The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:17 pm

Oh, do I get to denounce CES? He's a bit, you know, right-wing.......
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:18 pm

Jaygray wrote:‘Atheism Plus’ sounds like an advertisement for new improved washing powder, and I would take any claims to its efficacy with the same truckload of salt I would use for any other piece of demographic marketing. I bet the name will fit on a T shirt wonderfully.

I would look twice at any idea with an FtB badge on it anyway, because as far as I am concerned they are totally discredited. Generalisation? Yep. :smug:

Also, if whoever has come up with this imagines that a doctrinaire approach to Atheism is anything other than abject silliness, then we are not exactly dealing with intellectual heavyweights.

However if they want their own train set to play with they’re welcome; it makes zero difference to me. :coffee:
What bothers me the most is that I have to go back to Seth and admit that he was right. There really is a subset of atheists called "Atheists" (albeit, now, they are dubbing themselves "Atheist Plus").... and they really are as dickish as Seth made them out to be. And, there are enough of them, and they are vocal enough, to embarrass us all.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:19 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:Oh, do I get to denounce CES? He's a bit, you know, right-wing.......
I'm all out of nounce.

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:20 pm

I intend to combat the movement through the medium of twee ceramic jewellery.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6326
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Tyrannical » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:21 pm

Atheism has long been infiltrated by hoards of fakes who claim atheism because they "disagree" with certain religious tenets, yet they also believe in a concept of equality that could only be true under creationism.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Jaygray
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 1:00 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Jaygray » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:26 pm

Tyrannical wrote:Atheism has long been infiltrated by hoards of fakes who claim atheism because they "disagree" with certain religious tenets, yet they also believe in a concept of equality that could only be true under creationism.
Well put! :clap:

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:26 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:I intend to combat the movement through the medium of twee ceramic jewellery.
What????

Only Surly Amy is allowed to sell ceramic jewelry. If you try to sell your "fake" ceramic jewelry, you will have your nounce removed, with extreme prejudice.

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:28 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:I intend to combat the movement through the medium of twee ceramic jewellery.
What????

Only Surly Amy is allowed to sell ceramic jewelry. If you try to sell your "fake" ceramic jewelry, you will have your nounce removed, with extreme prejudice.
I'm going to make a necklace that encapsulates all that.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:36 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Clinton Huxley wrote:I intend to combat the movement through the medium of twee ceramic jewellery.
What????

Only Surly Amy is allowed to sell ceramic jewelry. If you try to sell your "fake" ceramic jewelry, you will have your nounce removed, with extreme prejudice.
I'm going to make a necklace that encapsulates all that.
If you refuse to denounce someone, does that automatically make you pronounce?

User avatar
Trinity
Posts: 6362
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 6:30 pm
About me: I'm growing a new me!!
Location: east of south west
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Trinity » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:44 pm

And who, pray is trounced?
Here's to Now.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:46 pm

Trinity wrote:And who, pray is trounced?
Oh, Mr. Trounced was announced. Didn't you hear?

User avatar
Trinity
Posts: 6362
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 6:30 pm
About me: I'm growing a new me!!
Location: east of south west
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Trinity » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:48 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Trinity wrote:And who, pray is trounced?
Oh, Mr. Trounced was announced. Didn't you hear?
But I thought he was jounced!
Here's to Now.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39234
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Animavore » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:50 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Jaygray wrote:‘Atheism Plus’ sounds like an advertisement for new improved washing powder, and I would take any claims to its efficacy with the same truckload of salt I would use for any other piece of demographic marketing. I bet the name will fit on a T shirt wonderfully.

I would look twice at any idea with an FtB badge on it anyway, because as far as I am concerned they are totally discredited. Generalisation? Yep. :smug:

Also, if whoever has come up with this imagines that a doctrinaire approach to Atheism is anything other than abject silliness, then we are not exactly dealing with intellectual heavyweights.

However if they want their own train set to play with they’re welcome; it makes zero difference to me. :coffee:
What bothers me the most is that I have to go back to Seth and admit that he was right. There really is a subset of atheists called "Atheists" (albeit, now, they are dubbing themselves "Atheist Plus").... and they really are as dickish as Seth made them out to be. And, there are enough of them, and they are vocal enough, to embarrass us all.
Is there really that many of them? Doesn't seem like something that'll get off the ground to me.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Audley Strange » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:51 pm

Describing the latest hilarity to the good Lady Strange she quipped, "it's like an episode of Community."
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:00 pm

Trinity wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Trinity wrote:And who, pray is trounced?
Oh, Mr. Trounced was announced. Didn't you hear?
But I thought he was jounced!
That won't get you a mounce of sympathy from me...

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests