that any moves made on one will affect the other instead and vice versa.
Last night I switched Char and Irre so the kill put on Char must've got Irre instead so scum got their own player mwa-ha-ha.
Yesterday I was toying with outing. I read G's OP when it said that Zigmen had died and was the seer. I asked G what was up with that when I had protected him and then G changed Z to Denny. Shortly afterwards G changed praying to Mantis. What got my attention was that Gonzo kept saying that the game wasn't broken. I wondered if G meant that the means were at hand for Zigmen to be cleared ie. I out that I had protected him and that G had stuffed the reveal up. I decided against it because quite frankly I didn't believe Zigmen and it seemed to be a stretch. I guess now that G meant that Z wasn't supposed to get a view. I wonder if only one of them was supposed to be able to get one a night.charlou wrote:Why did you say sorry to Zigmen if you thought you were just protecting him?Adenosine wrote:Except that you've had two views to Zigmen's zero.Azathoth wrote:I'm hoping that it works something like the game where I had a crapload of vigs but only one got a bullet each night. That would be best case scenariocharlou wrote:Not following the game. Electing to vote Feck when the obvious choice of the two would be ksen if it turns out Aza is a normal seer getting correct information.Animavore wrote:Why are you voting me, char?
Linus, how likely is it they'd all be normal seers if Zigmen didn't get a result on his view ... Unless he was blocked, of course.
And on that, sorry Zigmen.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests