Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

[Strontium Dog]

Demonstrating the acumen that has seen you repeatedly banned from the forum, I see.

[DaveDodo007]

Typical, while S D is fighting against lard arse bigotry at ratskep you all think being (physically) thick is a joke.

Remember, everything is a joke in the happy land of Rationalia...

(except gin, of course...)

95% of anything I post on the Internet is a joke. Or should that last statement by me be misconstrued by nefarious naysayers, is an attempt at humour. I simply don't take life seriously and anybody that does needs their ration of gin taken away.

[DaveDodo007]

Just read your thread over there. Seriously, you are an affront to brain cells. The only reason you haven't been banned for being a troll over there is that no one can work out whether you are a troll or more simply just incredibly stupid. I honestly can't tell. My suspicion is that no one who posts on a rationalist site for this long can be as stupid as that.

You have been reading the feedback forum.

[Scott1328]

rEv always seems to have a sock going, and then he posts and gets banned.

[pErvinalia]

I'm innocent of all charges and scurrilous accusations.

[DaveDodo007]

I'm innocent of all charges and scurrilous accusations.

That's what Jimmy Savile said at my last seance meeting.

[Doubtdispelled]

Typical, while S D is fighting against lard arse bigotry at ratskep you all think being (physically) thick is a joke.

Remember, everything is a joke in the happy land of Rationalia...

(except gin, of course...)

95% of anything I post on the Internet is a joke. Or should that last statement by me be misconstrued by nefarious naysayers, is an attempt at humour.

I'm glad you said 'attempt'. But you forgot to add the origin of the other 5%, i.e. that it's plagiarised.

[DaveDodo007]

Typical, while S D is fighting against lard arse bigotry at ratskep you all think being (physically) thick is a joke.

Remember, everything is a joke in the happy land of Rationalia...

(except gin, of course...)

95% of anything I post on the Internet is a joke. Or should that last statement by me be misconstrued by nefarious naysayers, is an attempt at humour.

I'm glad you said 'attempt'. But you forgot to add the origin of the other 5%, i.e. that it's plagiarised.

Lolwut? And elaborate.

[DaveDodo007]

I don't even agree on Strontium Dog's stance via the lard arses, I could give biological/medical reasons for my stance if I cared enough about the issue, I don't. Though all I have seen here is ad hominems against S D himself which now seems part of the course in rational/skeptic debates because feelz iz realz. Some people need to up their game here and it isn't S D.

[pErvinalia]

yeah, but he's a cock.

[Doubtdispelled]

Typical, while S D is fighting against lard arse bigotry at ratskep you all think being (physically) thick is a joke.

Remember, everything is a joke in the happy land of Rationalia...

(except gin, of course...)

95% of anything I post on the Internet is a joke. Or should that last statement by me be misconstrued by nefarious naysayers, is an attempt at humour.

I'm glad you said 'attempt'. But you forgot to add the origin of the other 5%, i.e. that it's plagiarised.

Lolwut? And elaborate.

You know what I'm talking about, Dave. The main bulk of this post has been lifted directly from a screed which is being copied and pasted all over facebook on pages like idon'tneedfeminismbecause, and WomenAgainstFeminism, and probably lots of other places too.

But you presented it as though it was your own work, how pathetic can you get?

If you try to claim that you are in fact the originator, it'll be the best laugh I've had in ages.

[DaveDodo007]

You know what I'm talking about, Dave. The main bulk of this post has been lifted directly from a screed which is being copied and pasted all over facebook on pages like idon'tneedfeminismbecause, and WomenAgainstFeminism, and probably lots of other places too.

But you presented it as though it was your own work, how pathetic can you get?

If you try to claim that you are in fact the originator, it'll be the best laugh I've had in ages.

I never claimed it was my work and I had permission to use it, the author actually wanted it spread around as much as possible. It's not like I haven't made the argument before using my own words when proudfootz give a list of feminism's achievements, this one was just more eloquent and give links. Plus one post equals 5%.

[Doubtdispelled]

I never claimed it was my work

You presented it as though it was. And strangely, for some reason, that leads people to assume that it is.

and I had permission to use it, the author actually wanted it spread around as much as possible.

And you gave no hint whatsoever that this was the case. I don't know about here, haven't read the full fua, but where you presented this work as your own i.e. on Ratskep, by not attributing it to anyone else, or even attempting to alert readers to the fact that this was not your own work, you broke several of the rules of that website. And you showed yourself to be utterly intellectually dishonest.

It's not like I haven't made the argument before using my own words when proudfootz give a list of feminism's achievements,

And been slapped down every time...

this one was just more eloquent

Indeed it was. That's what alerted me to the little factoid that you couldn't possibly have written it.

Plus one post equals 5%.

Oh, ok then, let's call it 1%. That leaves 4% for sheer trolling bollocks, and the other 90% for attempts at 'humour'.

[DaveDodo007]

I never claimed it was my work

You presented it as though it was. And strangely, for some reason, that leads people to assume that it is.

and I had permission to use it, the author actually wanted it spread around as much as possible.

And you gave no hint whatsoever that this was the case. I don't know about here, haven't read the full fua, but where you presented this work as your own i.e. on Ratskep, by not attributing it to anyone else, or even attempting to alert readers to the fact that this was not your own work, you broke several of the rules of that website. And you showed yourself to be utterly intellectually dishonest.

It's not like I haven't made the argument before using my own words when proudfootz give a list of feminism's achievements,

And been slapped down every time...

this one was just more eloquent

Indeed it was. That's what alerted me to the little factoid that you couldn't possibly have written it.

Plus one post equals 5%.

Oh, ok then, let's call it 1%. That leaves 4% for sheer trolling bollocks, and the other 90% for attempts at 'humour'.

Lol, I can tell now that you were never part of the new atheist vanguard that posted in the main stream media comment sections from 2007 onwards, or the tactics we had to use considering we were outnumbered sometimes one hundred to one. Well you know what, the MRM has to use the same tactics what with there being so few of us an all.

I'll let you into a little secret, Just like the new atheist movement in the early days the manosphere has places were we discuss tactics. Just like the new atheists we have our own forums and know were to meet online. There we ask questions like 'have you heard this argument', 'were did the 1 in for 4 statistics come from as there is no link in this article.' 'Need a little help here (links to facebook/reddit/other/online discussion)', and my favourite 'use this if such and such an argument is posted.' How do you think MRAs can argue with ten different commentators at the same time in the comment sections? Are they all knowing and speed typists, yeah right! We are a small group who have each others backs and try to help each other in any way we can, there is no place for egotist as the cause is all. Probably my posts on why gender isn't a social construct are being used as I post this, I certainly hope so.

[DaveDodo007]

Fuck me, there are some serious retards over at ratskep. They really need an IQ test before they allow people to join that forum, I have had harder challenges letting the cat chase the red dot.