Ok...I am not well versed in TNG. So the names mean nothing to me. I know very little and had to look up my own character/role.Uselesstwit wrote:actually if riker was a safename claim, i'm thinking we should take ani's out with a bit more skepticism.
Star Trek TNG
Moderator: Mafia Mods
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
OB would have changed those safe names !Uselesstwit wrote:actually if riker was a safename claim, i'm thinking we should take ani's out with a bit more skepticism.




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
I'm going to vote Gallstones. She has contributed like 3 words all day, and nothing of substance. Hopefully I won't change my mind in like an hour again but it may happen.
- Uselesstwit
- Posts: 2290
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
right I'm not saying riker is still a safename, I'm saying that if a character like riker can be a safe name, picard could also be? I think it's unlikely but maybe I shouldn't have given as much wait to ani's out as I did.Feck wrote:OB would have changed those safe names !Uselesstwit wrote:actually if riker was a safename claim, i'm thinking we should take ani's out with a bit more skepticism.
irretating wrote:you're a genius, UT!
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
Or at least some of them.Feck wrote:OB would have changed those safe names !Uselesstwit wrote:actually if riker was a safename claim, i'm thinking we should take ani's out with a bit more skepticism.
I can confirm riker was one of the scum safenames.
Along with Dr. Crusher and LaForge.
But I don't see how thats bertantet to this game as it's brobably random.

^^Hey look..new letter trick.
Auspicious Curmudgeon
- Uselesstwit
- Posts: 2290
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
we should probably stop talking about the last incarnation of the game, it's getting to the point we could break this one with that info.
irretating wrote:you're a genius, UT!
- Don't Panic
- Evil Admin
- Posts: 10653
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
- About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
- Location: Luimneach, Eire
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
Bedtime for me kids, gone 2am here.
Before I go, I'm going to unvote Denny
and Vote Morticia
This just seems too much like dumping a safe vote to appear active to me:
Before I go, I'm going to unvote Denny
and Vote Morticia
This just seems too much like dumping a safe vote to appear active to me:
Morticia wrote:I'm going to vote Gallstones. She has contributed like 3 words all day, and nothing of substance. Hopefully I won't change my mind in like an hour again but it may happen.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
That's why I didn't warn the real Picard not to out I thought OB would be mad at me .Uselesstwit wrote:we should probably stop talking about the last incarnation of the game, it's getting to the point we could break this one with that info.




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- Rob
- Carpe Diem
- Posts: 2558
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:49 am
- About me: Just a man in love with science and the pursuit of knowledge.
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
Sorry I have a lot going on recently with real life and really am not into mafia right this second. Please sub me, sorry.
I can live with doubt, and uncertainty, and not knowing. I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. [...] I don’t feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is, as far as I can tell, possibly. It doesn’t frighten me. - Richard Feynman
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
I'm 99,9% sure enough sure that enough was changed that all it would create is WIFOM.Uselesstwit wrote:we should probably stop talking about the last incarnation of the game, it's getting to the point we could break this one with that info.
Usless info IMHO.
Good night.
Auspicious Curmudgeon
- Uselesstwit
- Posts: 2290
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
I really really agree with this.Don't Panic wrote:Bedtime for me kids, gone 2am here.
Before I go, I'm going to unvote Denny
and Vote Morticia
This just seems too much like dumping a safe vote to appear active to me:Morticia wrote:I'm going to vote Gallstones. She has contributed like 3 words all day, and nothing of substance. Hopefully I won't change my mind in like an hour again but it may happen.
vote mort.
irretating wrote:you're a genius, UT!
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
Outing a counter claim has nothing to do with the broke game. If it's a mason roll. as it would seem you have BM with them, then out with it and Ani can then move back to the ubber scum list.Feck wrote:That's why I didn't warn the real Picard not to out I thought OB would be mad at me .Uselesstwit wrote:we should probably stop talking about the last incarnation of the game, it's getting to the point we could break this one with that info.
Auspicious Curmudgeon
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
Gallstones never plays a protown game ... which is frustrating when she's town, but will stand her in good stead when she plays scum ... which could be this game.Morticia wrote:If you have been here on and off all day how come you only posted a good morning comment earlier and nothing else?Gallstones wrote:Morticia wrote:I know that was addressed to Higgs. I should have addressed mine to her also.Uselesstwit wrote:that last was addressed to higgs, but anyone is welcome to do so also.
PS Where the fuck is Galls hiding? SR too for that matter.
I haven't been hiding, I have been here off and on all day.
Can't speak for anybody else.

no fences
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
Higgs claimed she was blocked .. I too was visited and got a similar PM ... I have no special role so was not prevented from doing anything.Feck wrote:Oh ok only one person blocked ..I'm still trying to get my head around the whole Denny Dp thingUselesstwit wrote:who was the first role blocker?Feck wrote:So know we have a Tracker and another role blocker ?
I'm assuming we may have both a town and a scum blocker.
no fences
- Uselesstwit
- Posts: 2290
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
- Contact:
Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)
i want to know this also feck. if you know that ani isn't the real picard, why isn't your vote on him?DennyB wrote:Outing a counter claim has nothing to do with the broke game. If it's a mason roll. as it would seem you have BM with them, then out with it and Ani can then move back to the ubber scum list.Feck wrote:That's why I didn't warn the real Picard not to out I thought OB would be mad at me .Uselesstwit wrote:we should probably stop talking about the last incarnation of the game, it's getting to the point we could break this one with that info.
irretating wrote:you're a genius, UT!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests