Is the moon necessary for life?

User avatar
GenesForLife
Bertie Wooster
Posts: 1392
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by GenesForLife » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:21 pm

devogue wrote:I hate it when moonlight wakes me up.

Moonlight Sonata my arse.
:lol:

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:22 pm

amused wrote:The moon was originally a part of earth and was knocked away by a big asteroid. The earth would have been biggerer if that hadn't happened. So we'd all have biggerer muscle bits to compensate for the higher gravity of a biggerer earth.

So it's the asteroids fault if you have smallerer muscles.
It was an asteroid the size of Mars, or so I've heard.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:08 pm

Dory wrote:Biologically speaking-- it seems like a useless piece of junk, really. I mean, life doesn't actually need a moonlight, right?

Disclaimer: I don't mean to underestimate its poetical beauty, but from practical PoV...
If it wasn't for the moon, humans most likely would not be here. The moon stabilizes the Earth somewhat, and without it there would have been violent and repeated changes in climate.

If the moon had never been there, our day would be about 8 hours long (the moon has helped slow down the Earth). Tides would have been much lower, since the only tidal forces would have been from the sun. A faster rotation means faster winds (figure common winds at 100 miles per hour - hurricane-like), and storm winds would be much faster and much more common.

Since the moon was formed much closer to the Earth - about 10-15 times closer than it is now - and has since been moving away - we know that when the moon first formed the tides were tremendous - like 1,000 times higher than they are now - and very frequent. This constant churning caused the oceans to fill up with compounds necessary for life much faster than would occur in a moonless Earth.

It's seems reasonable to conclude that it would have taken a lot longer for life to begin on Earth because of not having a moon. If life formed, then evolution would have been quite different, with a much shorter day and only 3-4 hours of sunlight per day and the massively high winds. It may be more difficult for complex life to form, and if it did it would likely have radically different biology.

devogue

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by devogue » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:18 pm

The Moon is definitely necessary for life, for a number of very good reasons:

1) It lights up dark country roads at night so that when drunk people walk home from the pub they don't fall down ditches and die. Drunk people have more sex than sober people and they don't bother with contraception. Bada bing, as they say at Caltech.

2) The Moon enables werewolves to do their shit, culling the really stupid bastards that don't "keep to the path" and ensuring that the gene pool stays strong and healthy.

3) At night time "Moon Rain" falls from the Moon - it's made of Cambazola and it lands all over the countryside. It gets eaten by loony-chompers, the lowest form of molecular life - they in turn shit out lumps of "fotosinthesis" which are nom-nommed by hungry grass, and so on up the food chain.

4) The moon's spinning around the Earth is like a giant ball going round and round. This huge ball distracts our huge cats, the lions, and it stops them from taking over and eating us all.

:awesome: :awesome: :awesome:

User avatar
Elessarina
Bearer of Anduril
Bearer of Anduril
Posts: 9517
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
Location: Rivendell
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by Elessarina » Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:19 pm

Svartalf wrote:Bravo Elessarina :clap:

I wanted to do the same, but the pancakebunny :bunny: reflex failed me.

:cranky:

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by RuleBritannia » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:03 pm

SPMaximus wrote:
amused wrote:The moon was originally a part of earth and was knocked away by a big asteroid
And heres a nifty lil' animation showing it
Image

But its only a hypothesis
Wait. The asteroid was bigger than the Moon? That means the impact increased the size of the Earth.
RuleBritannia © MMXI

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:07 pm

RuleBritannia wrote:Wait. The asteroid was bigger than the Moon? That means the impact increased the size of the Earth.
No, the original Earth was smaller than the present version.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
rachelbean
"awesome."
Posts: 15757
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:08 am
About me: I'm a nerd.
Location: Wales, aka not England
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by rachelbean » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:11 pm

devogue wrote:The Moon is definitely necessary for life, for a number of very good reasons:

1) It lights up dark country roads at night so that when drunk people walk home from the pub they don't fall down ditches and die. Drunk people have more sex than sober people and they don't bother with contraception. Bada bing, as they say at Caltech.

2) The Moon enables werewolves to do their shit, culling the really stupid bastards that don't "keep to the path" and ensuring that the gene pool stays strong and healthy.

3) At night time "Moon Rain" falls from the Moon - it's made of Cambazola and it lands all over the countryside. It gets eaten by loony-chompers, the lowest form of molecular life - they in turn shit out lumps of "fotosinthesis" which are nom-nommed by hungry grass, and so on up the food chain.

4) The moon's spinning around the Earth is like a giant ball going round and round. This huge ball distracts our huge cats, the lions, and it stops them from taking over and eating us all.

:awesome: :awesome: :awesome:

:awesome: :lol:
lordpasternack wrote:Yeah - I fuckin' love oppressin' ma wimmin, like I love chowin' on ma bacon and tuggin' on ma ol' cock… ;)
Pappa wrote:God is a cunt! I wank over pictures of Jesus! I love Darwin so much I'd have sex with his bones!!!!
Image

devogue

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by devogue » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:11 pm

RuleBritannia wrote:
SPMaximus wrote:
amused wrote:The moon was originally a part of earth and was knocked away by a big asteroid
And heres a nifty lil' animation showing it
Image

But its only a hypothesis
Wait. The asteroid was bigger than the Moon? That means the impact increased the size of the Earth.
I like the way it "takes a run at it". :awesome:

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by RuleBritannia » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:10 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
RuleBritannia wrote:Wait. The asteroid was bigger than the Moon? That means the impact increased the size of the Earth.
No, the original Earth was smaller than the present version.
How's that different from what I said?
RuleBritannia © MMXI

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:21 pm

RuleBritannia wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
RuleBritannia wrote:Wait. The asteroid was bigger than the Moon? That means the impact increased the size of the Earth.
No, the original Earth was smaller than the present version.
How's that different from what I said?
Just clarifying that A + B = C + D where A is the pre-impact Earth and B is the collider, and C is the post-impact Earth and D is the Moon.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Pensioner
Grumpy old fart.
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:22 am
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by Pensioner » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:30 pm

Bollocks :cranky:
“I wish no harm to any human being, but I, as one man, am going to exercise my freedom of speech. No human being on the face of the earth, no government is going to take from me my right to speak, my right to protest against wrong, my right to do everything that is for the benefit of mankind. I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.”

John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Is the moon necessary for life?

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:47 pm

Pensioner wrote:Bollocks :cranky:
It must have been quite a sight, hey Pen? *jealous*
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests