Stargate SG1 - game thread

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Locked
User avatar
Bilirubin
No Kill I!!!
Posts: 443
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:19 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by Bilirubin » Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:48 pm

She's kind of drawing a lot of attention to herself, which scum tend not to do. Not sure I've seen her scum game yet, but if this is it its worse that gib's. Might be worth considering some of the votes on her BW, the hit and runs by higgs and gonzo in particular.

User avatar
MattShizzle
Posts: 466
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 3:08 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by MattShizzle » Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:53 pm

Azathoth wrote:
Zigmen wrote:
MattShizzle wrote:I'm also wondering what's with all the random votes.
What sort of votes would not qualify as random on Day 1?
Ones with any sort of reasoning behind them. Coming straight out and slapping a random vote on someone before any discussion at all is bullshit.
This. And rather scummy to boot.

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by Don't Panic » Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:00 pm

Zigmen wrote:
Don't Panic wrote: Self voting is scummy by convention, like 3rd or 4th on the bw being scum, rules of thumb are wrong more often than right, irre hasn't posted enough yet for me to read her either way so a mayor vote gets people talking, as does a lynch vote.

##Vote Irre##

But, surprisingly, not so much for the self-vote.
More so for apologizing that she broke Guapo's rule.
The apology seems a bit too glittery.
What's guapos rule?
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
divagreen
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:20 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by divagreen » Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:01 pm

Don't Panic wrote:
Zigmen wrote:
Don't Panic wrote: Self voting is scummy by convention, like 3rd or 4th on the bw being scum, rules of thumb are wrong more often than right, irre hasn't posted enough yet for me to read her either way so a mayor vote gets people talking, as does a lynch vote.

##Vote Irre##

But, surprisingly, not so much for the self-vote.
More so for apologizing that she broke Guapo's rule.
The apology seems a bit too glittery.
What's guapos rule?
Don't answer for other people, allow them to answer for themselves.
Currently suffers from Cassandra's curse.

b.ternarius
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by b.ternarius » Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:07 pm

Azathoth wrote:
Zigmen wrote:
MattShizzle wrote:I'm also wondering what's with all the random votes.
What sort of votes would not qualify as random on Day 1?
Ones with any sort of reasoning behind them. Coming straight out and slapping a random vote on someone before any discussion at all is bullshit.
Gotta agree, if only because I said something similar about day one town lynch votes not being terribly significant in the Innsmouth game on day one and was damn near lynched over it. I learned. So why are we getting a little pack of random voters? If it's all sort of in-group teasing, it's going to be confusing for non ingroupers, guys.

User avatar
divagreen
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:20 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by divagreen » Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:08 pm

MattShizzle wrote:
Azathoth wrote:
Zigmen wrote:
MattShizzle wrote:I'm also wondering what's with all the random votes.
What sort of votes would not qualify as random on Day 1?
Ones with any sort of reasoning behind them. Coming straight out and slapping a random vote on someone before any discussion at all is bullshit.
This. And rather scummy to boot.
Matt, you are being uber followy there, buddy.
Currently suffers from Cassandra's curse.

User avatar
divagreen
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:20 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by divagreen » Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:14 pm

b.ternarius wrote:
Azathoth wrote:
Zigmen wrote:
MattShizzle wrote:I'm also wondering what's with all the random votes.
What sort of votes would not qualify as random on Day 1?
Ones with any sort of reasoning behind them. Coming straight out and slapping a random vote on someone before any discussion at all is bullshit.
Gotta agree, if only because I said something similar about day one town lynch votes not being terribly significant in the Innsmouth game on day one and was damn near lynched over it. I learned. So why are we getting a little pack of random voters? If it's all sort of in-group teasing, it's going to be confusing for non ingroupers, guys.
What is honestly bugging me is that Aza felt the need to poin it out when I have seen Aza himself do this. He is acting like he has never seen this before and therefore it kind of looks to me like is distancing himself in a subtle way while seeming active. It also sets up for a genral tone of future suspicion; he can point later and say, "that looked scummy" when it just looks like the usual d1 'everyone trying to stick out their feelers and see what happens' to me.
Currently suffers from Cassandra's curse.

b.ternarius
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by b.ternarius » Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:19 pm

Okay, but I still think if not scummy it's not good practice.

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by Zigmen » Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:45 pm

I have to go to work soon. I'll be back before nightfall, thanks to the time extension.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
Azathoth
blind idiot god
blind idiot god
Posts: 9418
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by Azathoth » Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:06 pm

divagreen wrote:
b.ternarius wrote:
Azathoth wrote:
Zigmen wrote:
MattShizzle wrote:I'm also wondering what's with all the random votes.
What sort of votes would not qualify as random on Day 1?
Ones with any sort of reasoning behind them. Coming straight out and slapping a random vote on someone before any discussion at all is bullshit.
Gotta agree, if only because I said something similar about day one town lynch votes not being terribly significant in the Innsmouth game on day one and was damn near lynched over it. I learned. So why are we getting a little pack of random voters? If it's all sort of in-group teasing, it's going to be confusing for non ingroupers, guys.
What is honestly bugging me is that Aza felt the need to poin it out when I have seen Aza himself do this. He is acting like he has never seen this before and therefore it kind of looks to me like is distancing himself in a subtle way while seeming active. It also sets up for a genral tone of future suspicion; he can point later and say, "that looked scummy" when it just looks like the usual d1 'everyone trying to stick out their feelers and see what happens' to me.
There is a difference between poking a quiet one with a vote later in the day and a the first couple of pages being nothing but random votes. No discussion, nothing
Outside the ordered universe is that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.

Code: Select all

// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis 
   $str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);

User avatar
divagreen
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:20 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by divagreen » Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:24 pm

Azathoth wrote:
divagreen wrote:What is honestly bugging me is that Aza felt the need to poin it out when I have seen Aza himself do this. He is acting like he has never seen this before and therefore it kind of looks to me like is distancing himself in a subtle way while seeming active. It also sets up for a genral tone of future suspicion; he can point later and say, "that looked scummy" when it just looks like the usual d1 'everyone trying to stick out their feelers and see what happens' to me.
There is a difference between poking a quiet one with a vote later in the day and a the first couple of pages being nothing but random votes. No discussion, nothing
Uh...I seem to remember you voting for me early in the game just so you could watch me flail all day.

I am less concerned aboout those and more concerned about the shoddy reason votes. For instance, what do you think of Gonzo's reason for voting Irre? Especially considering he self-mayor voted in the Russian Roulette game? He was town in that game. I have a big fat FOS on him at the mo.
Currently suffers from Cassandra's curse.

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by Don't Panic » Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:45 pm

divagreen wrote:
Don't Panic wrote:
Zigmen wrote:
Don't Panic wrote: Self voting is scummy by convention, like 3rd or 4th on the bw being scum, rules of thumb are wrong more often than right, irre hasn't posted enough yet for me to read her either way so a mayor vote gets people talking, as does a lynch vote.

##Vote Irre##

But, surprisingly, not so much for the self-vote.
More so for apologizing that she broke Guapo's rule.
The apology seems a bit too glittery.
What's guapos rule?
Don't answer for other people, allow them to answer for themselves.
Makes sense.

Anyway, ##unvote feck##

Time for food, and a leisurely read.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
r.c
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:17 pm
Location: India/Texas
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by r.c » Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:15 pm

Voting amok as mayor for being MVP in the last game.

@@vote amok@@

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by Feck » Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:25 pm

Zigmen just posted about a conspiracy to see if anyone would jump in his Wifom ...that Pings a little .
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Bilirubin
No Kill I!!!
Posts: 443
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:19 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 1

Post by Bilirubin » Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:27 pm

Feck wrote:Zigmen just posted about a conspiracy to see if anyone would jump in his Wifom ...that Pings a little .
How so?

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests