Scientific Proof Of God
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40340
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
supernatural maybe not, but the preternaturally stupid, greedy and malevolent nature of many, certainly.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 37953
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Steady.superuniverse wrote:I challenge you to have the balls to publish your real name...
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
JimC wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 8:12 pmSocial upheaval due to massive wealth inequality and environmental destruction may well be coming, but it has nothing to do with anything supernatural...superuniverse wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 4:28 pmAnd no one sees the coming Wrath....
BBC News - Super-rich increase their share of world's income
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-59565690
It's all business as usual, or so they think
Define supernatural. You don't know what you talk about.
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73015
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Oh yes I do. What I am saying is that the observable universe, which includes humans and their behaviour, can be understood and explained by purely rational and material phenomena. Supernatural explanations are not evidence based, and rely solely on faith and emotion. I reject any such nonsense absolutely - it is a hangover from our past, when natural phenomena such as lightning and thunder (now fully explained by purely material mechanisms) had to be attributed to agency such as a god. It is time to move on from the childhood of the human race...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
We are the third rock orbiting around a third rate star on the edge of galaxy which is just one of many untold millions that make up this single universe which according to latest knowledge is just one of untold universes.
He still thinks like those goat herders the heaven is supported by pillars. You FOOL as Carl Sagan said "there are more planets in the universe as all the corals of sand of all the beaches on earth".
Just think FOOL, just fucking think. This planet has fuck all worth. If we blow it up or destroy it wtf will the universe feel it. It will be a hic. A fart in evolution terms.
But idiots like you FOOL try to add other values to this rock of nothing. Make it something special. Well it is not. It is worth fuck all but of course you cant handle that.
Just FO will you.
He still thinks like those goat herders the heaven is supported by pillars. You FOOL as Carl Sagan said "there are more planets in the universe as all the corals of sand of all the beaches on earth".
Just think FOOL, just fucking think. This planet has fuck all worth. If we blow it up or destroy it wtf will the universe feel it. It will be a hic. A fart in evolution terms.
But idiots like you FOOL try to add other values to this rock of nothing. Make it something special. Well it is not. It is worth fuck all but of course you cant handle that.
Just FO will you.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
JimC wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:24 pmOh yes I do. What I am saying is that the observable universe, which includes humans and their behaviour, can be understood and explained by purely rational and material phenomena. Supernatural explanations are not evidence based, and rely solely on faith and emotion. I reject any such nonsense absolutely - it is a hangover from our past, when natural phenomena such as lightning and thunder (now fully explained by purely material mechanisms) had to be attributed to agency such as a god. It is time to move on from the childhood of the human race...
And become boring alcoholic old men like yourself...
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
You are the really tiny minority, FOOLScot Dutchy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 11:18 pmWe are the third rock orbiting around a third rate star on the edge of galaxy which is just one of many untold millions that make up this single universe which according to latest knowledge is just one of untold universes.
He still thinks like those goat herders the heaven is supported by pillars. You FOOL as Carl Sagan said "there are more planets in the universe as all the corals of sand of all the beaches on earth".
Just think FOOL, just fucking think. This planet has fuck all worth. If we blow it up or destroy it wtf will the universe feel it. It will be a hic. A fart in evolution terms.
But idiots like you FOOL try to add other values to this rock of nothing. Make it something special. Well it is not. It is worth fuck all but of course you cant handle that.
Just FO will you.
And that's why you're such easy targets...
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Come on FOOL who is the minority? Not me.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 37953
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
So something that does not currently exist in the natural world such as Utopia would be supernatural?JimC wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:24 pmOh yes I do. What I am saying is that the observable universe, which includes humans and their behaviour, can be understood and explained by purely rational and material phenomena. Supernatural explanations are not evidence based, and rely solely on faith and emotion. I reject any such nonsense absolutely - it is a hangover from our past, when natural phenomena such as lightning and thunder (now fully explained by purely material mechanisms) had to be attributed to agency such as a god. It is time to move on from the childhood of the human race...
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I was thinking of trying an experiment on some of you...
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73015
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
superuniverse wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:44 amSo something that does not currently exist in the natural world such as Utopia would be supernatural?JimC wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:24 pmOh yes I do. What I am saying is that the observable universe, which includes humans and their behaviour, can be understood and explained by purely rational and material phenomena. Supernatural explanations are not evidence based, and rely solely on faith and emotion. I reject any such nonsense absolutely - it is a hangover from our past, when natural phenomena such as lightning and thunder (now fully explained by purely material mechanisms) had to be attributed to agency such as a god. It is time to move on from the childhood of the human race...
Thanks to human imagination, there are myriads of imagined places. Narnia, Middle Earth, the list goes on. Imaginary is a different category to supernatural.utopia
NOUN
an imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect
I enjoy reading about them, but, not being delusional, at the same time I know they do not exist in the same sense as places in the real world...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2463
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
JimC wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 4:30 amsuperuniverse wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:44 amSo something that does not currently exist in the natural world such as Utopia would be supernatural?JimC wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:24 pmOh yes I do. What I am saying is that the observable universe, which includes humans and their behaviour, can be understood and explained by purely rational and material phenomena. Supernatural explanations are not evidence based, and rely solely on faith and emotion. I reject any such nonsense absolutely - it is a hangover from our past, when natural phenomena such as lightning and thunder (now fully explained by purely material mechanisms) had to be attributed to agency such as a god. It is time to move on from the childhood of the human race...Thanks to human imagination, there are myriads of imagined places. Narnia, Middle Earth, the list goes on. Imaginary is a different category to supernatural.utopia
NOUN
an imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect
I enjoy reading about them, but, not being delusional, at the same time I know they do not exist in the same sense as places in the real world...
So supernatural would be anything that doesn't currently exist in the natural world?
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73015
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Specifically, something made up by humans; a fantasy, but one that deluded humans think is real, but separate from the material world. Fairies, ghosts, spirits, gods, whatever; not fictional creations that the writer and reader know to be amusing or entertaining stories, but supposedly real. Real to the deluded, that is...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 37953
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Super = above, over, on the top (of), beyond, besides, in addition to.superuniverse wrote:JimC wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 4:30 amsuperuniverse wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:44 amSo something that does not currently exist in the natural world such as Utopia would be supernatural?JimC wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:24 pmOh yes I do. What I am saying is that the observable universe, which includes humans and their behaviour, can be understood and explained by purely rational and material phenomena. Supernatural explanations are not evidence based, and rely solely on faith and emotion. I reject any such nonsense absolutely - it is a hangover from our past, when natural phenomena such as lightning and thunder (now fully explained by purely material mechanisms) had to be attributed to agency such as a god. It is time to move on from the childhood of the human race...Thanks to human imagination, there are myriads of imagined places. Narnia, Middle Earth, the list goes on. Imaginary is a different category to supernatural.utopia
NOUN
an imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect
I enjoy reading about them, but, not being delusional, at the same time I know they do not exist in the same sense as places in the real world...
So supernatural would be anything that doesn't currently exist in the natural world?
Natural = existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind.
Equivocate = use ambiguous language so as to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests