Is Relativity Reality?

[mistermack]

I hope you're on a respirator, because I don't even think your brain stem can be working.

It boils down to what you believe matter is.
As e=mc2, I'm saying it's energy, locked up. ie, a disturbance in electromagnetic fields, locked into a loop

All very nice, but where did I say what you said I said? Or perhaps you DID change my words? I'm still waiting.
.

[ChildInAZoo]

colubridae, you are so right on the money.

[mistermack]

colubridae, you are so right on the money.

ChildinAZoo, if you're not man enough to admit it when you got it wrong, and don't have enough integrity to apologise, then you and colubridae make a good couple.
I hope you're happy together.
.

[lpetrich]

Actually, you get a *lot* of change if you increase temperature enough. Familiar temperatures don't make much change.

A few thousand K / about a few * 0.1 eV - water molecules dissociate
A little more to millions K / a few hundred eV - atoms dissociate into electrons and nuclei
About 1010 K / 1 MeV - nuclei dissociate into protons and neutrons (nucleons)
About 1013 K / 1 GeV - nucleons dissociate into quarks and gluons

[colubridae]

mistermack is saying that all energy is electromagnetism. Do you agree with this claim? Do either of you have any scientific work that shows that electromagnetism can work to hold the nucleus together?

I don't think I've said that.

Then you need to go back and read what you wrote.

I don't need to, I know I didn't say it. But if you disagree, you can point it out.
Or perhaps you've changed my words?
.

child save your effort for someone worthwhile.


He has zero interest in what he's posting or what is going on in this thread. Jebsus-nail-boy is at the back of it.

As I said before a chimpanzee would have got it by now. He himself said "my main interest is human evolution". He knew shit all about evolution, and has shown no interest in any evolution threads.

[mistermack]

Pawiz posted this link about "warp drive" where you can exceed the speed of light by moving the chunk of spacetime that you occupy, rather than moving THROUGH spacetime.
This is speculation by NASA scientists, a bit of fun I'm sure.

http://www.space.com/businesstechnology ... drive.html

But they are clearly saying that spacetime IS a master reference frame, that we move relative to.
Nice to see NASA scientists coming out with the same 'crap' as me then.
.

[ChildInAZoo]

It's comforting to know that you get your science information from a television station devoted to science fiction.

[mistermack]

Centauri Dreams asked Marc Millis, former head of NASA’s Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Project, for his thoughts on so-called hyperspace propulsion, as recently published in an article called “Take a Leap into Hyperspace” (New Scientist, 5 January 2006).

Too lazy to check your facts again? Seems to be your way of doing things.

[ChildInAZoo]

Sigh.

[mistermack]

Sigh.

I take back what I said earlier about being more specific. Perhaps you SHOULD stick to your usual meaningless vague generalities like "sigh". It seems to be the only kind of comment you can make without putting your foot in it.
.