Tea Party vs Zombie game thread

[amok]

Thinking back, I voted ksen quite early, and also claimed to be Zombie in a jokey way, before we realized it was an issue.

However, I also voted to lynch an innocent praying (but to be honest I still can't figure out why she was being so evasive and unhelpful), and I was also FOSing an innocent vofw.

I suppose it might be because I revealed my item (I called it a gift) was stolen, and now that others are confirming they have gifts as well, there are too many for all to be Scum - the game would be over.

[b.ternarius]

Praying was probably using her phone to post; she often has to, and I probably should have considered that. But she did seem evasive.

[b.ternarius]

I am going to

##vote def##

for now. I hope we haven't gone hopelessly astray as town. <<worrysecondguessworry...>>

[Magicziggy]

You are looking more scummy by the minute b.t.
You come out first breath calling "brainz". Turns out this is an item possessed by mantis.
This gives a lead in for ksen to blunder.
You claim vanilla, which in my book is a no no, even if it's accepted at tr.
You ask for info on who has gifts. Why do you think making that knowledge public benefits town exactly.
You um and r over me but plump for def on what evidence exactly? And you steer me away from mantis.

[def]

I am going to

##vote def##

for now. I hope we haven't gone hopelessly astray as town. <<worrysecondguessworry...>>

You totally have, but I won't hold that against you

Once again, I'm amazed at how clear and logical arguments get interpreted as scum moves. Next time I play here as town, I'll be sure not to vote for scum, since it's an obvious scum tell, apparently

[b.ternarius]

You are looking more scummy by the minute b.t.
You come out first breath calling "brainz". Turns out this is an item possessed by mantis.
This gives a lead in for ksen to blunder.
You claim vanilla, which in my book is a no no, even if it's accepted at tr.
You ask for info on who has gifts. Why do you think making that knowledge public benefits town exactly.
You um and r over me but plump for def on what evidence exactly? And you steer me away from mantis.

mz, what?

It gave a lead in for ksen to blunder? You think scum decided to manufature a lynch for ksen on the first day? how would that make any sense, leaving one (probably, given there were only ten players) scum to finish the game?

I claimed van, town to make sure everyone understood why ksen's blunder was really serious.I think the thief is most likely a town role - again, small game, balance, etc..

Plumping for def instead of you because it's fifty fifty at the moment and town will likely agree on def.

[amok]

it was brains that were stolen from me last night.

Brains? Brains were stolen from you last night? Colour me skeptical, but that sounds a bit odd.

[b.ternarius]

I am going to

##vote def##

for now. I hope we haven't gone hopelessly astray as town. <<worrysecondguessworry...>>

You totally have, but I won't hold that against you

Once again, I'm amazed at how clear and logical arguments get interpreted as scum moves. Next time I play here as town, I'll be sure not to vote for scum, since it's an obvious scum tell, apparently

Maybe.

Def, you defend yourself when fos'd, but you're not providing much reason to pick someone else that's scummier.

Voting for scum can indeed be a scumtell if there's already a bw or if scum is playing a bussing game, and depending on when the vote is cast. It's no clear indication of innocence to climb a bw when the results are looking inevitable.

[Magicziggy]

Well it's def or mantis then. Not much has changed for me in three days. I'm town. I have an object. Normally brown I think.

[b.ternarius]

it was brains that were stolen from me last night.

Brains? Brains were stolen from you last night? Colour me skeptical, but that sounds a bit odd.

Why? Do you think the objects themselves have clues attached? I doubt it - zigmen isn't given to handing out clues of that sort in mafia.

[amok]

I am going to

##vote def##

for now. I hope we haven't gone hopelessly astray as town. <<worrysecondguessworry...>>

You totally have, but I won't hold that against you

Once again, I'm amazed at how clear and logical arguments get interpreted as scum moves. Next time I play here as town, I'll be sure not to vote for scum, since it's an obvious scum tell, apparently

Maybe.

Def, you defend yourself when fos'd, but you're not providing much reason to pick someone else that's scummier.

Voting for scum can indeed be a scumtell if there's already a bw or if scum is playing a bussing game, and depending on when the vote is cast. It's no clear indication of innocence to climb a bw when the results are looking inevitable.

Def was the second player to vote for ksen. There was no bandwagon yet.

[amok]

I can't decide whether to vote to lynch the person I think is the Thief or the the person I think is Scum.

[Magicziggy]

mz, what?

It gave a lead in for ksen to blunder? You think scum decided to manufature a lynch for ksen on the first day? how would that make any sense, leaving one (probably, given there were only ten players) scum to finish the game?

if I were scum, I would dream up such a ploy. Maybe not any more. I've done it once. Not again.

[b.ternarius]

mz, what?

It gave a lead in for ksen to blunder? You think scum decided to manufature a lynch for ksen on the first day? how would that make any sense, leaving one (probably, given there were only ten players) scum to finish the game?

if I were scum, I would dream up such a ploy. Maybe not any more. I've done it once. Not again.

It still doesn't make sense. You don't toss half your team under the bus day one.

[Magicziggy]

That's true.