Timebomb Game Thread

[irretating]

Unvoting and voting for gonzo is spreading the vote, irre.

I'm putting my vote back on who I feel is most likely scum. That it spreads vote is more to do with others being told to put votes on or take them off people.

From what I can tell no-one is being told what to do, we were agreeing to act by consensus which is quite different.

Someone was asked to remove their vote. Was it diva?

[charlou]

Other than the explanations we seem to agree on re the four points added to oblivion and my scores, does anyone have any ideas about traditional mafia roles that may have been adapted to the other point adding/subtracting/adjusting that's been claimed to have gone on overnight?

This question is for everyone, of course.

I already suggested that UT's point removal might be a special who can remove all added votes (not just two) and Bolero's gained point might be a scum or a special who can double the votes (not just add one). That would be more in keeping with the scale of what scum and vig can do.

Yes, and I think that's a plausible thought, too. We'll have more of an idea about that tomorrow, I hope.

I was specifically asking about the kind of roles people think we may have in play that can carry out these abilities, because that may help us work out what's going on overnight.

[charlou]

Unvoting and voting for gonzo is spreading the vote, irre.

I'm putting my vote back on who I feel is most likely scum. That it spreads vote is more to do with others being told to put votes on or take them off people.

From what I can tell no-one is being told what to do, we were agreeing to act by consensus which is quite different.

Someone was asked to remove their vote. Was it diva?

She wasn't specificallly asked .. it was pointed out that it would be more pressure on Mantis if she were at close to being armed, rather than armed.

Are you reading the posts, irre?

[oblivion]

Unvoting and voting for gonzo is spreading the vote, irre.

I'm putting my vote back on who I feel is most likely scum. That it spreads vote is more to do with others being told to put votes on or take them off people.

From what I can tell no-one is being told what to do, we were agreeing to act by consensus which is quite different.

Someone was asked to remove their vote. Was it diva?

I asked if she'd consider it when UT suggested keeping mantis just below armed.

Now she's 2 below.

[divagreen]

unvote vote Mantis

[charlou]

geez, I had my vote on gonzo originally.

I don't agree with this vote spreading tactic. I think we should play as if we intend to lynch. And I think gonzo should be lynched.

unvote vote gonzo

Where's your case to lynch Gonzo? Why this vote change at the last moment with a rationale about being against vote spreading that doesn't match what you're doing?

My case on Gonzo is mainly meta (and no, before you ask, not unfair meta). But actually, his style this game is much more similar to his style of his first game here where he was scum. He seems to be focusing on small things to comment on, like on bolero for instance.

Fair enough .. why switch your vote to him at the last moment while at the same time saying you disagree with vote spreading?

[charlou]

irre, where was your vote before you unvoted and switched to Gonzo?

[divagreen]

well if Charlou is a town Doc and that works normally , and we have a vig (the 4 point thing ) what other roles do you think are out there to add or remove points , I thought about scum being able to an add a point each ,but surely that's unfair as each day/night scum would get 2 votes . Trackers seers etc all the info roles would work as normal but this single point stuff I don't understand ? For one thing If someone Removed points last night then we have a lot of roles in play .We have a doc a vig an Sk and a role blocker plus whoever added points and whoever removed points and that's without a Seer . I think some people have been lying about their points score !

We don't have a serial killer Feck, the OP has clearly stated that we have no indies.

We seem to have weird vig roles.

[Zigmen]

Nightfall

Voting ends, but discussion may continue. A roster will be posted shortly.

[divagreen]

And why are you convinced that we do not have a seer?

Where the heck are you getting all of this info?

[oblivion]

Char, re the meta, I'm pretty much discounting his reaction to the early bandwagon on day 1. I'm thinking about his passionate arguments with slim, bey, adam and mickthinks late on day 1 and all through day 2 regarding the Jerome bandwagon on day 1.

[irretating]

geez, I had my vote on gonzo originally.

I don't agree with this vote spreading tactic. I think we should play as if we intend to lynch. And I think gonzo should be lynched.

unvote vote gonzo

Where's your case to lynch Gonzo? Why this vote change at the last moment with a rationale about being against vote spreading that doesn't match what you're doing?

My case on Gonzo is mainly meta (and no, before you ask, not unfair meta). But actually, his style this game is much more similar to his style of his first game here where he was scum. He seems to be focusing on small things to comment on, like on bolero for instance.

Fair enough .. why switch your vote to him at the last moment while at the same time saying you disagree with vote spreading?

Oblivion and UT are trying to aim for vote spreading, with this 'take someone to just under being armed'. I don't agree with that, I think we need to play pretty much a standard game (if I'm being thick for doing that please say so). Seeing that in action spurred me to put my vote back on who I think it should be on today.

[oblivion]

And why are you convinced that we do not have a seer?

Where the heck are you getting all of this info?

who is this addressed to?

[divagreen]

And why are you convinced that we do not have a seer?

Where the heck are you getting all of this info?

who is this addressed to?

Feck.

[divagreen]

Nevermind, I reread it and absorbed the context.

Sorry Feck.