Creative Constraints Test for AI

Post Reply
User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Creative Constraints Test for AI

Post by cronus » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:27 pm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-30144069

Robots face new test of creative abilities

A US professor is proposing a new way to test whether artificial intelligence (AI) is on a par with that of humans.

Currently scientists use the Turing test - named after computer scientist Alan Turing - which evaluates whether an AI can convince a judge that it is human in a conversation.

Prof Mark Riedl, from the Georgia Institute of Technology, is proposing a new test.

It would ask a machine to create a convincing poem, story or painting.

Dubbed Lovelace 2.0 it is an iteration of a previous Lovelace Test, proposed in 2001.

Named after one of the first computer programmers, the original test required an AI to create something that it would be incapable of explaining how it was created.

(continued, can it do something 'new' in that blackswan sense is a real test. Constrained creativity is not creativity at all? It's reality TV...celeb Big brother..)
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41035
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Creative Constraints Test for AI

Post by Svartalf » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:31 pm

c'm on, a donkey is known to have made a convincing painting for the 1910 salon des independants... you bet a compy can do as well...
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60733
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Creative Constraints Test for AI

Post by pErvinalia » Wed Nov 26, 2014 1:33 pm

Scumple wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-30144069

Robots face new test of creative abilities

A US professor is proposing a new way to test whether artificial intelligence (AI) is on a par with that of humans.

Currently scientists use the Turing test - named after computer scientist Alan Turing - which evaluates whether an AI can convince a judge that it is human in a conversation.

Prof Mark Riedl, from the Georgia Institute of Technology, is proposing a new test.

It would ask a machine to create a convincing poem, story or painting.

Dubbed Lovelace 2.0 it is an iteration of a previous Lovelace Test, proposed in 2001.

Named after one of the first computer programmers, the original test required an AI to create something that it would be incapable of explaining how it was created.

(continued, can it do something 'new' in that blackswan sense is a real test. Constrained creativity is not creativity at all? It's reality TV...celeb Big brother..)
That online pomo generator is pretty creative.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Creative Constraints Test for AI

Post by Hermit » Wed Nov 26, 2014 3:13 pm

About as creative as the various sites featuring jabberwacky type chatbots.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests