Conspiracy Theories

[pErvinalia]

Not surprised to see Cunt is an AGW denier. Fits with his other kooky conspiracy theorising. He's nothing if not predictable.

[L'Emmerdeur]

Yo, there's a thread for this twaddle.

[Cunt]

Ah yes, call the other side 'denialists'. Such fair, unbiased language.

Do go on giving up your energy production to a few favoured countries. It's for science!

[L'Emmerdeur]

Ah yes, call the other side 'denialists'. Such fair, unbiased language.

Do go on giving up your energy production to a few favoured countries. It's for science!

Denialist is an accurate description of those who've been taken in by lies and propaganda from the fossil energy corporations and their minions. Decades ago those corporations' own scientists were aware of the facts, yet they've spent millions to prop up the denialist line. If you've been taken in by those lies and propaganda but don't like the accurate description of what's going on, well done on finding another spurious grievance to grind your teeth about.

[Cunt]

Ah yes, call the other side 'denialists'. Such fair, unbiased language.

Do go on giving up your energy production to a few favoured countries. It's for science!

Denialist is an accurate description of those who've been taken in by lies and propaganda from the fossil energy corporations and their minions. Decades ago those corporations' own scientists were aware of the facts, yet they've spent millions to prop up the denialist line. If you've been taken in by those lies and propaganda but don't like the accurate description of what's going on, well done on finding another spurious grievance to grind your teeth about.

most of the 'climate change' nonsense peddlers (Thunberg, Gore, Obama et al) are such bad spokespeople, I would denounce their support before they damaged my cause.

But you do you.

Oh, and most 'climate change' whingers are not supporting nuclear power either. They don't want a solution, they want to be upset.

It's pretty easy to dismiss those who are on 'Team Greta' as similarly educated as the teen heartthrob of the UN.

[macdoc]

Oh, and most 'climate change' whingers are not supporting nuclear power either.

Another unsupported statement from the local science hater.....gets old ....you are fighting battles long lost by the "paid for opinion" deniers from the right wing.... Your comments are now a dated parody ....the world has moved on.

The forum I fought most of the paid for deniers funded by Exxon et al was populated by scientists and engineers and in a vote a while back 80% supported nuclear energy.

The fact of AGW is easy to understand.
The physics of AGW is easy to understand.
The best methods to mitigate the damage...immensely complex.

Stopping the trillions of subsidies for fossil fuels would be a start.

You are just a suckered shill for fossil fuel industry Cunt
.....wear it.

[Cunt]

I got suckered? I like oil. It keeps the people around me alive.

As to your climate change bullshit...what ends it?

I mean, does 'climate stasis' happen, and you get to stop paying the commies? Or is it closer to the truth that no matter WHAT happens, it'll mean AGW is happening, an imminent threat, and you should support commies...

Cause that sounds really crazy. Like an imaginary problem with no defined solution, no clear goal, and lots of grist for politicians to, um, use to fool people.

[L'Emmerdeur]

It's pretty easy to dismiss those who are on 'Team Greta' as similarly educated as the teen heartthrob of the UN.

A remarkably firm grip on the wrong end of the stick there. Ms Thunberg is on the side of the vast majority of scientists who've devoted their lives to understanding climatology. There isn't any credible doubt as to the results of the work that they've done. They are far more qualified than you or Thunberg or myself to render an opinion on the issue. Thunberg has managed to get some attention, but it's actually the scientists you have a disagreement with. The question is why do you disagree with them? What has convinced you that they're wrong?

[Cunt]

HOW DARE YOU!!??

/gretavoice

Someone should trick all the climate change hucksters into buying expensive waterfront properties. Then when the seas rise, they'll lose everything!

And whatever you do, don't bother doubting your cause for a SECOND. Remember - no matter what the weather does, it proves your climate is changing!

[Brian Peacock]

It's pretty easy to dismiss those who are on 'Team Greta' as similarly educated as the teen heartthrob of the UN.

A remarkably firm grip on the wrong end of the stick there. Ms Thunberg is on the side of the vast majority of scientists who've devoted their lives to understanding climatology. There isn't any credible doubt as to the results of the work that they've done. They are far more qualified than you or Thunberg or myself to render an opinion on the issue. Thunberg has managed to get some attention, but it's actually the scientists you have a disagreement with. The question is why do you disagree with them? What has convinced you that they're wrong?

Cunt's been pre-convinced. If the despicably "woke" Corporate Media accept the reality of global heating then climate change must inevitably be "woke" too, and therefore something to be opposed. So if Corporate Fossil Fuel are opposing moves to address climate change/limit global heating then they're opposing "wokeness" and they automatically become the brokers of 'reliable' information and trusted confederates in the ongoing battle against the horrid-lefty-science-plot-political-correct-Epstein-loving-woke-brigade. You don't even need to think about science, let alone climate science if you're willing to frame global heating in those kinds of terms. Sticking it to the libs is all that matters.

[Cunt]

I don't need to look into it. Greta/Gore/Obama have made it VERY clear what is important, and to whom.

But don't let the fact that there is no 'win condition' or 'lose condition' dissuade you from belief. It's worth giving up all your oil just in case.

[pErvinalia]

Oh so predictable, Cunt. What's next, the moon landing was faked? The earth is flat?

[L'Emmerdeur]

Like I said upthread, there's a thread for this twaddle. It's certainly not science news of the day.

---

---

It's pretty easy to dismiss those who are on 'Team Greta' as similarly educated as the teen heartthrob of the UN.

A remarkably firm grip on the wrong end of the stick there. Ms Thunberg is on the side of the vast majority of scientists who've devoted their lives to understanding climatology. There isn't any credible doubt as to the results of the work that they've done. They are far more qualified than you or Thunberg or myself to render an opinion on the issue. Thunberg has managed to get some attention, but it's actually the scientists you have a disagreement with. The question is why do you disagree with them? What has convinced you that they're wrong?

Cunt's been pre-convinced. If the despicably "woke" Corporate Media accept the reality of global heating then climate change must inevitably be "woke" too, and therefore something to be opposed. So if Corporate Fossil Fuel are opposing moves to address climate change/limit global heating then they're opposing "wokeness" and they automatically become the brokers of 'reliable' information and trusted confederates in the ongoing battle against the horrid-lefty-science-plot-political-correct-Epstein-loving-woke-brigade. You don't even need to think about science, let alone climate science if you're willing to frame global heating in those kinds of terms. Sticking it to the libs is all that matters.

His reply confirms your hypothesis. Science be damned; he doesn't like some of those who're drawing attention to the issue and that's all he needs to know. As pErvinalia implies, it may be a pose adopted under a bridge for the lols. I'll just take the hyperborean 'leftie's' word for it. I don't begrudge him the lols.

[Cunt]

If your science ever disagreed with the UN and their commie goals, they might be a bit more believable.

But everyone knows, no science is done for free. In fact, if you want to apply for funding, it's easy. Just make sure you remember your pledge to the DEI religion, or pretend to pledge, and you can have the funding.

Pure science, that!

[pErvinalia]

It's UN-WEF. Come on, get your conspiracy theories right.