Why creationists can laugh at atheist feminists?

[DaveDodo007]

You have not caught me in a gotcha moment

Once again as you seem to be a bit hard of hearing : you claim to believe in absolute free speech while at the same time getting all het
up over the fact that some whose opinions you do not share are actually exercising it. Hermit and rEv and myself have pointed it out to
you. But instead of admitting to it you get out your shovel and start digging away as fast as you can. Now I am disappointed in you Dave
I expected better from someone with a degree who can speak three languages. Much better. So maybe you could try to make the effort

OK then show me how I am suppose to shine a light on the hypocrisy in the media without my own values being used against me. Surely context matters?

[DaveDodo007]

Well Dave can review what we've written. We've told him before, but like Seth, he accuses us of lying.

As far as I know I haven't accused you of lying, I have accused you of not being skeptical when you own ideology is being critiqued.

[DaveDodo007]

...

I am but if we have (stupid) laws why I'm I wrong to expect them to be applied consistently. I'm a member of quite a few free speech organizations in the UK but we are losing battle after battle. Free speech is dead in the UK.

Perhaps your augments are i) too selective and/or narrowly focused, or ii) shit.

Then you should be able to debunk them rather than some general dismissal.

[DaveDodo007]

Dave : please do not start debating like Strontium Dog and twisting every thing out of context
Have some balls and stand by what you say for then at least you will be honest if nothing else

This is bullshit, this thread is about so called skeptics not being skeptical about their own sacred cow. You have not caught me in a gotcha moment. In this context I am pointing out the double standards of the main stream media and I have every right to point it out. None of this is relevant to my own personal values which is divorced from the argument I am making. You and most of the other posters are just getting desperate now otherwise you would be posting all the evidence that shows how wrong I am. I mean if I'm wrong show me all the evidence of feminism just fighting for equal rights, it shouldn't be that hard since you keep claiming that it is true.

(We need a flying pig smilie.)

I'm a feminist and I fight for equal rights. You can read my comments here and at the two other forums. There's a number of other feminists here and at the other place who think similar. There's your evidence. Now shut the fuck up!

I guess what Dave might ask is to what extent do you criticise the extreme positions he sooks about (which are a part of the feminist movement, if not the dominant strand as he insists they are); the stuff like women must always speak first at conferences, or that no conference should even go ahead without at least 50% of the speakers being female.

Don't expect an answer even from a friendly source like yourself, the narrative must be maintained at all cost.

[pErvinalia]

I've answered this already. See how much this forum rubbished A+ and Rebecca Watson. Do your research before spouting off bullshit.

[DaveDodo007]

I've answered this already. See how much this forum rubbished A+ and Rebecca Watson. Do your research before spouting off bullshit.

How are you any better when you subscribe to pomo shit feelz over realz.

[DaveDodo007]

Feminist science.

[pErvinalia]

I've answered this already. See how much this forum rubbished A+ and Rebecca Watson. Do your research before spouting off bullshit.

How are you any better when you subscribe to pomo shit feelz over realz.

Huh?!? In English?

[DaveDodo007]

More feminist science.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1076200/posts

[pErvinalia]

You're a bot.

[Brian Peacock]

Nah. A bot would be more consistent.

[pErvinalia]

[JimC]

Nah. A bot would be more consistent.

How about a bot with a built-in randomiser?

[pErvinalia]

That would be Jonno!

[Forty Two]

When I see other feminists ostracize her for her opinions then get back to me

The self loathing pathetic maginas sad sacks on this site outdo a kink submission sub

I have absolutely no intention of doing anything of the short so do not be holding your breath. For I do not believe in denying anybody
free speech just because they think I belong in a concentration camp. But why do you care what she thinks anyway if you have such a
low opinion of her? By doing so you are letting her get to you which makes her psychologically stronger than you. I doubt very much if
anything you said about her would have the same effect. Calling her a cunt does not do it as that is about as unoriginal as it gets. But
any way she cares far less about what you think than you do about what she thinks. Remember that next time you go in to rant mode

Now if you think I am a mangina because of such opinions that bothers me about as much as it does Julie Bindel thinking I should be in
a concentration camp. Although I also agree with you one hundred per cent about issues such as male suicide and male rape which are
serious subjects in their own right. So then may be not such a magina after all though I really do not care which adjectives you wish to
describe me now. Because unlike you I believe in absolute free speech and so you can call me what ever you want. Words on computer
screens are no threat to me whether they be yours or Julie Bindels or somebody elses. And as such I do not want to see them censored

I never said she should be censored and I never will, though those who don't distance themselves or critique her views are offering tacit support.

Moronic. Does ignoring a racist make you a racist as well?

Not necessarily, but if a person makes a speech in favor of a racist public policy or law, and fellow panelists nod in agreement, and the audience claps and cheers, then that would seem be an expression of support.