Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post Reply
User avatar
colubridae
Custom Rank: Rank
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
Location: Birmingham art gallery
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by colubridae » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:11 pm

Nah... the north american plate rotated as it moved so his V in the N Atlantic did not happen.

Magnetic anomaly measurements support this rotation.
the theory of plate tectonics stands. :pawiz:
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders

Brain Man
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 12:59 am
About me: Formerly Mr jobby till i was relieved of my duties.
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by Brain Man » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:22 pm

colubridae wrote:Nah... the north american plate rotated as it moved so his V in the N Atlantic did not happen.

Magnetic anomaly measurements support this rotation.
the theory of plate tectonics stands. :pawiz:
Both EE and PT accept the ocean floor map data, in principle. One point Maxlow stresses, however, is that in the case of PT, published plate reconstructions have never been constrained by the requirements of conforming to this data. In M.'s reconstructions, by contrast, since there is only one fit option at each stage, the paleomagnetic data can then act as an independent test of consistency. The resulting models can then be tested for consistency with a host of other data sets.

User avatar
colubridae
Custom Rank: Rank
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
Location: Birmingham art gallery
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by colubridae » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:35 pm

Brain Man wrote:
colubridae wrote:Nah... the north american plate rotated as it moved so his V in the N Atlantic did not happen.

Magnetic anomaly measurements support this rotation.
the theory of plate tectonics stands. :pawiz:
Both EE and PT accept the ocean floor map data, in principle. One point Maxlow stresses, however, is that in the case of PT, published plate reconstructions have never been constrained by the requirements of conforming to this data. In M.'s reconstructions, by contrast, since there is only one fit option at each stage, the paleomagnetic data can then act as an independent test of consistency. The resulting models can then be tested for consistency with a host of other data sets.
Just not the earth monn measurements.
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders

Brain Man
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 12:59 am
About me: Formerly Mr jobby till i was relieved of my duties.
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by Brain Man » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:42 pm

colubridae wrote:Nah... the north american plate rotated as it moved so his V in the N Atlantic did not happen.

Magnetic anomaly measurements support this rotation.
the theory of plate tectonics stands. :pawiz:

Took you all of 5 hours to answer after viewing this, after going to look up something minimal to disprove it publicly ?

I am interested though colubridae...colubridae ? what is that ? Anyway this fascinating..

So you are one of those people right..who basically saw the expanding earth animation..

What was your first thought...You didnt have any answer at the time, I am presuming because geology isnt your area.

So your first instinct was to try and seek out a reason to say "nah"... basically ? Then of course you would never think about whether you were standing on an expanding planet again unless it was put in your face to think about.

Thats why i think laziness and the strategy to remain mentally lazy rather than belief drives a lot of the problems we are discussing here. You basically don't care for anything that requires too much work, and your strategy is orientated towards keeping things that way. You see this going on all the time in science and many other areas. The energy expended is proportional to the minimum required to keep something new re-emerging again.

Same as when i got here, your first instinct was to find a reason to say i wasn't educated, ..then when that didn't work it is to wait and try and lump me in to various categories of personality traits of types you can discredit.

So basically your brain activity is completely focused on denial just to keep things the way you like ?

Brain Man
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 12:59 am
About me: Formerly Mr jobby till i was relieved of my duties.
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by Brain Man » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:42 pm

colubridae wrote:
Brain Man wrote:
colubridae wrote:Nah... the north american plate rotated as it moved so his V in the N Atlantic did not happen.

Magnetic anomaly measurements support this rotation.
the theory of plate tectonics stands. :pawiz:
Both EE and PT accept the ocean floor map data, in principle. One point Maxlow stresses, however, is that in the case of PT, published plate reconstructions have never been constrained by the requirements of conforming to this data. In M.'s reconstructions, by contrast, since there is only one fit option at each stage, the paleomagnetic data can then act as an independent test of consistency. The resulting models can then be tested for consistency with a host of other data sets.
Just not the earth monn measurements.
Satellites show sea level increasing by 3 mm/yr, which is to say an increase relative to the center of the earth, but tide gauges only show about 1.8 mm/yr (sea relative to land). If the measurements are valid, land and sea levels must both increasing relative to earth's center

User avatar
colubridae
Custom Rank: Rank
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
Location: Birmingham art gallery
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by colubridae » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:55 pm

Brain Man wrote:
colubridae wrote:Nah... the north american plate rotated as it moved so his V in the N Atlantic did not happen.

Magnetic anomaly measurements support this rotation.
the theory of plate tectonics stands. :pawiz:

Took you all of 5 hours to answer after viewing this, after going to look up something minimal to disprove it publicly ?

I am interested though colubridae...colubridae ? what is that ? Anyway this fascinating..

So you are one of those people right..who basically saw the expanding earth animation..

What was your first thought...You didnt have any answer at the time, I am presuming because geology isnt your area.

So your first instinct was to try and seek out a reason to say "nah"... basically ? Then of course you would never think about whether you were standing on an expanding planet again unless it was put in your face to think about.

Thats why i think laziness and the strategy to remain mentally lazy rather than belief drives a lot of the problems we are discussing here. You basically don't care for anything that requires too much work, and your strategy is orientated towards keeping things that way. You see this going on all the time in science and many other areas. The energy expended is proportional to the minimum required to keep something new re-emerging again.

Same as when i got here, your first instinct was to find a reason to say i wasn't educated, ..then when that didn't work it is to wait and try and lump me in to various categories of personality traits of types you can discredit.

So basically your brain activity is completely focused on denial just to keep things the way you like ?

:yawn:
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders

Brain Man
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 12:59 am
About me: Formerly Mr jobby till i was relieved of my duties.
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by Brain Man » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:57 pm

colubridae wrote:
Brain Man wrote:
colubridae wrote:Nah... the north american plate rotated as it moved so his V in the N Atlantic did not happen.

Magnetic anomaly measurements support this rotation.
the theory of plate tectonics stands. :pawiz:

Took you all of 5 hours to answer after viewing this, after going to look up something minimal to disprove it publicly ?

I am interested though colubridae...colubridae ? what is that ? Anyway this fascinating..

So you are one of those people right..who basically saw the expanding earth animation..

What was your first thought...You didnt have any answer at the time, I am presuming because geology isnt your area.

So your first instinct was to try and seek out a reason to say "nah"... basically ? Then of course you would never think about whether you were standing on an expanding planet again unless it was put in your face to think about.

Thats why i think laziness and the strategy to remain mentally lazy rather than belief drives a lot of the problems we are discussing here. You basically don't care for anything that requires too much work, and your strategy is orientated towards keeping things that way. You see this going on all the time in science and many other areas. The energy expended is proportional to the minimum required to keep something new re-emerging again.

Same as when i got here, your first instinct was to find a reason to say i wasn't educated, ..then when that didn't work it is to wait and try and lump me in to various categories of personality traits of types you can discredit.

So basically your brain activity is completely focused on denial just to keep things the way you like ?

:yawn:
I have always find that just when you are onto something that person strategically feigns boredom. Which is of course a lie, as there is nothing boring about having your motivations taken apart publicly.

User avatar
colubridae
Custom Rank: Rank
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
Location: Birmingham art gallery
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by colubridae » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:58 pm

Brain Man wrote:
colubridae wrote:
Brain Man wrote:
colubridae wrote:Nah... the north american plate rotated as it moved so his V in the N Atlantic did not happen.

Magnetic anomaly measurements support this rotation.
the theory of plate tectonics stands. :pawiz:

Took you all of 5 hours to answer after viewing this, after going to look up something minimal to disprove it publicly ?

I am interested though colubridae...colubridae ? what is that ? Anyway this fascinating..

So you are one of those people right..who basically saw the expanding earth animation..

What was your first thought...You didnt have any answer at the time, I am presuming because geology isnt your area.

So your first instinct was to try and seek out a reason to say "nah"... basically ? Then of course you would never think about whether you were standing on an expanding planet again unless it was put in your face to think about.

Thats why i think laziness and the strategy to remain mentally lazy rather than belief drives a lot of the problems we are discussing here. You basically don't care for anything that requires too much work, and your strategy is orientated towards keeping things that way. You see this going on all the time in science and many other areas. The energy expended is proportional to the minimum required to keep something new re-emerging again.

Same as when i got here, your first instinct was to find a reason to say i wasn't educated, ..then when that didn't work it is to wait and try and lump me in to various categories of personality traits of types you can discredit.

So basically your brain activity is completely focused on denial just to keep things the way you like ?

:yawn:
I have always find that just when you are onto something that person strategically feigns boredom. Which is of course a lie, as there is nothing boring about having your motivations taken apart publicly.
:yawn:
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders

User avatar
colubridae
Custom Rank: Rank
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
Location: Birmingham art gallery
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by colubridae » Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:06 pm

Brain Man wrote: I have always find that just when you are onto something that person strategically feigns boredom. Which is of course a lie, as there is nothing boring about having your motivations taken apart publicly.
oops sorry got bored and did it again. This must be getting to you? :funny: :funny: :funny:
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders

Brain Man
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 12:59 am
About me: Formerly Mr jobby till i was relieved of my duties.
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by Brain Man » Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:15 pm

colubridae wrote:
Brain Man wrote: I have always find that just when you are onto something that person strategically feigns boredom. Which is of course a lie, as there is nothing boring about having your motivations taken apart publicly.
oops sorry got bored and did it again. This must be getting to you? :funny: :funny: :funny:
Not really ive seen and heard it all i think, although always be prepared to be surprised.

I was just trying this stuff out to see your response. Playing the boredom card was a definite hit. Seen that so many times when im onto something. Oldest trick in the book people pretending to be bored so they can buy time to recover from a minor heart flutter.

Brain Man
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 12:59 am
About me: Formerly Mr jobby till i was relieved of my duties.
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by Brain Man » Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:17 pm

anyway colubridae or should i say the "snake"...

How about coming clean for the general sake of say sssssugar puffs or Mars delight ?

User avatar
colubridae
Custom Rank: Rank
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
Location: Birmingham art gallery
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by colubridae » Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:18 pm

Brain Man wrote:
colubridae wrote:
Brain Man wrote: I have always find that just when you are onto something that person strategically feigns boredom. Which is of course a lie, as there is nothing boring about having your motivations taken apart publicly.
oops sorry got bored and did it again. This must be getting to you? :funny: :funny: :funny:
Not really ive seen and heard it all i think, although always be prepared to be surprised.

I was just trying this stuff out to see your response. Playing the boredom card was a definite hit. Seen that so many times when im onto something. Oldest trick in the book people pretending to be bored so they can buy time to recover from a minor heart flutter.


No still bored. :yawn: and you are still rattled. :hilarious:
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders

Brain Man
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 12:59 am
About me: Formerly Mr jobby till i was relieved of my duties.
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by Brain Man » Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:42 pm

colubridae wrote:
Brain Man wrote:
colubridae wrote:
Brain Man wrote: I have always find that just when you are onto something that person strategically feigns boredom. Which is of course a lie, as there is nothing boring about having your motivations taken apart publicly.
oops sorry got bored and did it again. This must be getting to you? :funny: :funny: :funny:
Not really ive seen and heard it all i think, although always be prepared to be surprised.

I was just trying this stuff out to see your response. Playing the boredom card was a definite hit. Seen that so many times when im onto something. Oldest trick in the book people pretending to be bored so they can buy time to recover from a minor heart flutter.


No still bored. :yawn: and you are still rattled. :hilarious:
If you say so..

Brain Man
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 12:59 am
About me: Formerly Mr jobby till i was relieved of my duties.
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by Brain Man » Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:44 pm

Usually when im rattled you get a big long post..havent you noticed by now.. :ask:

Ah well so much for you being a master of strategy, unless this is of course your public rather than private strategy...

Brain Man
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 12:59 am
About me: Formerly Mr jobby till i was relieved of my duties.
Contact:

Re: Mass Explained By Someone who knows about Science

Post by Brain Man » Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:46 pm

mmm Boredom, strategy, expanding planets, denial...

Whats an everyday human suppose to make of it all ? :fp:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests