A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
Pensioner
Grumpy old fart.
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:22 am
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Pensioner » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:58 pm

Double post.
“I wish no harm to any human being, but I, as one man, am going to exercise my freedom of speech. No human being on the face of the earth, no government is going to take from me my right to speak, my right to protest against wrong, my right to do everything that is for the benefit of mankind. I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.”

John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.

Pensioner
Grumpy old fart.
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:22 am
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Pensioner » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:59 pm

.
“I wish no harm to any human being, but I, as one man, am going to exercise my freedom of speech. No human being on the face of the earth, no government is going to take from me my right to speak, my right to protest against wrong, my right to do everything that is for the benefit of mankind. I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.”

John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.

User avatar
Gawd
Posts: 2140
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:03 pm
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Gawd » Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:22 pm

Rum wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:
Rum wrote:
lordpasternack wrote:I am rather let down by Pappa's outburst. A lot of us are. We also suspect that he was likely rather drunk at the time, can't speak now because he's suspended, and will likely say something when he returns, sober and better balanced.

As I already stated, I'm not personally involved in any dispute here, regret that members have voluntarily left, and want nothing to do with the acrimony.
I'm with LP. And I am glad to see this is fizzling out (I hope) at last. I have just skim read the last 39 pages to make sure I understood what this was all about..and I am astonished that I - and the rest of us have expended so much energy on it.

I can only conclude what we already know - dramaz is fun but potentially very destructive. :sighsm:
If it were your drama Rum, you might feel differently.

Drama is potentially very destructive, but it can also be instructive, and constructive.
Well my précis is as follows:-

1. Peeps from RS come over here and complain about modding arrangments, style and 'strictness'. Shame they can't do so over there, but there ya go.
2. Some other RS members arrive and disagree.
3. Members who spend more time here than there but have a foot in both camps argue about the modding over there.
4. Members from here who don't know anything about RS throw a few random argumentative comments in.
5. Their 'deputy senior mod' (ffs sake what is that supposed to be!?) comes over and argues their case.
6. Our mods and their mod have a shit throwing competition about the best modding and rules and crap.
7. A number of people throw their dummies out of their prams.
8. People pull their thumbs out of their arses wonder what the next drama fun thing will be about.
And I didn't even throw in Israel yet.

User avatar
Don't Panic
Evil Admin
Evil Admin
Posts: 10653
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 am
About me: 100% Pure Evil. (Not from Concentrate)
Location: Luimneach, Eire
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Don't Panic » Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:37 pm

Fallible wrote: Amagad, amagad! Teh eebil RatSkep modz!!1 Warnings have been rescinded when it has been agreed that a mistake had been made. Some time ago, one of our mods suffered a momentary lapse and requested someone go forth and multiply. Not that it was a patch on your own Pappa's little shit-squirt there, but nevertheless in double quick time, the moderator in question issued a public apology. Not something I've seen happen here yet, by the way. But then I guess he would have to admit he made a mistake to do that. A couple of months back, I accidentally clicked 'edit' rather than 'quote' when I replied to a member's post and managed to delete half of it. That was the only thing I ever deleted, and that was an accident. Guess what? I typed a big red public apology.

Any more little factoids picked up because someone with a cob on typed some stuff on teh interwebz which you would like addressed with facts, or will that be all?

Oh and LaMont, I know why you were banned from RatSkep. Yes...

The Fallible knows...
Pappa has been suspended for 24 hours for his little outburst. Why not wait until he's capable of posting before you jump to a conclusion.
Gawd wrote:»
And those Zumwalts are already useless, they can be taken out with an ICBM.
The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome. I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And . . . the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.
D.N.A.

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Lozzer » Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:52 pm

Don't Panic wrote:
Fallible wrote: Amagad, amagad! Teh eebil RatSkep modz!!1 Warnings have been rescinded when it has been agreed that a mistake had been made. Some time ago, one of our mods suffered a momentary lapse and requested someone go forth and multiply. Not that it was a patch on your own Pappa's little shit-squirt there, but nevertheless in double quick time, the moderator in question issued a public apology. Not something I've seen happen here yet, by the way. But then I guess he would have to admit he made a mistake to do that. A couple of months back, I accidentally clicked 'edit' rather than 'quote' when I replied to a member's post and managed to delete half of it. That was the only thing I ever deleted, and that was an accident. Guess what? I typed a big red public apology.

Any more little factoids picked up because someone with a cob on typed some stuff on teh interwebz which you would like addressed with facts, or will that be all?

Oh and LaMont, I know why you were banned from RatSkep. Yes...

The Fallible knows...
Pappa has been suspended for 24 hours for his little outburst. Why not wait until he's capable of posting before you jump to a conclusion.
What was his outburst?
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

User avatar
Posse Comitatus
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:45 pm
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Posse Comitatus » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:16 pm

Tigger wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:
Robert_S wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:It's a pity that everyone - Starr, Mazille and Theses95 asked, or are asking to have their accounts suspended. I'm as frustrated as the next person with how this discussion has been going - but open dialogue can't happen when you shut down, whether it's having your account suspended or locking a thread. :dono:

I want to apologize for any part I may have had in driving you all away - Starr, I hope you are reading this because I am sincere when I say this. I'm very sorry if your feelings and sensibilities have been hurt or if you have felt attacked in any way, it was not my intention.

I wonder if it's possible for everyone to just take a break from this thread and let things calm down a bit? You are all valued members of our community - please don't go. :cry:
Did you see what Posse did to the "Yes it is, No it isn't" section?

I put myself in the group that can't see it after that.
who's POsse? :ask: :ask:
Posse Comitatus http://rationalia.com/forum/memberlist. ... file&u=190
I've not been following this thread but why is this being discussed here?


Also IT WAS A PRINCIPLED STAND. A bit.

User avatar
leo-rcc
Robo-Warrior
Posts: 7848
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:09 pm
About me: Combat robot builder
Location: Hoogvliet-Rotterdam, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by leo-rcc » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:18 pm

Posse Comitatus wrote:I've not been following this thread but why is this being discussed here?
I have no idea.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org

Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Tigger » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:19 pm

Posse Comitatus wrote:
Tigger wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:
Robert_S wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:It's a pity that everyone - Starr, Mazille and Theses95 asked, or are asking to have their accounts suspended. I'm as frustrated as the next person with how this discussion has been going - but open dialogue can't happen when you shut down, whether it's having your account suspended or locking a thread. :dono:

I want to apologize for any part I may have had in driving you all away - Starr, I hope you are reading this because I am sincere when I say this. I'm very sorry if your feelings and sensibilities have been hurt or if you have felt attacked in any way, it was not my intention.

I wonder if it's possible for everyone to just take a break from this thread and let things calm down a bit? You are all valued members of our community - please don't go. :cry:
Did you see what Posse did to the "Yes it is, No it isn't" section?

I put myself in the group that can't see it after that.
who's POsse? :ask: :ask:


Posse Comitatus http://rationalia.com/forum/memberlist. ... file&u=190
I've not been following this thread but why is this being discussed here?


Also IT WAS A PRINCIPLED STAND. A bit.
Who can fucking say? I wouldn't worry about it at all. :biggrin:
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

User avatar
Posse Comitatus
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:45 pm
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Posse Comitatus » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:20 pm

GAWD I'M REALLY SORRY IF I HURT YOUR FEELINGS :(



On another note was it actually a big deal? I think I may have completely misjudged the situation and possibly tone of the subforum.

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Tigger » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:24 pm

Posse Comitatus wrote:GAWD I'M REALLY SORRY IF I HURT YOUR FEELINGS :(



On another note was it actually a big deal? I think I may have completely misjudged the situation and possibly tone of the subforum.
Your last sentence? I don't think so, actually. The tone there is exactly as it comes across, and some people react robustly to it.
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

LaMont Cranston
Posts: 872
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:58 pm
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by LaMont Cranston » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:26 pm

Rum, I think that you sumned up things nicely.

LaMont Cranston
Posts: 872
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:58 pm
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by LaMont Cranston » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:29 pm

maiforpeace, I've got to agree with you about that "night before" ritual before they give you the drugs. I mean, putting away a fucking gallon of laxative, one glass every ten minutes until it's gone, is quite the challenge. I guess that doctors don't want to put up with that shit, but, at least, they do give you the drugs.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Robert_S » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:41 pm

LaMont Cranston wrote:Rum, I think that you sumned up things nicely.
You forgot the illustration though.

Image
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
virphen
Posts: 1451
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:37 am
About me: "that fairy-fingering ass-raping space lizard"

One year own my home planet = 3 on earth.
Location: Orbit.

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by virphen » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:47 pm

I haven't been here for a long time, because of the troll-home this place has become, but after what I have seen in this thread I'd like my account suspended too, please.

User avatar
Posse Comitatus
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:45 pm
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Posse Comitatus » Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:48 pm

why are people getting their accounts suspended? I DONT UNDERSTAND

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest