
Right Wing Regressives Need to Stop
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 39971
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Right Wing Regressives Need to Stop
I'm telling the Bishop on you. 

Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- L'Emmerdeur
- Posts: 6236
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:04 pm
- About me: Yuh wust nightmaya!
- Contact:
Re: Right Wing Regressives Need to Stop
The stimulus tax break that Obama promised was never intended to last forever. That doesn't negate the fact that Obama kept his promise to cut taxes for 95% of working families. Once the stimulus tax break expired, middle class taxes remained largely the same as they had been during the Bush presidency.
"What Really Happened to Your Taxes While Obama Was President"
"What Really Happened to Your Taxes While Obama Was President"
The yelping about the ACA 'raising taxes' is a reliable Republican talking point, but the devil's in the details:As of 2013, the Tax Policy Center found that, under Obama, the top 1% of earners paid an effective federal tax rate of roughly 32%, compared to about 27% under Bush. But middle earners paid roughly 12%, almost exactly the same as under the previous president, while low earners paid a bit less -- about 2.3%, rather than 3.5%.
On net, the ACA significantly increased average taxes on families in the top one percent of income, cut taxes on families in the bottom quintiles, and modestly increased taxes on the rest of families. Repealing the ACA taxes in 2025 would provide an average tax cut of $46,000 to families in the top one percent, increasing their after-tax incomes by more than 2 percent. In contrast, average taxes for families in the bottom and second quintiles would increase by $90 and $170, respectively, reducing their after-tax incomes by at least .4 percent. Families in the middle quintile would receive an average tax cut of $240, increasing their after-tax incomes by .3 percent.
[source]
- Forty Two
- Posts: 14978
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
- About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
- Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
- Contact:
Re: Right Wing Regressives Need to Stop
Huh, but Bush only cut taxes for the rich. Did he also cut taxes for the middle class?L'Emmerdeur wrote:The stimulus tax break that Obama promised was never intended to last forever. That doesn't negate the fact that Obama kept his promise to cut taxes for 95% of working families. Once the stimulus tax break expired, middle class taxes remained largely the same as they had been during the Bush presidency.
Obama's stimulus tax cut was crushed by the increase in payroll tax.
the article from time that you posted says middle earners paid roughly 12%, almost exactly the same as under the previous president (as of 2013, not as of 2016...), but which is it - did he cut taxes for 95% of working families, or did they stay the same?
Look at the average federal tax burden on households. The CBO 2013 shows that in 2009, when Obama took office, the average household federal tax rate was 17.3 percent and in 2013, the rate was 20.1 percent - a nearly 3 percentage point increase. That's not insignificant.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests