Boeing 787

Post Reply
User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by Clinton Huxley » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:29 am

I believe the original centre of the Universe was France, which is why all the rest of the Universe rushed away from it the first chance it got.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by Clinton Huxley » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:29 am

I believe the original centre of the Universe was France, which is why all the rest of the Universe rushed away from it the first chance it got.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by JimC » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:30 am

Făkünamę wrote:
JimC wrote:Certainly, I still believe that Geelong is the centre of the known universe...
Well actually any point in the universe will appear to be the centre of the universe when measurements are taken from that point - from which we can hypothesize that the centre of the universe was at one time non-dimensional which makes life rather difficult for the professor at his chalkboard. :levi:
You are so fucking behind the time! :nono:

Whiteboard at the least, or interactive SmartBoard if I'm lucky...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by Jason » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:36 am

JimC wrote:
Făkünamę wrote:
JimC wrote:Certainly, I still believe that Geelong is the centre of the known universe...
Well actually any point in the universe will appear to be the centre of the universe when measurements are taken from that point - from which we can hypothesize that the centre of the universe was at one time non-dimensional which makes life rather difficult for the professor at his chalkboard. :levi:
You are so fucking behind the time! :nono:

Whiteboard at the least, or interactive SmartBoard if I'm lucky...
I blame all society's woes on the fall of the chalkboard. I suppose they don't even issue wooden pointers any longer?

The foundations of civilization. :nono:

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by JimC » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:38 am

Chalkboards had their advantages...

One could hurl the stub of a piece of chalk at a student who had fallen asleep at a crucial stage of one's explanation of quadratic equations...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by Jason » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:42 am

Quadratics are fun, but the real joy comes when you start solving quartics. After quintics the world opens up and you know you can solve any polynomial. You should move up a year. :prof:

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by JimC » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:45 am

Făkünamę wrote:Quadratics are fun, but the real joy comes when you start solving quartics. After quintics the world opens up and you know you can solve any polynomial. You should move up a year. :prof:
Unfortunately, quintics and beyond (except for special cases) are intrinsically insolvable by algebraic methods, as Abel proved all those years ago...

But give me a depressed quartic, and the world's my oyster!
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41041
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by Svartalf » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:46 am

JimC wrote:
Făkünamę wrote:Paging Coito.
What a way to interruptus a thread... :nono:
You could be more reservatus about your opinions :hehe:
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by Jason » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:48 am

JimC wrote:
Făkünamę wrote:Quadratics are fun, but the real joy comes when you start solving quartics. After quintics the world opens up and you know you can solve any polynomial. You should move up a year. :prof:
Unfortunately, quintics and beyond (except for special cases) are intrinsically insolvable by algebraic methods, as Abel proved all those years ago...

But give me a depressed quartic, and the world's my oyster!
You don't get far without being able to solve quintics. I'm guessing that's not a high school subject in Oz. :think:

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by JimC » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:54 am

Făkünamę wrote:
JimC wrote:
Făkünamę wrote:Quadratics are fun, but the real joy comes when you start solving quartics. After quintics the world opens up and you know you can solve any polynomial. You should move up a year. :prof:
Unfortunately, quintics and beyond (except for special cases) are intrinsically insolvable by algebraic methods, as Abel proved all those years ago...

But give me a depressed quartic, and the world's my oyster!
You don't get far without being able to solve quintics. I'm guessing that's not a high school subject in Oz. :think:
One can solve them by a variety of methods, to whatever level of accuracy is required, but not by the application of algebraic methods:
Solving linear, quadratic, cubic and quartic equations by factorization into radicals is fairly straightforward, no matter whether the roots are rational or irrational, real or complex; there are also formulae that yield the required solutions. However, there is no formula for general quintic equations over the rationals in terms of radicals; this is known as the Abel–Ruffini theorem, first published in 1824, which was one of the first applications of group theory in algebra. This result also holds for equations of higher degrees.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintic_function
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by Jason » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:59 am

I take it you're not overly enamoured with them. Cubics are fun.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by JimC » Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:03 am

Făkünamę wrote:I take it you're not overly enamoured with them. Cubics are fun.
I solve cubics for breakfast! :{D

But seriously, I love watching the best of my senior maths students come to grips with this stuff, and realise they can do it easy...

Nothing beats it, I seriously love teaching senior secondary maths to kids that love maths....
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51266
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by Tero » Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:28 am

Continued problems. Here is the main chemistry, and just above that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_io ... ectrolytes

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by Jason » Sat Jul 13, 2013 3:17 am

It's clearly an issue of the decompisition of the electron bonds within the ethylene carbonates which, when used as an electrolyte, become solvent and volatile at high voltages - which is why the failures occured pre-takeoff when the batteries where at full charge.

Elementary chemistry.

User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Boeing 787

Post by Cormac » Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:09 am

"Chalkboard"?

What is a "chalkboard"?
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests