Star Trek TNG

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
Morticia
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by Morticia » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:07 am

Uselesstwit wrote:actually if riker was a safename claim, i'm thinking we should take ani's out with a bit more skepticism.
Ok...I am not well versed in TNG. So the names mean nothing to me. I know very little and had to look up my own character/role.

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by Feck » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:07 am

Uselesstwit wrote:actually if riker was a safename claim, i'm thinking we should take ani's out with a bit more skepticism.
OB would have changed those safe names !
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Morticia
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by Morticia » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:10 am

I'm going to vote Gallstones. She has contributed like 3 words all day, and nothing of substance. Hopefully I won't change my mind in like an hour again but it may happen.

User avatar
Uselesstwit
Posts: 2290
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by Uselesstwit » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:12 am

Feck wrote:
Uselesstwit wrote:actually if riker was a safename claim, i'm thinking we should take ani's out with a bit more skepticism.
OB would have changed those safe names !
right I'm not saying riker is still a safename, I'm saying that if a character like riker can be a safe name, picard could also be? I think it's unlikely but maybe I shouldn't have given as much wait to ani's out as I did.
irretating wrote:you're a genius, UT!

User avatar
DennyB
Posts: 1205
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 4:30 am
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by DennyB » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:15 am

Feck wrote:
Uselesstwit wrote:actually if riker was a safename claim, i'm thinking we should take ani's out with a bit more skepticism.
OB would have changed those safe names !
Or at least some of them.
I can confirm riker was one of the scum safenames.
Along with Dr. Crusher and LaForge.
But I don't see how thats bertantet to this game as it's brobably random. :pardon:

^^Hey look..new letter trick.
Auspicious Curmudgeon

User avatar
Uselesstwit
Posts: 2290
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by Uselesstwit » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:17 am

we should probably stop talking about the last incarnation of the game, it's getting to the point we could break this one with that info.
irretating wrote:you're a genius, UT!

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by Don't Panic » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:18 am

Bedtime for me kids, gone 2am here.

Before I go, I'm going to unvote Denny

and Vote Morticia

This just seems too much like dumping a safe vote to appear active to me:
Morticia wrote:I'm going to vote Gallstones. She has contributed like 3 words all day, and nothing of substance. Hopefully I won't change my mind in like an hour again but it may happen.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by Feck » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:20 am

Uselesstwit wrote:we should probably stop talking about the last incarnation of the game, it's getting to the point we could break this one with that info.
That's why I didn't warn the real Picard not to out I thought OB would be mad at me .
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Rob
Carpe Diem
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:49 am
About me: Just a man in love with science and the pursuit of knowledge.
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by Rob » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:21 am

Sorry I have a lot going on recently with real life and really am not into mafia right this second. Please sub me, sorry.
I can live with doubt, and uncertainty, and not knowing. I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. [...] I don’t feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is, as far as I can tell, possibly. It doesn’t frighten me. - Richard Feynman

User avatar
DennyB
Posts: 1205
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 4:30 am
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by DennyB » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:22 am

Uselesstwit wrote:we should probably stop talking about the last incarnation of the game, it's getting to the point we could break this one with that info.
I'm 99,9% sure enough sure that enough was changed that all it would create is WIFOM.
Usless info IMHO.

Good night.
Auspicious Curmudgeon

User avatar
Uselesstwit
Posts: 2290
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by Uselesstwit » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:23 am

Don't Panic wrote:Bedtime for me kids, gone 2am here.

Before I go, I'm going to unvote Denny

and Vote Morticia

This just seems too much like dumping a safe vote to appear active to me:
Morticia wrote:I'm going to vote Gallstones. She has contributed like 3 words all day, and nothing of substance. Hopefully I won't change my mind in like an hour again but it may happen.
I really really agree with this.

vote mort.
irretating wrote:you're a genius, UT!

User avatar
DennyB
Posts: 1205
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 4:30 am
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by DennyB » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:27 am

Feck wrote:
Uselesstwit wrote:we should probably stop talking about the last incarnation of the game, it's getting to the point we could break this one with that info.
That's why I didn't warn the real Picard not to out I thought OB would be mad at me .
Outing a counter claim has nothing to do with the broke game. If it's a mason roll. as it would seem you have BM with them, then out with it and Ani can then move back to the ubber scum list.
Auspicious Curmudgeon

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by charlou » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:29 am

Morticia wrote:
Gallstones wrote:
Morticia wrote:
Uselesstwit wrote:that last was addressed to higgs, but anyone is welcome to do so also.
I know that was addressed to Higgs. I should have addressed mine to her also.

PS Where the fuck is Galls hiding? SR too for that matter.

I haven't been hiding, I have been here off and on all day.
Can't speak for anybody else.
If you have been here on and off all day how come you only posted a good morning comment earlier and nothing else?
Gallstones never plays a protown game ... which is frustrating when she's town, but will stand her in good stead when she plays scum ... which could be this game. :ddpan:
no fences

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by charlou » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:31 am

Feck wrote:
Uselesstwit wrote:
Feck wrote:So know we have a Tracker and another role blocker ?
who was the first role blocker?
Oh ok only one person blocked ..I'm still trying to get my head around the whole Denny Dp thing :think:
Higgs claimed she was blocked .. I too was visited and got a similar PM ... I have no special role so was not prevented from doing anything.

I'm assuming we may have both a town and a scum blocker.
no fences

User avatar
Uselesstwit
Posts: 2290
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
Contact:

Re: Star Trek TNG Mark II - Day 2 (Q Who?)

Post by Uselesstwit » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:31 am

DennyB wrote:
Feck wrote:
Uselesstwit wrote:we should probably stop talking about the last incarnation of the game, it's getting to the point we could break this one with that info.
That's why I didn't warn the real Picard not to out I thought OB would be mad at me .
Outing a counter claim has nothing to do with the broke game. If it's a mason roll. as it would seem you have BM with them, then out with it and Ani can then move back to the ubber scum list.
i want to know this also feck. if you know that ani isn't the real picard, why isn't your vote on him?
irretating wrote:you're a genius, UT!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests