Oh shit, now I'm confused. Maybe it was Gawd who got banned for trolling in the philosophy section. Which one was it?95Theses wrote:Yes, here it is :Gawdzilla wrote: Got a list of everybody banned? And can you tell me that the reason they were banned wasn't at least partially because they didn't like the moderation style? And said so? The staff over there is a bit power-mad IMNSHO.
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/feedb ... t2022.html
And considering you boasted here about how you were going to go over to Ratskep and troll until you got banned, and you only managed to get two warnings before you got bored and fucked off I'm not sure how you can say everyone is power mad. You specifically tried to troll your way to a ban and didn't manage it.
A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
-
pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 60662
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
-
ozewiezeloose
- Account Suspended at Member's Request
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:19 pm
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Errr... so how about that evidence for people being banned for not liking moderation practices?! 
-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
"We're" not better than "they" are, and "they're" no better than "we" are. Pull yer fuggin' heads out of your fuggin' asses and get back to stompin' theists' bullshit into the ground/chilling with fellow atheists, OK?!?!1uno?! Jeebus fingerbangin' christ! What a bunch of dick-waving, holier-than-thou bullshit! We're on the same motherfucking team, you fucking booger-eating, mouth-breathing morons!!! Fuck!!
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 60662
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
And dickheads shouldn't be trolling, but apparently they were.Gawdzilla wrote:The mods shouldn't be playing favorites, and they were.NineOneFour wrote:Wow, that's what you're up in arms about?Gawdzilla wrote:Empirical. They gave me a hard time for even suggesting that philosophy was a fucking waste of time. Sacred topic, mustn't even suggest it.ozewiezeloose wrote:Proof?Gawdzilla wrote: Got a list of everybody banned? And can you tell me that the reason they were banned wasn't at least partially because they didn't like the moderation style? And said so? The staff over there is a bit power-mad IMNSHO.
Damn, dude.
Sad.
And so is honesty. Do you think it is honest to knowingly troll?Impartiality is important.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
-
Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
FBM wrote:"We're" not better than "they" are, and "they're" no better than "we" are. Pull yer fuggin' heads out of your fuggin' asses and get back to stompin' theists' bullshit into the ground/chilling with fellow atheists, OK?!?!1uno?! Jeebus fingerbangin' christ! What a bunch of dick-waving, holier-than-thou bullshit! We're on the same motherfucking team, you fucking booger-eating, mouth-breathing morons!!! Fuck!!
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Gawd was perma banned for being a known internet troll, he only ever posted about how evil all the jews were or something, he has taken up residence here and has had to have a whole subforum devoted to himself that other members can opt out from and never see what goes on inside it.rEvolutionist wrote:Oh shit, now I'm confused. Maybe it was Gawd who got banned for trolling in the philosophy section. Which one was it?95Theses wrote:Yes, here it is :Gawdzilla wrote: Got a list of everybody banned? And can you tell me that the reason they were banned wasn't at least partially because they didn't like the moderation style? And said so? The staff over there is a bit power-mad IMNSHO.
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/feedb ... t2022.html
And considering you boasted here about how you were going to go over to Ratskep and troll until you got banned, and you only managed to get two warnings before you got bored and fucked off I'm not sure how you can say everyone is power mad. You specifically tried to troll your way to a ban and didn't manage it.
Gawdzilla boasted about how much trolling he was going to do and then managed to get a couple of warnings for trolling before chucking his toys out of the pram and stomping off to complain heartily about how badly he had been treated. He trolled philosophy but still has an active account.
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. - Bertrand Russell.
-
Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Pappa wrote:FBM wrote:"We're" not better than "they" are, and "they're" no better than "we" are. Pull yer fuggin' heads out of your fuggin' asses and get back to stompin' theists' bullshit into the ground/chilling with fellow atheists, OK?!?!1uno?! Jeebus fingerbangin' christ! What a bunch of dick-waving, holier-than-thou bullshit! We're on the same motherfucking team, you fucking booger-eating, mouth-breathing morons!!! Fuck!!
