Stargate SG1 - game thread

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Locked
User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by Zigmen » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:07 pm

BTW my students are all late or out today. Gotta love August.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by Zigmen » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:09 pm

ksen wrote:You should have guapo draft a post-game PM that you can send to bili. :D
Nah. I plan to be obvective as possible. Guapo would be too scathing.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by Zigmen » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:27 pm

I think we should mass character claim.

Objections?
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
Athene
Posts: 564
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by Athene » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:30 pm

That doesn't answer my question actually. When ob has designed a game with a sk who has a town incompatible win condition, she has always given the town win condition as ''eliminate all threats'' or words to that effect.

We should have lynched amok last night, if she was telling the truth then we would know we are dealing with another threat to town apart from scum.

User avatar
r.c
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:17 pm
Location: India/Texas
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by r.c » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:37 pm

Athene wrote:That doesn't answer my question actually. When ob has designed a game with a sk who has a town incompatible win condition, she has always given the town win condition as ''eliminate all threats'' or words to that effect.

We should have lynched amok last night, if she was telling the truth then we would know we are dealing with another threat to town apart from scum.
An sk aligned with town is equivalent to a town vig. If the game doesn't get over after we eliminate the scum we can always lynch her later. Our primary objective should be to go after scum.

User avatar
Athene
Posts: 564
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by Athene » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:46 pm

r.c wrote:
Athene wrote:That doesn't answer my question actually. When ob has designed a game with a sk who has a town incompatible win condition, she has always given the town win condition as ''eliminate all threats'' or words to that effect.

We should have lynched amok last night, if she was telling the truth then we would know we are dealing with another threat to town apart from scum.
An sk aligned with town is equivalent to a town vig. If the game doesn't get over after we eliminate the scum we can always lynch her later. Our primary objective should be to go after scum.
Yes, and I've been in a game where that was the case and in that game the town win condition was to kill scum, not eliminate all threats. and the sk was a survivor. You were in that game too, you should be aware of this.

User avatar
Athene
Posts: 564
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by Athene » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:46 pm

Zigmen wrote:I think we should mass character claim.

Objections?
none

User avatar
r.c
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:17 pm
Location: India/Texas
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by r.c » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:55 pm

Zigmen wrote: Do you think Oblivion would give these characters as safe-claims to Scum?

Does ob give out safe claims to scum. If yes there would be no point in outing your character names. But I don't mind anyway.

User avatar
ksen
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by ksen » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:01 pm

Oblivion said in a recent game when talk of scum safe-claims came up that she likes to reserve a big name or two for scum to use safely.

User avatar
amok
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:23 am
About me: Bearer of bad news.
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by amok » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:02 pm

Whatever we decide, the best option is to include making a kill choice today that's dependent on the flip of the lynch choice, as well as the lynch choice. Please.

The Mason claim sounds reasonable. I already posted my role from Oblivion on Day 3, and it was the real role that was more elaborate and the safe-claim that was basic.

Edited slightly to not break the rules:
I am Colonel Robert Makepeace and I am on no one's side but my own, and that of whoever will best butter my bread. I am the serial killer. I win by surviving until another faction wins.

If I need a safe name claim I can use General George Hammond
I can't even find a General George Hammond on any of the Stargate sites. I think it's just a made up name.
It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important.
- Martin Luther King Jr.

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by Zigmen » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:11 pm

ksen wrote:Oblivion said in a recent game when talk of scum safe-claims came up that she likes to reserve a big name or two for scum to use safely.
Yeah, but both as big as ours?
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by Zigmen » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:12 pm

Athene wrote:
Zigmen wrote:I think we should mass character claim.

Objections?
none
And your claim is?
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
amok
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:23 am
About me: Bearer of bad news.
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by amok » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:19 pm

Athene, truly understand doubts about my win condition.

I didn't kill on Night 1 or Night 3 on purpose. I didn't kill on Night 2 because Bilirubin was protected. I mentioned before that a Serial Killer who doesn't kill is a feeble threat. Last-standing would require me to kill as much as possible, no?
It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important.
- Martin Luther King Jr.

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by Zigmen » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:24 pm

Short easy day for me. I'm headed home now and will check in regularly.

In the meantime, diva, here's a checklist for you.

[] I think Oblivion gave scum two of the most important characters as safe claims.
[] I think these two claims would be obviously fitted for mason roles.
[] I think voting for uncontested outed Town Specials is normal and wise.

I don't point this out to take a jab at you, but merely to point out what everyone else (mostly) already sees.

The most uncleared players we have are Athene, Charlou, and Higgs. The list would be much longer if Feck didn't take out Praying. I agree she needed to go.

We think there are 2 Scum.

We can win this.

Just need you to play. Ask questions, look at what's going on.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Stargate SG1 - Day 5

Post by Zigmen » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:26 pm

amok wrote:Athene, truly understand doubts about my win condition.

I didn't kill on Night 1 or Night 3 on purpose. I didn't kill on Night 2 because Bilirubin was protected. I mentioned before that a Serial Killer who doesn't kill is a feeble threat. Last-standing would require me to kill as much as possible, no?
It's irrelvant and she knows it.

If we kill 2 more Scum and the game is still going, you get lynched. That was the deal.

If we can't kill 2 more Scum, we lose fucking anyway.

I don't know why she's playing daft as a log.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests