Multiverse Cosmologies?

ChildInAZoo
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Multiverse Cosmologies?

Post by ChildInAZoo » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:10 pm

At least he doesn't lie and say that Minkowski supported multi-verse cosmology.

lpetrich
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Multiverse Cosmologies?

Post by lpetrich » Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:29 pm

Farsight wrote:You're away with the fairies, lpetrich. You believe in garbage for which there is no evidence, you dismiss the evidence in front of your eyes, and you defend your stance with flat-earth accusations and other such nonsense.
A flat-earther could make your sort of arguments, stating that round-earthers dismiss the evidence in front of their eyes. Look around you -- does the Earth's surface look like it has some overall curvature?

The same for the other theories I'd mentioned alongside flat-earthism.

Farsight
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:52 am
Contact:

Re: Multiverse Cosmologies?

Post by Farsight » Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:19 pm

Garbage, lpetrich. I direct them towards my telescope, and they can see the sails of a ship coming up over the horizon. With their own eyes.

ChildInAZoo
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Multiverse Cosmologies?

Post by ChildInAZoo » Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:02 pm

Farsight wrote:Garbage, lpetrich. I direct them towards my telescope, and they can see the sails of a ship coming up over the horizon. With their own eyes.
Not with their own eyes, with a telescope. How do we know that the telescope doesn't distort light? You want to act like there are somethings that are obvious, but you are simply mistaken. This is why we want to see your reasoning and why you are rejected from legitimate science forums when you refuse to actually present your reasoning. For example, though you will probably lie about it again, you were banned from BAUTforums for not answering questions. You were given direct questions there about your reasoning that you failed to answer, even though you posted replies to those questions. You don't seem to understand the difference between posting a reply and answering a question. It might be that you do, though, and your replies are often deliberate evasions because you haven't actually done the reasoning, as you sometimes admit, and you fear the exposure. However, believe me that you stand exposed. Take the time to learn the physics and all will be forgiven.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests