Evolving the wheel

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by Rum » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:53 pm

pawiz wrote:
Pappa wrote:
AshtonBlack wrote:
Pappa wrote:
AshtonBlack wrote:Interesting question.
I can't think of a circumstance where it could evolve through natural selection, since it hasn't already.
It has several times. The main constrain is blood flow (or fluid transfer) to the moving part. In all cases where it has evolved, the scale was small enough that the fluid issue wasn't a problem.

Stephen J. Gould wrote a good essay on it from what I remember.
At the macro scale?
No. I think Gould gave 2-3 examples, including the flagellum. He gives a clear account of the many things standing in the way of wheels evolving on the macro scale.

It's about 7 years since I read it though, so I don't remember the details.
I mentioned the fucking flagellum but no one took me seriously. Do I have a credibility issue?
I find it strange that you should ask the question. :coffee:

User avatar
cowiz
Shirley
Posts: 16482
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:56 pm
About me: Head up a camels arse
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by cowiz » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:55 pm

Rum wrote: I find it strange that you should ask the question. :coffee:
Phew that's a relief, for a moment I thought I might have had one. Thanks for clarifying
It's a piece of piss to be cowiz, but it's not cowiz to be a piece of piss. Or something like that.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:41 pm

Rum wrote:As I was walking the dogs this evening I found myself marvelling at their leg action and at how evolution had developed locomotion in this form. It got me wondering though.

Do you think that life (on earth) would be able to evolve the wheel as a form of locomotion?
E.E. "Doc" Smith described the Zabriskan Fotema. You may be able to Google that.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

PsychoSerenity
"I" Self-Perceive Recursively
Posts: 7824
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by PsychoSerenity » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:55 pm

Rum wrote:Do you think that life (on earth) would be able to evolve the wheel as a form of locomotion?
How about not on earth? I would imagine it would be more likely on a planet with higher gravity - surfaces might be flatter, and lifting the body on legs would be less efficient. Perhaps some exoskeleton type creature could make the transition to the macro.

There might be alien crabs with wheels somewhere out there right now.

Watching us.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by mistermack » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:50 am

I don't think anything tiny and aquatic really qualifies as a wheel.
To me, a wheel is a thing that rolls along the ground, and carries a load through the axle. So for a true wheel to evolve, the axle or wheel bearing would need to evolve alongside it. And one wheel is pretty useless, you would need at least two, for balance. And what would drive the wheel? You would still need legs, for propulsion, because you couldn't attach muscles directly to the wheel, they would twist up, along with the blood supply.
So you would need something like a rickshaw, with legs for propulsion, and two wheels at the back to carry the load.
And the wheels would have to be seperate from the 'cart', as no blood vessels could go from one to the other.
It's a highly unlikely and unecessary setup.
it would stand more chance in a water creature, where the wheels could be seperate colonies, feeding independently, but there is no advantage of a wheel underwater, as load carrying isn't that important.

So it's no surprise it hasn't evolved in the true sense of a wheel.
.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by Rum » Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:51 am

mistermack wrote:I don't think anything tiny and aquatic really qualifies as a wheel.
To me, a wheel is a thing that rolls along the ground, and carries a load through the axle. So for a true wheel to evolve, the axle or wheel bearing would need to evolve alongside it. And one wheel is pretty useless, you would need at least two, for balance. And what would drive the wheel? You would still need legs, for propulsion, because you couldn't attach muscles directly to the wheel, they would twist up, along with the blood supply.
So you would need something like a rickshaw, with legs for propulsion, and two wheels at the back to carry the load.
And the wheels would have to be seperate from the 'cart', as no blood vessels could go from one to the other.
It's a highly unlikely and unecessary setup.
it would stand more chance in a water creature, where the wheels could be seperate colonies, feeding independently, but there is no advantage of a wheel underwater, as load carrying isn't that important.

So it's no surprise it hasn't evolved in the true sense of a wheel.
.
You raise one intriguing possibility - a symbiotic relationship where the 'wheels' are a different organism, but ultimately both organisms require the other to survive. Best option yet I think, however unlikely.

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by Trolldor » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:58 am

lawl.
"It doesn't fit my definition of a wheel and is therefore not a wheel".
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by Pappa » Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:04 am

mistermack wrote:I don't think anything tiny and aquatic really qualifies as a wheel.
Even if it doesn't qualify as a wheel by a certain definition, it is still the vital precursor of a macro-wheel. Though, for various reasons macro-wheels are seen to be either impossible or so highly improbable they will never evolve, even in an environment in which they would be useful.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
GrahamH
Posts: 921
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:29 pm
Location: South coast, UK
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by GrahamH » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:11 am

This is a sort of wheel, although it has no axle
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1RHmSm3 ... re=related[/youtube]

The problem is the axles. Muscles can't turn axles without a crank or ratchet mechanism, and lubrication and seals are a problem.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:24 pm

GrahamH wrote:This is a sort of wheel, although it has no axle
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1RHmSm3 ... re=related[/youtube]

The problem is the axles. Muscles can't turn axles without a crank or ratchet mechanism, and lubrication and seals are a problem.
So put the muscles on the rim of the wheel. (Think of an octopus-thingy that rolls.)
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
GrahamH
Posts: 921
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:29 pm
Location: South coast, UK
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by GrahamH » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:13 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:So put the muscles on the rim of the wheel. (Think of an octopus-thingy that rolls.)
How about a spider (gravity power only, it seems).
The Golden wheel spider



User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by Rum » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:26 pm

GrahamH wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:So put the muscles on the rim of the wheel. (Think of an octopus-thingy that rolls.)
How about a spider (gravity power only, it seems).
The Golden wheel spider

Well I'll be damned. It isn't a million miles from this to some sort of 'wheel', and nature, as every, does the unpredictable.

User avatar
Thinking Aloud
Page Bottomer
Posts: 20111
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by Thinking Aloud » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:29 pm

The other possibility is that a creature develops the ability to secrete something wheel-like (as a by-product of other secretions no doubt at first) that it can then mount on its legs or elsewhere for motion...

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: Evolving the wheel

Post by Trolldor » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:30 pm

There's no reason a creature can't evolve a wheel operating on an axis, we simply just can't picture how it would work.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests