To do that, you have to believe you're owed something by a website you need have paid nothing to join.Babel wrote:You have to love the communication skills over at ratskep.
DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
- Surendra Darathy
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
- About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
- Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!
- Fallible
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
- About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
- Location: Scouseland
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
Reading between the lines, "review of probationary membership" says to me "discussing if he gets to stay a member". As to what prompted it, I can only assume it was his interactions with The_Metatron and Cito, or a combination of that with him starting a second feedback thread on the same topic when the first one was locked with a number of users still unclear on what the mod position was. Or they've just pegged him as a troll and this "review" is not directly relevant to anything he did immediately before the suspension - there is precedent for those viewed as trolls being banned without a specific incident being the culprit, but the posting pattern of the individual. But as you say, it could be made a lot clearer.Babel wrote:Yeah, I saw that in the temp suspension thread, but it tells us nothing. So I was more interested in what situation led to Samsa's temp suspension. But his reply is equally informative. You have to love the communication skills over at ratskep.Fallible wrote:For "review of probationary membership". Um...OK then...Babel wrote:Samsa: what were you suspended for this time?
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

- pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 60702
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
Too plain, I think. You only comment here when your fee fees are getting hurt. You are trying to win back your honour from us scandalous jizz-mongers who would deign to point out that you post salad in place of erudite commentary.Surendra Darathy wrote:I'm a member of this site, rEv. Is that plain enough for ya?rEvolutionist wrote:So what are you doing here then?
I see you still can't use the quote function properly. Too many glasses of cooking sherry tonight, perhaps?I see you have a long list of authors upon whose style you condescend to comment. There's just no pleasing some people, they of such elevated sensibilities.rEvolutionist wrote:Babel wrote:The only man who can write 5 paragraphs and essentially say nothing.

Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
- Fallible
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
- About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
- Location: Scouseland
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
Only if you're of such limited intellectual capacity that you can only countenance a single reason for one holding such an opinion.Surendra Darathy wrote:To do that, you have to believe you're owed something by a website you need have paid nothing to join.Babel wrote:You have to love the communication skills over at ratskep.
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

- Surendra Darathy
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
- About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
- Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
What make you suppose that it's night-time in my part of the world, honey? Too many glasses of cooking sherry? Or just the same old simple provincialism I've seen from you time and again?rEvolutionist wrote:Too many glasses of cooking sherry tonight, perhaps?
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
Yeah it's all pretty weird. The only thing I could think of was either the debatable "revealing of PM contents" in the feedback thread (which I fixed within minutes), or the "inflammatory posting" in the ADHD thread where I suggested that Metatron supported an anti-science position because of his lack of knowledge of how science works, or potentially "misrepresentation" as I described his Big Pharma theory of drugging children as the "aliens theory".Babel wrote:Yeah, I saw that in the temp suspension thread, but it tells us nothing. So I was more interested in what situation led to Samsa's temp suspension. But his reply is equally informative. You have to love the communication skills over at ratskep.Fallible wrote:For "review of probationary membership". Um...OK then...Babel wrote:Samsa: what were you suspended for this time?
If they think I've broken the rules then I don't see what the issue is with just giving me a warning (and thus month suspension due to my 'probationary status' - though I hope the last 48hrs is deducted from it otherwise that's pretty shitty). If they think they have a case that I'm a "troll", which is fucking ridiculous, then there's no point in suspending me for 48hrs or referring to my probationary status, as a troll is a troll regardless of whether they're on probation or not.
They'll have an extremely hard time demonstrating that I'm a "troll" though (if that's what they're trying to do), given that by far my contribution to the forum consists of constructive posts and I even dedicate a lot of my time to the feedback section trying to improve the functioning of the site. They also need near-unanimous agreement for the decision to go ahead and I don't think all of the mods would be petty enough to twist the rules to suit their personal desires.
So who knows what the fuck is going on.
“The real question is not whether machines think but whether men do. The mystery which surrounds a thinking machine already surrounds a thinking man.” - B. F. Skinner.
- Fallible
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
- About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
- Location: Scouseland
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
How did provincialism make you fuck up the quote function?Surendra Darathy wrote:What make you suppose that it's night-time in my part of the world, honey? Too many glasses of cooking sherry? Or just the same old simple provincialism I've seen from you time and again?rEvolutionist wrote:Too many glasses of cooking sherry tonight, perhaps?
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

- Surendra Darathy
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
- About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
- Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
Do you really think that a reference to someone's 'probationary membership' does not include considering all the reasons why that membership is probationary in the first place. Of course, you can assume your conclusion, namely, that every charge against poor ol' Samsa is trumped up nonsense, regardless of what lies there staring back at you from the pages of that forum. The question of what to do about emotionally-volatile members who persist in attacking people instead of ideas is not an easy one. Whatever else you can say about me, Fall, 'emotionally volatile' is not one of them.Fallible wrote:Reading between the lines, "review of probationary membership" says to me "discussing if he gets to stay a member". As to what prompted it, I can only assume it was his interactions with The_Metatron and Cito, or a combination of that with him starting a second feedback thread on the same topic when the first one was locked with a number of users still unclear on what the mod position was. Or they've just pegged him as a troll and this "review" is not directly relevant to anything he did immediately before the suspension - there is precedent for those viewed as trolls being banned without a specific incident being the culprit, but the posting pattern of the individual. But as you say, it could be made a lot clearer.Babel wrote:Yeah, I saw that in the temp suspension thread, but it tells us nothing. So I was more interested in what situation led to Samsa's temp suspension. But his reply is equally informative. You have to love the communication skills over at ratskep.Fallible wrote:For "review of probationary membership". Um...OK then...Babel wrote:Samsa: what were you suspended for this time?
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
I think you're clutching at straws if you're trying to label me as "emotionally volatile".. Unless having laughing fits at your incoherent nonsense is "emotionally volatile", and then yeah, sure.Surendra Darathy wrote:The question of what to do about emotionally-volatile members who persist in attacking people instead of ideas is not an easy one. Whatever else you can say about me, Fall, 'emotionally volatile' is not one of them.
“The real question is not whether machines think but whether men do. The mystery which surrounds a thinking machine already surrounds a thinking man.” - B. F. Skinner.
- Surendra Darathy
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:45 pm
- About me: I am only human. Keep in mind, I am Russian. And is no part of speech in Russian equivalent to definite article in English. Bad enough is no present tense of verb "to be".
- Location: Rugburn-on-Knees, Kent, UK
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
That's part of it, of course, Samsa. But I see you're not denying the bits about attacking people instead of ideas. QED. Should you survive your judicial review, I hope you'll take that forward in interacting with me over there. The more personal attacks you make, the better. Sooner or later, it will add up.Mr.Samsa wrote:I think you're clutching at straws if you're trying to label me as "emotionally volatile".. Unless having laughing fits at your incoherent nonsense is "emotionally volatile", and then yeah, sure.Surendra Darathy wrote:The question of what to do about emotionally-volatile members who persist in attacking people instead of ideas is not an easy one. Whatever else you can say about me, Fall, 'emotionally volatile' is not one of them.
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little God, too!
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
I did address that - I referred to your ideas as nonsense. The idea that I attack people instead of ideas on ratskep is absurd and you can't find any evidence to support you there.Surendra Darathy wrote:That's part of it, of course, Samsa. But I see you're not denying the bits about attacking people instead of ideas. QED. Should you survive your judicial review, I hope you'll take that forward in interacting with me over there. The more personal attacks you make, the better. Sooner or later, it will add up.
As for "interacting with you in the future", do you really think your trolling should be tolerated and your bullshit not called out? You know I was interested in how many times you used the words "spoon" and "bend" in your posts, and you had done it over 300 times. That's like once every 3-4 days. And you think you're not a troll and that you're somebody who deserves to be spoken to like a real boy? Jesus christ.
“The real question is not whether machines think but whether men do. The mystery which surrounds a thinking machine already surrounds a thinking man.” - B. F. Skinner.
- pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 60702
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
It's always night somewhere in the world, Surrender. You should stick to wibble. Attempting rational argumentation doesn't suit you...Surendra Darathy wrote:What make you suppose that it's night-time in my part of the world, honey? Too many glasses of cooking sherry? Or just the same old simple provincialism I've seen from you time and again?rEvolutionist wrote:Too many glasses of cooking sherry tonight, perhaps?
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
Ratskep has a classification called temp suspension? Are the the people who came up with this tautology unaware that suspensions are temporary by definition, or is their objective to raise the rules to ever greater heights of Byzantine complexity and Kafkaesque absurdity?Babel wrote:I saw that in the temp suspension thread
Oh, and hello Cito. I was hoping not to get reacquainted with your tortuously expressed verbosity signifying nothing since I had the misfortune to encounter some of them at, I think it was TR, but since you have decided to spread your public wanking to this forum once again, enjoy yourself. No harm done. Your jizz will dry up soon enough, and people will step over it without fearing the soles of their shoes will spread it all over the place.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
-
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:37 pm
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
Surendra Darathy wrote:If one examines the reasons why a membership is probationary one is faced with a choice: either accept subcultural discourse or conclude that probation serves to marginalize the Other. The capitalist paradigm of consensus holds that the collective is intrinsically unattainable, but only if the premise of cultural postmaterial theory is invalid; otherwise, we can assume that reality is a product of the masses. It could be said that an abundance of probationary sublimations concerning the common ground between reality and class exist.Fallible wrote:Reading between the lines, "review of probationary membership" says to me "discussing if he gets to stay a member". As to what prompted it, I can only assume it was his interactions with The_Metatron and Cito, or a combination of that with him starting a second feedback thread on the same topic when the first one was locked with a number of users still unclear on what the mod position was. Or they've just pegged him as a troll and this "review" is not directly relevant to anything he did immediately before the suspension - there is precedent for those viewed as trolls being banned without a specific incident being the culprit, but the posting pattern of the individual. But as you say, it could be made a lot clearer.Babel wrote:Yeah, I saw that in the temp suspension thread, but it tells us nothing. So I was more interested in what situation led to Samsa's temp suspension. But his reply is equally informative. You have to love the communication skills over at ratskep.Fallible wrote:For "review of probationary membership". Um...OK then...Babel wrote:Samsa: what were you suspended for this time?
All rights have to be voted on. That's how they become rights.
- pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 60702
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.
Seriously, heal thyself, wibblician! Your posts are almost always directed at the person, not at the content. This is easy to determine, as your standard MO is to ignore the crux of a post and pick an inconsequential part of the post and use it in an attempt to make the poster look stupid. Seriously, you'd have to be an even bigger nong than you already are if you think most people can't see through your trolling. Presumably the mods are in awe of your shiny baubles, but given their competence, that's not something to be too proud of.Surendra Darathy wrote:That's part of it, of course, Samsa. But I see you're not denying the bits about attacking people instead of ideas. QED. Should you survive your judicial review, I hope you'll take that forward in interacting with me over there. The more personal attacks you make, the better. Sooner or later, it will add up.Mr.Samsa wrote:I think you're clutching at straws if you're trying to label me as "emotionally volatile".. Unless having laughing fits at your incoherent nonsense is "emotionally volatile", and then yeah, sure.Surendra Darathy wrote:The question of what to do about emotionally-volatile members who persist in attacking people instead of ideas is not an easy one. Whatever else you can say about me, Fall, 'emotionally volatile' is not one of them.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests