Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Post by **DaveDodo007** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 3:09 am

rEvolutionist wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:I don't think this Dave person knows anything about Mr.Samsa at all. Both Rachel and DD have lady boners for Samsa. And Samsa is the goto white knight for all things feministy , not to mention social justice thingies.
You still don't get it do you, it is the censorship I'm against. Supporting the free speech only of people who agree with you is not supporting free speech at all.
You don't get it. Not a single person at that forum has stopped you from spouting your bigoted bullshit. Your ideas are merely, freely and openly mocked just as they are here. You are just butt hurt that no one takes you seriously. That doesn't make the site a "left wing circle jerk", it just means that the commentariot knows bullshit when it posts. Case in point: Nicko appears to hold some views in common with you, but he argues his points extremely well. You should emulate his style.

There is non so blind that will not see. I don't care if people agree with me or not. It is when they consider such views verboten is where the line is crossed. You are the authoritative horseshoe in action.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory

You are a concentration camp guard, you just think that most people agree with you then that makes you correct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum

Childish claims of 'butthurt', 'misogyny', 'sexism', are just your way of avoiding reality. It does help you cocoon yourself from opinions you don't like but that is hardly skepticism. When you grow up then get back to me otherwise there are bridges for sale that you should look in to.
I am right to question your intelligence, as what if the people become democracy oppose to you and your views.

Post by **pErvinalia** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 3:44 am

No, I just think you are a bigoted idiot.

Post by **DaveDodo007** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 3:52 am

rEvolutionist wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
hackenslash wrote:
Seth wrote:Personally, every one of my posts is a carefully constructed logical and rational Socratic argument intended to stimulate thought and debate in those with a wit-factor greater than 1.
That's a real shame, because without you actually saying this, one could operate under the illusion that you were a clever guy merely pretending to be a complete fucking moron.

Ah, well.
Oh do fuck off, you are full of it as you just swapped religion for an ideology. Look at me I pwned a couple of creationists, well whoopie doo. If you looked up moron in the dictionary there would be a picture of you. There is no evidence for god or gods and that fact as given you the ego that you don't deserve. You are still a gullible twat as only a feminist could be. Come at me bro.
Dave's on the piss again!

This is true but it is one of the occasions were I can live up to my drunken claim. hackenslash has shown himself to be nothing more than a bully who gets people banned if they do not agree with him. Feminists, I shit them so bring it on.

Post by **Scott1328** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 3:57 am

DaveDodo007 wrote: Snip blatant blustering

Maybe if you keep waving your dick around like this, you'll come to realize that you are in desperate need of phalloplasy.

Post by **DaveDodo007** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 4:04 am

rEvolutionist wrote:No, I just think you are a bigoted idiot.

Well how can i argue with such logic and well reasoned counter points. The left is intellectually bankrupt and now has to resort to insults and smears which wouldn't pass muster outside of the school yard, so thanks for proving me right.

Post by **DaveDodo007** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 4:08 am

Scott1328 wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote: Snip blatant blustering
Maybe if you keep waving your dick around like this, you'll come to realize that you are in desperate need of phalloplasy.

Maybe if you counted my points you might have a valid position to hold, though I wont be holding my breathe on that score.

Post by **Scott1328** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 4:17 am

I don't need to refute your shit at all. It is a matter of public record and you are embarrassingly unable to defend your views on Rationalia or RatSkep. You are so bad at this, I have wondered occasionally if you are secretly a plant by feminists to infiltrate the man-o-sphere to discredit them. Admit it, you are really Dana Delaria, right?

Post by **DaveDodo007** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:06 am

Scott1328 wrote:I don't need to refute your shit at all. It is a matter of public record and you are embarrassingly unable to defend your views on Rationalia or RatSkep. You are so bad at this, I have wondered occasionally if you are secretly a plant by feminists to infiltrate the man-o-sphere to discredit them. Admit it, you are really Dana Delaria, right?

Lol, the whole school yard cry that I have super powers but I'm not going to show you. How long are you going to promote the narrative that I have been discredited and still claim it holds water.

Just for the record and as you claim it is so easy just embarrass me one more time.

I have never heard of Dana Delaria as I don't follow the man-o-sphere as much as you like to think I do. Atheist creationists in a nutshell how embarrassing.

Post by **pErvinalia** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:20 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
hackenslash wrote:
Seth wrote:Personally, every one of my posts is a carefully constructed logical and rational Socratic argument intended to stimulate thought and debate in those with a wit-factor greater than 1.
That's a real shame, because without you actually saying this, one could operate under the illusion that you were a clever guy merely pretending to be a complete fucking moron.

Ah, well.
Oh do fuck off, you are full of it as you just swapped religion for an ideology. Look at me I pwned a couple of creationists, well whoopie doo. If you looked up moron in the dictionary there would be a picture of you. There is no evidence for god or gods and that fact as given you the ego that you don't deserve. You are still a gullible twat as only a feminist could be. Come at me bro.
Dave's on the piss again!
This is true but it is one of the occasions were I can live up to my drunken claim. hackenslash has shown himself to be nothing more than a bully who gets people banned if they do not agree with him. Feminists, I shit them so bring it on.

Dave, you couldn't argue your way out of a paper bag (mixed-metaphor FTW!1!). And both Hack and I are an order of magnitude better at abuse than you are you druken clown. Stop with the "bring it on, I'm so tuff" routine. You're a whiney little sook who can't take on men, so he takes on women. Pussy.

Post by **pErvinalia** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:23 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:No, I just think you are a bigoted idiot.
Well how can i argue with such logic and well reasoned counter points. The left is intellectually bankrupt and now has to resort to insults and smears which wouldn't pass muster outside of the school yard, so thanks for proving me right.

To be "right" you actually have to have a coherent argument. You've never given a coherent argument because you are either too drunk, or too stupid. Or both. The lefties like me are sick and tired of idiots fucking up the world for everyone else. You don't deserve respectful replies. You deserve to have your head stuck in a shitter and flushed.

Post by **pErvinalia** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:24 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote: Snip blatant blustering
Maybe if you keep waving your dick around like this, you'll come to realize that you are in desperate need of phalloplasy.
Maybe if you counted my points you might have a valid position to hold, though I wont be holding my breathe on that score.

It's "countered", dipshit.

Post by **JimC** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:30 am

Picky, picky...

Post by **DaveDodo007** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:31 am

Hack and Erv. Challenge accepted.

Post by **JimC** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:32 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:Hack and Erv. Challenge accepted.

Hack has left the building...

Post by **pErvinalia** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:35 am

Yeah, and rEv has demolished DD before. Yawn.

rationalia.com

Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Re: Rationalskepticism,lol part III.

Who is online