Is poverty a moral failing...

Post Reply
User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 37953
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Brian Peacock » Fri Nov 25, 2016 12:29 pm

...and if so, for and/of whom?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 59295
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by pErvinalia » Fri Nov 25, 2016 12:35 pm

Yes. It's a failing of the poor person. If only there were more morally upstanding people like Paris Hilton in the world.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 40340
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Svartalf » Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:05 pm

No it's not, it takes those crazy protos with their theology that affluence is a mark of divine favor to believe such a crazy thing.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Strontium Dog
Posts: 2146
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:28 am
About me: Navy Seals are not seals
Location: Liverpool, UK
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Strontium Dog » Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:50 pm

Surely poverty is the natural state of things for everyone, can small amounts of poverty be described as a failing?
100% verifiable facts or your money back. Anti-fascist. Enemy of woo - theistic or otherwise. Cloth is not an antiviral. Imagination and fantasy is no substitute for tangible reality. Wishing doesn't make it real.

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater

User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by cronus » Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:59 pm

The Interweb, Death and Taxes are the three great equalisers. :coffee:
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 37953
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Brian Peacock » Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:13 pm

To start with, 'poverty' is a pretty nebulous term. One can think of it as a lack of resources (i.e. a lack of money, clothing, housing, food, etc) and one can think of it as a lack of opportunity or access to resources (to money, clothing, housing, food etc). In general terms though it clearly represents the deprivation of necessary goods, either of the personal or social kind, or both. The topic title and first post speak to the nature of that deprivation, to its cause; and to responsibility and where it lies.

For many Victorians for example, the hardships of poverty were simply the wages of sin. Being poor was a signifier of an absence of more than just money, It was a state of being emblematic of an absence of moral standards or courage, a state borne from the victory of hedonistic desire over the innate virtues of self-control and denial, the victory of base urges over rational thinking, the victory of Satan over God even. The poor were poor because they lived for the short- rather than the long-term, they frittered what little incomes they had on gin and fleshly pleasures, they remained dirty, unfed, ill-mannered, and educationally impoverished because they lacked the personal fortitude to 'better' themselves and their situations; the poor succumbed to vice and paid the price of their lack of ambition and moral resilience.

In this there was an obvious accompanying attitude that spoke to the higher moral standards and courage emblematic of wealth, and of (if not wealth exactly but at least) an absence of poverty as signifying a state of virtue which carried its own rewards, of wealth being the 'just deserts' of a good and virtuous life. I feel these kinds of attitudes, typically exemplified by notions of poverty as a moral failing, still have some common currency today.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by cronus » Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:56 pm

Poverty is caused by drinking. :read:
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 20981
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by laklak » Fri Nov 25, 2016 5:03 pm

There's some truth to that, I am feeling rather poorly this morning due to overconsumption of wine yesterday.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 40340
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Svartalf » Fri Nov 25, 2016 5:09 pm

Crumple wrote:Poverty is caused by drinking. :read:
drinking is not a moral failure, it's caused by a natural need called 'thirst'.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Hermit » Sat Nov 26, 2016 12:16 am

The glorification of wealth in Christian societies began with Protestantism, particularly among Calvinists and Puritans. People were supposed to accumulate wealth not in order to wallow in it, but to use it for righteous purposes, like in order to help the poor. The more of that an individual did, the more virtuous he was considered to be. Conversely, a poor person was not virtuous on grounds of neglecting to do God's work. The Protestant view regarding wealth is of course bullshit. It involves the time-honoured tradition of cherry picking. Among the chosen cherries was Matthew 25:14-29. Among the rejected ones Matthew 6: 24, 19:21 and 19:24.

In time the objective for accumulating wealth - as a tool to help the poor - was forgotten, but the ideas that wealthy people were godly people and poor people were neglectful, were not. Add to that the rise of individualism that developed from Protestantism, and you have the perfect recipe for admiring rich people and despising the poor on a personal as well as a social level.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Seth » Sat Nov 26, 2016 2:35 am

Poverty is not necessarily a moral failing. Some people choose poverty and choose to exist by their own devices or depend upon the (voluntary) charity of others.

Poverty only becomes a moral failing when the person uses poverty as an excuse to demand largess from the public treasury, which is to say demands that other people labor to support her and uses the force inherent in government to extract that support without consent.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 37953
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Brian Peacock » Sat Nov 26, 2016 3:03 am

Seth wrote:Poverty is not necessarily a moral failing. Some people choose poverty and choose to exist by their own devices or depend upon the (voluntary) charity of others.

Poverty only becomes a moral failing when the person uses poverty as an excuse to demand largess from the public treasury, which is to say demands that other people labor to support her and uses the force inherent in government to extract that support without consent.
Must each individual co-member of society consent to the government offering assistance, on their behalf, to those in dire need? What do you consider to be the moral status of those who find themselves in a state of poverty which they did not choose for themselves?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Seth » Sat Nov 26, 2016 3:31 am

Brian Peacock wrote:
Seth wrote:Poverty is not necessarily a moral failing. Some people choose poverty and choose to exist by their own devices or depend upon the (voluntary) charity of others.

Poverty only becomes a moral failing when the person uses poverty as an excuse to demand largess from the public treasury, which is to say demands that other people labor to support her and uses the force inherent in government to extract that support without consent.
Must each individual co-member of society consent to the government offering assistance, on their behalf, to those in dire need? What do you consider to be the moral status of those who find themselves in a state of poverty which they did not choose for themselves?
Yes, of course. Redistributive taxation, which specifically includes taking money (fruits of labor) from one person in order to give it to another person without the express consent of the person it's taken from is absolutely immoral. It is government's duty and obligation to advocate for, solicit and collect VOLUNTARY donations to help the poor, not coerce what it decides the poor need from others.

You see, government is biased to serve the interests of the idle dependent class because in doing so it can secure their votes to keep government in power. Therefore it is immoral for government to exercise its power of coercion on behalf of the dependent class because not only is it an immoral conflict of interest but it will inevitably end up coercing more from the productive class than the dependent class actually needs to survive because the dependent class, particularly when it becomes quite large, will always demand more and more largess from government coffers.

You see, "government" isn't some independent creature or entity, it IS the people, so when the dependent class are permitted to vote, they inevitably vote themselves ever-more largess from the public purse. But the "public purse" isn't an independent entity either, it's nothing more than the wallets of those who actually work and earn money from whom government agents take whatever amount the government (which is to say the dependent class) demands in order to meet their desires. Thus there is an inherent conflict of interest in allowing the dependent class to vote, which means that to prevent the dependent class from robbing the productive class all funding must be voluntary on the part of the productive class.

The only fair and rational way to fund social services and benefits is through voluntary contributions from taxpayers, and the way to get those contributions is for government to show potential donors why it is in their rational self-interest to contribute to such efforts. Thus, government's role should be that of a funds solicitor and should focus its efforts on demonstrating to the productive class why a small voluntary donation on the part of individuals will create a large benefit to society and a benefit to the individual donors.

If the donation cannot be shown to provide tangible, real benefits to both society as a whole and to the individual donors, then why on earth should the donation be made? Funding dependent-class-beholden bureaucrats out to secure votes is NOT a rational justification for coercing funds from unwilling donors. It's immoral.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Sean Hayden
Microagressor
Posts: 17879
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
About me: recovering humanist
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Sean Hayden » Sat Nov 26, 2016 5:45 am

If you don't like it, leave. There's got to be a successful libertarian utopia somewhere. The US isn't one and never will be.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39234
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Is poverty a moral failing...

Post by Animavore » Sat Nov 26, 2016 6:39 am

Somalia.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests