Dune 2.0 Game Thread

[MissingNo.]

You don't need to delete the character names and the relationships. You can copy all of the messages quickly from your inbox. They all appear at the bottom of the most recent received message. Also, it took you 15 minutes to rescind three phrases? This seems like stalling.

[Miss Anne Thrope]

Here are the rest of them:

So what do you think about CJ and 95theses claims? If CJ is a seer and he has tested Virphen then those two can be trusted...same with 95Theses and irre. Problem is the only way to test it is if one of them is killed and turns up to be what CJ and 95 have said they are.



I saw our names mentioned earlier as being suspect for not posting much, but it seems they have narrowed it down a bit and our names have been dropped. Not sure whether to come out now with my status, leaving out the role and let 95 test it or to stay quiet another day and see what happens during this day round and next night round.



If CJ is the seer, then if he gets killed apparently I would replace him, so it's not a major disaster if that happens. However I think we should leave them to bitch it out with each other on the game thread for a while yet. If they put us back on the suspicious list, then we could state we are with the town, and 95Theses can investigate our claims, if he is who he says he is.

At the moment sifaka is top of my suspicious list. Her comments seem to have an air of misdirection about them, but it's just a hunch on my part




And now I'm the town seer. So who should I investigate?




Has 95Theses been investigated yet? If not, I would go with him. Knowing he is with us would also prove all the people he has looked into. Sifaka is another that is on both of our radar, and her vote against you today is either revenge or she is afraid you may know something.



I investigated 95Theses as you suggested. He is loyal to the Atreides and town.




Guess I should have seen his death coming, but oh well. Looks like I'm the sacraficial lamb for today so far. If it comes down to me being killed today, then I was thinknig that I should tell people who you are and what your abilities are so once they see I am innocent they will trust you. Let me know what you think. You may be next to die that night, but at least you'll get one investigation in before hand. On the plus side, between the two of us, we have three votes so depending on how the others vote, we could have a chance to reverse their decision and choose someone else.




I think we should perhaps tell them that we have been able to PM each other, but not give away too much other information about our roles.




Three votes against me now. I hope I can change some minds before the end of the round. The problem with telling them we can PM is that I think most believe only the killers can PM. Maybe I could say that there is someone else who can investigate people without giving away a name. After that it would be up to you to convince them that it is you.

Anyway, I am really starting to distrust Mantis and normal. mantis for reasons stated earlier and Normal because he seems to be trying hard to steer the crowd and get in good with the cleared players, acting like he is just as innocent as they are even though he hasn't been cleared yet. I was going to vote for one of them today and hopfully be able to convince someone else to vote with me. With our 3 votes I would only need to convince 2 others.



I'm willing to change my vote to one of them, if you think we can persuade the others to do so.

[MissingNo.]

Those PMs seem legit. I'm a little weary of how long it took you to post them, though. What does everyone else think?

[Miss Anne Thrope]

Those PMs seem legit. I'm a little weary of how long it took you to post them, though. What does everyone else think?

I've only made 26 posts here - 27 if you include this one. I'm not exactly dynamite with the control system yet. Luckily noncredo PMed me the rest of them.

[MissingNo.]

But you had been PMing Irreligionist last game plus all these PMs between you and noncredo. I find it a bit difficult to believe that you haven't seen the message history yet.

[Miss Anne Thrope]

But you had been PMing Irreligionist last game plus all these PMs between you and noncredo. I find it a bit difficult to believe that you haven't seen the message history yet.

Well, I hadn't. I can hardly prove it one way or the other.

[noncredo]

You don't need to delete the character names and the relationships.

I agree with heyzues here. It seems revealing roles at this time isn't very risky since either me or MAT will be more than likely be killed tonight. At least once that happens the other will be trusted and the town will have a chance. How many scum can there be? It has be getting close by now I would think.

[irreligionist]

I believe MAT and noncredo. Ksen, heyzeus and I are cleared. That leaves sifaka normal and mantis. I've been susspicious of normal for a while, and sifaka/mantis game play leaves it hard to decide guilt

Who do we lynch?

[ksen]

I believe MAT and noncredo. Ksen, heyzeus and I are cleared. That leaves sifaka normal and mantis. I've been susspicious of normal for a while, and sifaka/mantis game play leaves it hard to decide guilt

Who do we lynch?

Let's do a Normal lynch tonight. If that doesn't end the game then we can lynch whomever the Vig doesn't kill.

[MissingNo.]

But you had been PMing Irreligionist last game plus all these PMs between you and noncredo. I find it a bit difficult to believe that you haven't seen the message history yet.

Well, I hadn't. I can hardly prove it one way or the other.

I appreciate you can't offer evidence but it's something that has to be considered. For the record, I'm beginning to believe you but I need to give it some more thought.

[MissingNo.]

I believe MAT and noncredo. Ksen, heyzeus and I are cleared. That leaves sifaka normal and mantis. I've been susspicious of normal for a while, and sifaka/mantis game play leaves it hard to decide guilt

Who do we lynch?

Let's do a Normal lynch tonight. If that doesn't end the game then we can lynch whomever the Vig doesn't kill.

Why on earth would we lynch Normal?

[irreligionist]

MAT hadn't PMd me last game.

Bummer your investigation was wasted last night.

BTW who did the hooker visit last night? Or was evil Spock the hooker?

[MissingNo.]

MAT hadn't PMd me last game.

Bummer your investigation was wasted last night.

BTW who did the hooker visit last night? Or was evil Spock the hooker?

Evil Spock was the recruiter. I thought you were regularly conversing with MAT and spinoza last game.

[sifaka]

unvote noncredo

for now..

Other innocents should unvote as a sign of faith.. especially sifaka

I haven't voted for anyone yet!

[ksen]

I believe MAT and noncredo. Ksen, heyzeus and I are cleared. That leaves sifaka normal and mantis. I've been susspicious of normal for a while, and sifaka/mantis game play leaves it hard to decide guilt

Who do we lynch?

Let's do a Normal lynch tonight. If that doesn't end the game then we can lynch whomever the Vig doesn't kill.

Why on earth would we lynch Normal?

Because both Irre and myself have been suspicious of him?

We need to lynch someone. If we lynch Normal and he's town he still wins the game with Town when we win.

Anyway, I'm heading home. I'll check in later to see who we want to lynch. If it's someone else I'll change my vote to keep he bloc together.

But for now:

vote Normal