A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
-
NineOneFour
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:27 am
- About me: Married, ethnically German, hardcore Social Democrat, ex-Dittohead, ex-Libertarian, went to Catholic school, father was a religious cultist who thought he had the gift of prophecy and could communicate with the "other side".
..............................
So, had a weird life. Better now. - Location: Surrounded by fundies and mutants in Texas
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
I think I'll start a thread at Ratskep making shit up about Rationalia and see how many Rationalia-types take offense...
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Actually, you need to start a derail from an existing thread for parity. I won't take offense, unless you really, really want me to... like want me to enough to pay me.NineOneFour wrote:I think I'll start a thread at Ratskep making shit up about Rationalia and see how many Rationalia-types take offense...
Look, at least you have a chance to defend the reputation of RatSkep against any misconceptions here. That's an opportunity.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-
Tigger
- 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
- Posts: 15714
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
- About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
- Location: location location.
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
It's "offence".NineOneFour wrote:I think I'll start a thread at Ratskep making shit up about Rationalia and see how many Rationalia-types take offense...
*snigger*
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it
-
leo-rcc
- Robo-Warrior
- Posts: 7848
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:09 pm
- About me: Combat robot builder
- Location: Hoogvliet-Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
You can't cause as I understand it is against your rules to talk trash about groups where your own members are a part of.NineOneFour wrote:I think I'll start a thread at Ratskep making shit up about Rationalia and see how many Rationalia-types take offense...
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
-
Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
leo-rcc wrote:You can't cause as I understand it is against your rules to talk trash about groups where your own members are a part of.NineOneFour wrote:I think I'll start a thread at Ratskep making shit up about Rationalia and see how many Rationalia-types take offense...
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
But as long as you have a membership here, you are one of us, so it cancels out.leo-rcc wrote:You can't cause as I understand it is against your rules to talk trash about groups where your own members are a part of.NineOneFour wrote:I think I'll start a thread at Ratskep making shit up about Rationalia and see how many Rationalia-types take offense...
Or you could trash talk Rationalianology as a dangerous and silly cult. You won't get in trouble with RatSkep, but our inner circle will brand you as a Suppressive Person.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-
Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Or a Suppurating Person?
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
A scintillating parson?Bella Fortuna wrote:Or a Suppurating Person?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-
Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
A scleroderma patient?Robert_S wrote:A scintillating parson?Bella Fortuna wrote:Or a Suppurating Person?
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
schadenfreudian patent?Bella Fortuna wrote:A scleroderma patient?Robert_S wrote:A scintillating parson?Bella Fortuna wrote:Or a Suppurating Person?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
NineOneFour wrote:I think I'll start a thread at Ratskep making shit up about Rationalia and see how many Rationalia-types take offense...
I couldn't give a ratz arse.no fences
-
Thinking Aloud
- Page Bottomer
- Posts: 20111
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Don't recall any misanthropes dissing ratskep, so no.NineOneFour wrote:Kind of like misanthropes dissing ratskep, yes?Thinking Aloud wrote:Wow, nice first post in five months!Made Of Stars wrote:Wow, nice thread.
Mods, please deactivate my account.
So one thread that has an unusually large number of non-regular members arguing humourlessly about RatSkep has caused you to reject the whole of Rationalia and its membership?
Oh well...
http://thinking-aloud.co.uk/ Musical Me
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
I'll admit to bringing up the bit about not being able to call teabaggers teabaggers, but that wasn't dome in a mean spirit nor was it meant to dis RatSkep as a whole.Thinking Aloud wrote:Don't recall any misanthropes dissing ratskep, so no.NineOneFour wrote:Kind of like misanthropes dissing ratskep, yes?Thinking Aloud wrote:Wow, nice first post in five months!Made Of Stars wrote:Wow, nice thread.
Mods, please deactivate my account.
So one thread that has an unusually large number of non-regular members arguing humourlessly about RatSkep has caused you to reject the whole of Rationalia and its membership?
Oh well...
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Dissecting rats?Thinking Aloud wrote:Don't recall any misanthropes dissing ratskep, so no.
no fences
-
Thinking Aloud
- Page Bottomer
- Posts: 20111
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
In a cave, probably.Charlou wrote:Dissecting rats?Thinking Aloud wrote:Don't recall any misanthropes dissing ratskep, so no.
http://thinking-aloud.co.uk/ Musical Me
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests