JacksSmirkingRevenge wrote:"Is it poisonous?"
"No."
"Ah, good."....*picks it up*
"It is highly venomous, though."





JacksSmirkingRevenge wrote:"Is it poisonous?"
"No."
"Ah, good."....*picks it up*
"It is highly venomous, though."
Three generations now, I think - must be a dominant gene.Svartalf wrote:Well, the son inherited the stupid gene
1 and 2: You think Jamie Coots is representative of well over 300 million US citizens?mistermack wrote:It's just typical US behaviour. ... It's not just a few loonies ... nobody CALLS them loonies.
Sure, but mm's point about the media giving them unwarranted respect still stands, I think...Hermit wrote:1 and 2: You think Jamie Coots is representative of well over 300 million US citizens?mistermack wrote:It's just typical US behaviour. ... It's not just a few loonies ... nobody CALLS them loonies.
3: The article linked to in the OP is followed by 410 comments. You obviously did not bother looking at even the first one. It simply says: "Darwin award winner". Many others follow along that line.
4 days later, I finally get this.klr wrote:JacksSmirkingRevenge wrote:"Is it poisonous?"
"No."
"Ah, good."....*picks it up*
"It is highly venomous, though."![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests