Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by Robert_S » Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:18 am

Cormac wrote: joint and several basis...
Several joints later...
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by klr » Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:20 am

Cormac wrote:
klr wrote:
JimC wrote:But where are the lawyers?

There ought to be lawyers...

Well, maybe next year...
Image
I feel discriminated against.

Please tell me your real names and real addresses so that I can issue summonses to each of you, on a joint and several basis...
The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers :mob:

Disclaimer: May not actually apply to all lawyers, or to all members of the legal profession. :shifty:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by Cormac » Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:06 pm

klr wrote:
Cormac wrote:
klr wrote:
JimC wrote:But where are the lawyers?

There ought to be lawyers...

Well, maybe next year...
Image
I feel discriminated against.

Please tell me your real names and real addresses so that I can issue summonses to each of you, on a joint and several basis...
The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers priests :mob:

Disclaimer: May not actually apply to all lawyers, or to all members of the legal clerical profession. :shifty:
:fixed:
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!

User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by Cormac » Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:14 pm

Double post...
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!

Callan
Invincible
Posts: 4637
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by Callan » Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:24 pm

Lawyers first, priests second.
Then all the priests' illegitimate children won't be able to sue us...
:plot:

User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by Cormac » Fri Jul 22, 2011 2:04 pm

Callan wrote:Lawyers first, priests second.
Then all the priests' illegitimate children won't be able to sue us...
:plot:
can I have your real name and address please? I wish to serve a summons...
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by lordpasternack » Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:47 am

I hate to be the one finding myself driving traffic towards Josh's blog - but Chalkers doesn't seem intent on doing it, though he PM'd me it the other day. Richard and RDFRS have filed a request for their case to be dismissed: http://joshtimonen.com/post/7865368424/ ... al-of-case

As I've already said, this doesn't mean Josh is absolved. It just means the management and organisation of things at RDFRS was shit (what a surprise), the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing, and Josh might have bankrolled Richard to the hilt and they have next to fuck all to show for it.

This is what I said to Richard in email the other day:
I still don't as yet have all the details, of course - but Chalkers informed me that your legal team has filed a notice to be dismissed. This was the right thing to do, because it's apparent that you don't even have a case to present. This doesn't mean Josh should be reinstated as a Christ figure - it just means that things going on behind the curtain to do with management and organisation were (and likely are) so shambolic and SNAFU that there isn't even a trace of a robust case against him to be found in any records anywhere - and so completely FUBAR that not even you were sure whether he had taken you for a ride or not.

But it's worse than that: you made the decision, or endorsed the decision, to go to court before you even understood that you had any kind of case to present. It took over half a year to work out what the case was, and then realise that you didn't have anything to hold it up. That is complete idiocy, profound naivety, gobsmacking negligence and utter incompetence of baffling magnitudes. Seriously, there are no words. Even if Josh grossly betrayed you - the non-case that you have to show for it should never have seen the light of day in a courtroom.

And with that said, I will add that from my vantage point, it looks almost as though you were bankrolled by Josh, and then bankrolled by this Greenberg guy on the rebound. Either he is incompetent, lawsuit-happy, or more than willing to take you for a ride around the block a few times if you're willing to pay the fare. If he didn't advise you to try to settle out of court, or advise you that your case was shambolic, flim-flam and unlikely to get anywhere, or advise you to bail out sooner, then I'd have deep suspicions about him…

And for that I feel sorry for you, Richard. Your patent naivety invokes both exasperation and sympathy - it's both endearing and aggravating - and I tend to give you a little more of the exasperation and aggravation. But I do feel sympathy here. Whatever is happening behind the scenes between those you thought you could trust, and whatever is happening with resignations and fallings out, is bound to be taking its toll a bit on you in whatever way.

...

Please accept my weary condolences over whatever drama is playing out behind the scenes.

Regards,

Heather
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by lordpasternack » Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:52 am

rachelbean wrote:Is this where we talk about lesbian sex? :FIO:
Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'... :dance:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by hadespussercats » Sat Jul 23, 2011 1:41 am

lordpasternack wrote:
rachelbean wrote:Is this where we talk about lesbian sex? :FIO:
Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'... :dance:
Well fine. :Erasb:
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by lordpasternack » Sat Jul 23, 2011 2:10 am

hadespussercats wrote:
lordpasternack wrote:
rachelbean wrote:Is this where we talk about lesbian sex? :FIO:
Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'... :dance:
Well fine. :Erasb:
I didn't want to presume your inclinations… The more the merrier… :pardon:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 19069
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by Cunt » Sat Jul 23, 2011 2:21 am

that is a lovely avatar, lordpasternack.

Aye.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.

User avatar
Geoff
Pouncer
Posts: 9374
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:39 pm
Location: Wigan, UK
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by Geoff » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:25 am

lordpasternack wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:
lordpasternack wrote:
rachelbean wrote:Is this where we talk about lesbian sex? :FIO:
Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'... :dance:
Well fine. :Erasb:
I didn't want to presume your inclinations… The more the merrier… :pardon:
Hot lesbian pregnant sex!

Aye!
Image
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41028
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by Svartalf » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:42 am

rachelbean wrote:Is this where we talk about lesbian sex? :FIO:
No, but you can send me those tapes with you and Eva for appraisal
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
borealis
Diggiloo Diggiley
Posts: 2329
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:01 am
About me: Oozy rat in a sanitary zoO.
Location: southern normaldy
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by borealis » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:54 am

hadespussercats wrote:
lordpasternack wrote:
rachelbean wrote:Is this where we talk about lesbian sex? :FIO:
Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'... :dance:
Well fine. :Erasb:
:toetap:
Azathoth wrote:
Bullshit is bullshit whatever you call it. It doesnt matter if it was an ancient nutter's fantasy or a more recent nutter's.



User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

Post by lordpasternack » Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:47 pm

borealis wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:
lordpasternack wrote:
rachelbean wrote:Is this where we talk about lesbian sex? :FIO:
Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'... :dance:
Well fine. :Erasb:
:toetap:
You told us you were straight! :Erasb:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests