Dawkins sues Josh Timonen 2

[Robert_S]

joint and several basis...

Several joints later...

[klr]

But where are the lawyers?

There ought to be lawyers...

Well, maybe next year...

I feel discriminated against.

Please tell me your real names and real addresses so that I can issue summonses to each of you, on a joint and several basis...

The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers

Disclaimer: May not actually apply to all lawyers, or to all members of the legal profession.

[Cormac]

But where are the lawyers?

There ought to be lawyers...

Well, maybe next year...

I feel discriminated against.

Please tell me your real names and real addresses so that I can issue summonses to each of you, on a joint and several basis...

The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers priests

Disclaimer: May not actually apply to all lawyers, or to all members of the legal clerical profession.

:fixed:

[Cormac]

Double post...

[Callan]

Lawyers first, priests second.
Then all the priests' illegitimate children won't be able to sue us...

[Cormac]

Lawyers first, priests second.
Then all the priests' illegitimate children won't be able to sue us...

can I have your real name and address please? I wish to serve a summons...

[lordpasternack]

I hate to be the one finding myself driving traffic towards Josh's blog - but Chalkers doesn't seem intent on doing it, though he PM'd me it the other day. Richard and RDFRS have filed a request for their case to be dismissed: http://joshtimonen.com/post/7865368424/ ... al-of-case

As I've already said, this doesn't mean Josh is absolved. It just means the management and organisation of things at RDFRS was shit (what a surprise), the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing, and Josh might have bankrolled Richard to the hilt and they have next to fuck all to show for it.

This is what I said to Richard in email the other day:

I still don't as yet have all the details, of course - but Chalkers informed me that your legal team has filed a notice to be dismissed. This was the right thing to do, because it's apparent that you don't even have a case to present. This doesn't mean Josh should be reinstated as a Christ figure - it just means that things going on behind the curtain to do with management and organisation were (and likely are) so shambolic and SNAFU that there isn't even a trace of a robust case against him to be found in any records anywhere - and so completely FUBAR that not even you were sure whether he had taken you for a ride or not.

But it's worse than that: you made the decision, or endorsed the decision, to go to court before you even understood that you had any kind of case to present. It took over half a year to work out what the case was, and then realise that you didn't have anything to hold it up. That is complete idiocy, profound naivety, gobsmacking negligence and utter incompetence of baffling magnitudes. Seriously, there are no words. Even if Josh grossly betrayed you - the non-case that you have to show for it should never have seen the light of day in a courtroom.

And with that said, I will add that from my vantage point, it looks almost as though you were bankrolled by Josh, and then bankrolled by this Greenberg guy on the rebound. Either he is incompetent, lawsuit-happy, or more than willing to take you for a ride around the block a few times if you're willing to pay the fare. If he didn't advise you to try to settle out of court, or advise you that your case was shambolic, flim-flam and unlikely to get anywhere, or advise you to bail out sooner, then I'd have deep suspicions about him…

And for that I feel sorry for you, Richard. Your patent naivety invokes both exasperation and sympathy - it's both endearing and aggravating - and I tend to give you a little more of the exasperation and aggravation. But I do feel sympathy here. Whatever is happening behind the scenes between those you thought you could trust, and whatever is happening with resignations and fallings out, is bound to be taking its toll a bit on you in whatever way.

...

Please accept my weary condolences over whatever drama is playing out behind the scenes.

Regards,

Heather

[lordpasternack]

Is this where we talk about lesbian sex?

Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'...

[hadespussercats]

Is this where we talk about lesbian sex?

Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'...

Well fine.

[lordpasternack]

Is this where we talk about lesbian sex?

Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'...

Well fine.

I didn't want to presume your inclinations… The more the merrier…

[Cunt]

that is a lovely avatar, lordpasternack.

Aye.

[Geoff]

Is this where we talk about lesbian sex?

Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'...

Well fine.

I didn't want to presume your inclinations… The more the merrier…

Hot lesbian pregnant sex!

Aye!

[Svartalf]

Is this where we talk about lesbian sex?

No, but you can send me those tapes with you and Eva for appraisal

[borealis]

Is this where we talk about lesbian sex?

Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'...

Well fine.

[lordpasternack]

Is this where we talk about lesbian sex?

Me, you, Eva, Millefleur, Mousy, Bella and Twoflower... All those in favour, say 'aye'...

Well fine.

You told us you were straight!