Does evolution make electrons go at their absolutely perfect speed?
Perfect speed? What would that be then, and what does it have to do with evolution? Are you making the classic cretinist mistake of confusing physics with biology?
Molecular scientists say only one-millionth of an atom
consists of matter, and all the rest is empty space!
Kaaaayyyyyy...
At the center of an atom is a positively-charged nucleus.
At a great distance from the nucleus is one or more negatively-charged electrons.
Electrons circle around the nucleus at an incredible speed.
Errr, no. Firstly, electrons don't 'go around the nucleus', they exist in a kind of cloud of probability, as described by the Schrödinger equation.
The Force-A of attraction between the electron (-) and nucleus (+)
must be exactly equal to the Force-B velocity of the moving electron
in order for it to maintain its’ perfect circular pattern.
Well, apart from the fact that velocity is not a force, velocity is also a vector quantity, while speed is a scalar quantity, so does the electron have velocity or does it have speed?
IF the electron was to slow down, Force-A would be greater than Force-B
… causing the electron to collapse into the nucleus.
IF the electron was to speed up, Force-B would be greater than Force-A
… causing the electron to just fly off into space.
IF either of these two scenarios were to happen
… the atom would disintegrate (disappear), leaving basically nothing at all.
Ah, I see you haven't been introduced to the concept of electronic transition, in which electrons jump from one orbit to another based on the energy they embody. If you had, you'd understand that this argument doesn't remotely stand up to scrutiny.
Well, one-millionth of our world would still be floating around in space.
One millionth? I put it to you, you ignoramus, that one million millionths of our world are still floating around in space (with due reference to the fact that travelling at some 30 metres per second can hardly be described as 'floating').
Does evolution make electrons go at their absolutely perfect speed?
Which perfect speed would that be? See previous point about electronic transition.
The Bible says, “No”, and explains what controls the speed of electrons.
Ah, I see the source of your fuckwittery. The babble isn't a science book. Perhaps a little education would serve you here.
God SPOKE everything into existence (Genesis 1: 3, 6, 9, 11, etc.).
His spoken word is incredibly powerful.
“He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood,
and His name is called The Word of God.” (Revelation 19:13)
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God.
All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made
that was made. … He was in the world, and the world was made through Him
… And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us …” (John 1:1-14)
The underlined refers to God the Son (Jesus); the other Person is God the Father.
“He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn* over all creation.
For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth,
visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers.
All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things,
and in Him all things (now) consist (hold together).” (Colossians 1:15-17)
* first to be resurrected from the dead (see verse 18)
“God … has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has
appointed heir of all things, through whom He also made the worlds;
who being the brightness of His glory and the express image of His person,
and upholding* all things by the word of His power …” (Hebrews 1:1-3)
The terms “Son of God” and “God the Son” are names (titles) only.
The “last days” of 2000 years, compared to the first 4000 years of Jewish history.
* bearing or carrying, referring to movement and progress toward a final end.
God’s Son not only created the universe, but also maintains and directs its’ course.
The laws of nature are His laws, and they operate at His command.
Perhaps it's just my stupidity, but I'm not seeing where it mentions the orbits of electrons, or what any of your argument has to do with evolution. Help us out here. Is this another of those 'contextual' things, in which you have to make up what is meant?
