That's funny, coz it's true

That's funny, coz it's true
No, but it does make me very suspicious of everything around it. It stops looking like an important sex assault, and more like some political game to try to get people fighting about stupid shit.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 4:59 am
But, what do you think? If Ms Ford told the truth is that truth somehow rendered false by Feinstein's manipulations or negated by a certain amount of money?
I guess the plumbers will appreciate the business.pErvinalia wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 8:15 amPutting gender on birth certificates is now optional in Tasmania. This means of course that we'll have toilets overflowing with perverts.![]()
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3me ... 4DsG6gYG1oNeo-Nazis Are Organizing Secretive Paramilitary Training Across America
The creation of a new social networking platform called “The Base” appears to be an effort to shift Naziism from a divided digital space to physical, violent insurgency.
I expect the shitwad who named it 'The Base' knows that 'al-Qaeda' means the same, in Arabic. Perhaps not.Animavore wrote: ↑Wed Nov 21, 2018 5:19 pmhttps://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3me ... 4DsG6gYG1oNeo-Nazis Are Organizing Secretive Paramilitary Training Across America
The creation of a new social networking platform called “The Base” appears to be an effort to shift Naziism from a divided digital space to physical, violent insurgency.
Yes, you said it in precisely that sense right here.
The context makes it clear beyond any reasonable doubt that when you wrote "Swetnick as well - she admitted to lying", you did mean that in the sense of her having said words to the effect of "Ok, guys, I admit it, I lied." Besides, by no stretch of the imagination can "she admitted to lying" be synonymous with "her own stories are self-contradictory." Both assertions may be true, or one, or none, but regardless of the veracity of each, they remain separate assertions, quite distinct from each other.Forty Two wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 7:12 pmSwetnick as well - she admitted to lying.L'Emmerdeur wrote: ↑Sat Nov 10, 2018 1:04 amThe source you cite describes one woman who tried to claim that she was a 'Jane Doe' accuser. She was not, according to your source. She lied about being 'Jane Doe,' but that has nothing to do with 'Jane Doe's' accusation. You haven't presented any evidence that the 'Jane Doe' was lying. Since you wrote "accusers" plural, who are the others (aside from the inconsistencies in Blasey Ford's recollections you've made such a meal of here) who you believe have been shown to be lying?
And the woman who claimed to be the Jane Doe lied.
I don't think Forty Two could end up with less egg on his face after this whopperHermit wrote: ↑Thu Nov 22, 2018 3:23 amYes, you said it in precisely that sense right here.
The context makes it clear beyond any reasonable doubt that when you wrote "Swetnick as well - she admitted to lying", you did mean that in the sense of her having said words to the effect of "Ok, guys, I admit it, I lied." Besides, by no stretch of the imagination can "she admitted to lying" be synonymous with "her own stories are self-contradictory." Both assertions may be true, or one, or none, but regardless of the veracity of each, they remain separate assertions, quite distinct from each other.Forty Two wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 7:12 pmSwetnick as well - she admitted to lying.L'Emmerdeur wrote: ↑Sat Nov 10, 2018 1:04 amThe source you cite describes one woman who tried to claim that she was a 'Jane Doe' accuser. She was not, according to your source. She lied about being 'Jane Doe,' but that has nothing to do with 'Jane Doe's' accusation. You haven't presented any evidence that the 'Jane Doe' was lying. Since you wrote "accusers" plural, who are the others (aside from the inconsistencies in Blasey Ford's recollections you've made such a meal of here) who you believe have been shown to be lying?
And the woman who claimed to be the Jane Doe lied.
You'd have finished up with less egg on your face, had you simply written something like: "OK, she did not admit to lying, but her stories are self-contradictory, which makes her a liar" instead of absurdly trying to twist the meaning of "she admitted to lying".
and you know what they say, "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus."
Changing the caption and deleting comments does not make your "cowboys and Indians" party ok. Shame on you @enikohart and @KevinHart4real Culture isn't a costume
Throwin a "Cowboys & Indians" birthday party on "Thanksgiving" celebrates genocide, white supremacy, & slavery. R those the things u @KevinHart4real & @enikohart represent & are teaching to your child? Would it be ok to throw a Master & slave birthday party? nope #nativetwitter
“Cowboys and Indians? Can you not afford a publicist who would explain the reality [of] such a terrible idea?” one commenter wrote.
“Hey, let’s play Nazis and Jews for next year’s bday party,” another chimed in.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests