God *could* exist you know!

[floppit]

My dog exists. I can tell because he's got popped bubbles stuck to his bum!

More seriously, I just can't be arsed to be agnostic, i'm sure there's no god even if I ought not to be.

[Don't Panic]

God does exist.

Does not.

Does too. I'm aware of that fact, whereas you are not.

Could you please just go away?

[Pappa]

God does exist.

Does not.

Does too. I'm aware of that fact, whereas you are not.

Could you please just go away?

[Coito ergo sum]

God does exist.

How do you know?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Mighty is the power of "ignore them and they'll go away", isn't it?

[Coito ergo sum]

Mighty is the power of "ignore them and they'll go away", isn't it?

I don't mind if he stays.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Mighty is the power of "ignore them and they'll go away", isn't it?

I don't mind if he stays.

And I don't mind if he goes. So we have no policy on this.

[Coito ergo sum]

Mighty is the power of "ignore them and they'll go away", isn't it?

I don't mind if he stays.

And I don't mind if he goes. So we have no policy on this.

God existing or not existing seems relevant to the atheism and religion category, and I enjoy the topic. To each his own.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Mighty is the power of "ignore them and they'll go away", isn't it?

I don't mind if he stays.

And I don't mind if he goes. So we have no policy on this.

God existing or not existing seems relevant to the atheism and religion category, and I enjoy the topic. To each his own.

Trolls tend to not stay on topic, it's all just an opening gambit for them. See his 22 sockpuppets at Ratzskep for further information.

[Coito ergo sum]

Mighty is the power of "ignore them and they'll go away", isn't it?

I don't mind if he stays.

And I don't mind if he goes. So we have no policy on this.

God existing or not existing seems relevant to the atheism and religion category, and I enjoy the topic. To each his own.

Trolls tend to not stay on topic, it's all just an opening gambit for them. See his 22 sockpuppets at Ratzskep for further information.

The damage done is minimal. It's far worse to see thread after thread with hundreds of postings about not feeding trolls, ignoring them, etc., all for the purpose of shutting a thread down. It seems sufficient to me that those who wish to converse can converse and those that wish not to converse are free to choose otherwise.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

The damage done is minimal. It's far worse to see thread after thread with hundreds of postings about not feeding trolls, ignoring them, etc., all for the purpose of shutting a thread down. It seems sufficient to me that those who wish to converse can converse and those that wish not to converse are free to choose otherwise.

Minimal? Right. How much "minimal" have you decided we should deal with?

[Coito ergo sum]

The damage done is minimal. It's far worse to see thread after thread with hundreds of postings about not feeding trolls, ignoring them, etc., all for the purpose of shutting a thread down. It seems sufficient to me that those who wish to converse can converse and those that wish not to converse are free to choose otherwise.

Minimal? Right. How much "minimal" have you decided we should deal with?

Any amount that doesn't violate the rules.

Which non-rule-violating posts meet with your approval?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

The damage done is minimal. It's far worse to see thread after thread with hundreds of postings about not feeding trolls, ignoring them, etc., all for the purpose of shutting a thread down. It seems sufficient to me that those who wish to converse can converse and those that wish not to converse are free to choose otherwise.

Minimal? Right. How much "minimal" have you decided we should deal with?

Any amount that doesn't violate the rules.

Play nice? That's not a rule, that's a sign over the door to the playground.

[Coito ergo sum]

The damage done is minimal. It's far worse to see thread after thread with hundreds of postings about not feeding trolls, ignoring them, etc., all for the purpose of shutting a thread down. It seems sufficient to me that those who wish to converse can converse and those that wish not to converse are free to choose otherwise.

Minimal? Right. How much "minimal" have you decided we should deal with?

Any amount that doesn't violate the rules.

Play nice? That's not a rule, that's a sign over the door to the playground.

Then it seems your gripe ought to be with the forum rules, rather than taking it upon yourself to decide which non-rule-violating posts are permissible and which should warrant a deluge of thread-stopping postings and calls for banishment.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Then it seems your gripe ought to be with the forum rules, rather than taking it upon yourself to decide which non-rule-violating posts are permissible and which should warrant a deluge of thread-stopping postings and calls for banishment.

There's nothing in the rules against that, so what's your problem? There's a whole lot of people saying I should do what they tell me to do. I find that amazingly optimistic.