ThisFBM wrote:I simply don't have enough information on RD's level of personal involvement in what happened. My opinion will remain unchanged until I get more info.

There: Shaker has spoken

ThisFBM wrote:I simply don't have enough information on RD's level of personal involvement in what happened. My opinion will remain unchanged until I get more info.
Come off it guys, stop trying to give RD a benefit of the doubt that he doesn't deserve. He either knew about it, (which makes him a cunt), or he didn't know about it, which would make him negligent to the point of senility. Either way, he's lost my respect.Shaker wrote:This. How much do we currently know about how much he knows?FBM wrote:I simply don't have enough information on RD's level of personal involvement in what happened. My opinion will remain unchanged until I get more info.
I agree. He was blissfully unaware in Oct. '08 (him and Josh apparently), but there should be no excuse this time. As you say: Either he's sanctioned this directly, or he's allowed our two friends such operational freedom and lack of accountability that they feel they can get away with this.Arse wrote:Come off it guys, stop trying to give RD a benefit of the doubt that he doesn't deserve. He either knew about it, (which makes him a cunt), or he didn't know about it, which would make him negligent to the point of senility. Either way, he's lost my respect.Shaker wrote:This. How much do we currently know about how much he knows?FBM wrote:I simply don't have enough information on RD's level of personal involvement in what happened. My opinion will remain unchanged until I get more info.
Or he was beguiled and deluded by a conniving twat with his own agenda that constantly reassured him that everything was under control and there would only be a modicum of dissent.Arse wrote:Come off it guys, stop trying to give RD a benefit of the doubt that he doesn't deserve. He either knew about it, (which makes him a cunt), or he didn't know about it, which would make him negligent to the point of senility. Either way, he's lost my respect.Shaker wrote:This. How much do we currently know about how much he knows?FBM wrote:I simply don't have enough information on RD's level of personal involvement in what happened. My opinion will remain unchanged until I get more info.
I don't think that's fair. The first option - absolutely true, and I am, or rather would be, in full agreement with you. The second I don't go along with. RD put his name to the site and used to drop in to post now and again, but all of the technical day-to-day gubbins is left to other people to do, delegation the same as in any business. I'm sure we can all come up with plenty of examples of various nefarious shenanigans which have occurred when the minions have been getting above themselves without the knowledge or consent of the suits on the golf course. All I'm saying at the moment is that we don't know which is which, and it's unfairly jumping the gun to start slandering the man before we do know.Arse wrote:Come off it guys, stop trying to give RD a benefit of the doubt that he doesn't deserve. He either knew about it, (which makes him a cunt), or he didn't know about it, which would make him negligent to the point of senility. Either way, he's lost my respect.Shaker wrote:This. How much do we currently know about how much he knows?FBM wrote:I simply don't have enough information on RD's level of personal involvement in what happened. My opinion will remain unchanged until I get more info.
If he fell for that then he still doesn't deserve my respect, nor any of the rest of yours, because that would be a stupid thing to believe. There are times when the buck stops with the guy at the top - no excuses, whatever the ins and outs of who did what - and this is one of them.Or he was beguiled and deluded by a conniving twat with his own agenda that constantly reassured him that everything was under control and there would only be a modicum of dissent.
In the words of our friend Arse: cunt.Either he's sanctioned this directly
Busy-ness-cum-lack of judgment. Not a hanging matter, in my view.or he's allowed our two friends such operational freedom and lack of accountability that they feel they can get away with this.
To be honest, I'm torn between sharing this sentiment and thinking that he should have had the balls to make the statement himself instead of hiding behind some code monkey.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I'm with Shaker. We don't know - it all happened less than 24 hours ago. Judgment deferred until RD makes a statement, or more facts become available.
Correct again, and he's already had a salient lesson from Oct. '08: Get people you can trust, and even then keep an eye on things yourself.Arse wrote:If he fell for that then he still doesn't deserve my respect, nor any of the rest of yours, because that would be a stupid thing to believe. There are times when the buck stops with the guy at the top - no excuses, whatever the ins and outs of who did what - and this is one of them.Or he was beguiled and deluded by a conniving twat with his own agenda that constantly reassured him that everything was under control and there would only be a modicum of dissent.
Again I go back to The Great PurgeTM. He should know by now that it's not a good idea to let himself be led by the nose in this manner.Shaker wrote:In the words of our friend Arse: cunt.Either he's sanctioned this directlyBusy-ness-cum-lack of judgment. Not a hanging matter, in my view.or he's allowed our two friends such operational freedom and lack of accountability that they feel they can get away with this.
And now that you say it, I agree.Heresiarch wrote:To be honest, I'm torn between sharing this sentiment and thinking that he should have had the balls to make the statement himself instead of hiding behind some code monkey.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:I'm with Shaker. We don't know - it all happened less than 24 hours ago. Judgment deferred until RD makes a statement, or more facts become available.
Nobody that is in charge of a large organisation knows everything that goes on. they delegate responsibility. Sometimes, they pick the wrong person to delegate to. This shit happens in every company, foundation and government. RD is not all-seeing and his interest in the forum has always been peripheral compared to his lectures, books and spreading the word about his vision of atheism. It is easy to blame the man at the top but far wiser IMO to take a step back and wait to see if they are deserving of that blame.Arse wrote:If he fell for that then he still doesn't deserve my respect, nor any of the rest of yours, because that would be a stupid thing to believe. There are times when the buck stops with the guy at the top - no excuses, whatever the ins and outs of who did what - and this is one of them.Or he was beguiled and deluded by a conniving twat with his own agenda that constantly reassured him that everything was under control and there would only be a modicum of dissent.
Trust me, RD can be hard-nosed and unforgiving when he feels like it.Shaker wrote:Maybe Xamonas and I are coming across like this fella:
with a sort of why-can't-we-all-just-get-along-and-be-reasonable sort of way, but what XC just said is bang on the money. RD wouldn't be the first figure to have left completely in the dark about what's been going on with his thing while he's away doing something else and he sure as shit won't be the last. Is that what happened? Fucked if I know. I just don't have a taste for sharpening the blade of Madame Guillotine until we found out more.
I'm too good for this world, me.
True. But this? It would be like the CEO of a corporation not realizing his underling was about to completely change the business model, start manufacturing cars instead of writing software, lay off a few tens of thousands of employees and burn the financial records.Xamonas Chegwé wrote: Nobody that is in charge of a large organisation knows everything that goes on. they delegate responsibility. Sometimes, they pick the wrong person to delegate to. This shit happens in every company, foundation and government. RD is not all-seeing and his interest in the forum has always been peripheral compared to his lectures, books and spreading the word about his vision of atheism. It is easy to blame the man at the top but far wiser IMO to take a step back and wait to see if they are deserving of that blame.
XC - face facts. Nobody - and I do mean NOBODY - allows someone to close an internet forum which bears their name, and then start mass deleting accounts and posts in such an arbitrary manner, unless they are...Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Nobody that is in charge of a large organisation knows everything that goes on. they delegate responsibility. Sometimes, they pick the wrong person to delegate to. This shit happens in every company, foundation and government. RD is not all-seeing and his interest in the forum has always been peripheral compared to his lectures, books and spreading the word about his vision of atheism. It is easy to blame the man at the top but far wiser IMO to take a step back and wait to see if they are deserving of that blame.Arse wrote:If he fell for that then he still doesn't deserve my respect, nor any of the rest of yours, because that would be a stupid thing to believe. There are times when the buck stops with the guy at the top - no excuses, whatever the ins and outs of who did what - and this is one of them.Or he was beguiled and deluded by a conniving twat with his own agenda that constantly reassured him that everything was under control and there would only be a modicum of dissent.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests