I felt a modnote on http://www.rationalskepticism.org today was not fair, and have said so, in the Feedback forum as was requested in that modnote. It will be interesting to see if my question (which I tried to make as fact-based as possible) will lead to anything. This is it:
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/feedb ... 15154.html
Why did only Zwaarddijk get a warning?
Postby Ronja » Oct 30, 2010 6:08 pm
Regarding the "Gay rights cause exodus from Finnish national church" thread in News, Politics & Current Affairs:
Zwaarddijk has just received an advisory modnote
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news- ... ml#p549209
However, Zwaarddijk's blowing up was the direct result of that Sityl has been repeatedly derailing the thread with off-topic comments, most of which were pretty clearly needling (provoking) Zwaarddijk. So why was not also Sityl reprimaned, and preferably before Zwaarddijk, as Sityl's against-FUA behavior predated Zwaarddijk's?
Sityl's off-topic posts started with this: http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news- ... ml#p523062
and at least these three of Sityl's posts in the thread have been reported:
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news- ... ml#p524695
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news- ... ml#p530132
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news- ... ml#p547646
AFAICS, Sityl has not made even one truly ON-topic post in this thread, only off-topic (and aggravating) ones.
Fairly early on, also others reacted to what Sityl was doing, e.g.
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news- ... ml#p524685
and
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news- ... ml#p524703
and
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news- ... ml#p524751
So why was only Zwaarddijk modnoted?![]()