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
-
pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 60662
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Ok, I see from the above few posts to this that you were the one who trolled the fuck out of that philosophy thread. There's nothing you could say now that would change my opinion of you. That was trolling of the highest order - even after being warned! WTF?!?Gawdzilla wrote:And how many realize they simply can't post there without being called a troll? And never come back? The lynch mob mentality is strong there if you attack a sacred cow.rEvolutionist wrote:FFS. As I intimated earlier - there's an exceedingly short list of people banned. Get a grip people.Ghatanothoa wrote:They get banned if they aren'tNineOneFour wrote:Yes.FBM wrote:rEv, like I said before, I don't post at RatSkep much, do you think the majority of the members there are satisfied/happy with its moderation?
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
-
pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 60662
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Gawdzilla wrote:The fucking serious discussion of philosophy was a thread I STARTED in pseudoscience, and the feather-duster squad sent to the fauxlosophy forum so the cheerleaders would see it. And it wasn't trolling, I was trying to make a point. But it was a sacred cow and those must never, ever be challenged.95Theses wrote:Oh come on that is just rubbish, you can make your point all you like but you don't get to just straight out lie about what happened.
You were initially advised not to troll what was up until that point a serious discussion about philosophy. The modnote even specifically stated that if you wanted to have a different discussion you could start one yourself in another section of the forum. I fail to see what is so heavy handed about allowing people to try and discuss something seriously and preventing you from deliberately and self admittedly trolling that thread.
look here is the actual modnote :
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... ml#p292556
MODNOTE
Gawdzilla - this is an advisory note for trolling. If you continue to troll this discussion, you are likely to receive a warning. This would be the same even if the thread were still in "pseudoscience" where you originally posted it. If you aren't interested in a genuine discussion about philosophy then you are free to start another thread about it in "Social & Fun", and this will leave others free to discuss this topic more seriously in here.
Please do not discuss moderation in this thread.
You're shitting us, right? 
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
And what team is that?FBM wrote:"We're" not better than "they" are, and "they're" no better than "we" are. Pull yer fuggin' heads out of your fuggin' asses and get back to stompin' theists' bullshit into the ground/chilling with fellow atheists, OK?!?!1uno?! Jeebus fingerbangin' christ! What a bunch of dick-waving, holier-than-thou bullshit! We're on the same motherfucking team, you fucking booger-eating, mouth-breathing morons!!! Fuck!!
Why, if we have criticisms, does that automatically equate to being 'better'?
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
-
devogue
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Clique in action.Bella Fortuna wrote:Pappa wrote:FBM wrote:"We're" not better than "they" are, and "they're" no better than "we" are. Pull yer fuggin' heads out of your fuggin' asses and get back to stompin' theists' bullshit into the ground/chilling with fellow atheists, OK?!?!1uno?! Jeebus fingerbangin' christ! What a bunch of dick-waving, holier-than-thou bullshit! We're on the same motherfucking team, you fucking booger-eating, mouth-breathing morons!!! Fuck!!
-
Bella Fortuna
- Sister Golden Hair
- Posts: 79685
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
- About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require. - Location: Scotlifornia
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Fuck off before we have you silenced. 
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/
-
FBM
- Ratz' first Gritizen.
- Posts: 45327
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
- About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach" - Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Y'all liked the "fingerbangin'" part, eh?Bella Fortuna wrote:Pappa wrote:FBM wrote:"We're" not better than "they" are, and "they're" no better than "we" are. Pull yer fuggin' heads out of your fuggin' asses and get back to stompin' theists' bullshit into the ground/chilling with fellow atheists, OK?!?!1uno?! Jeebus fingerbangin' christ! What a bunch of dick-waving, holier-than-thou bullshit! We're on the same motherfucking team, you fucking booger-eating, mouth-breathing morons!!! Fuck!!
Ateist/agnostics vs tribal bullshittists? Remember that?The Mad Hatter wrote:And what team is that?
Please. Note the tone of the foregoing discussion. This is holier-than-thou bullshit indistinguishable from that our theist brethren indulge in.Why, if we have criticisms, does that automatically equate to being 'better'?
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."
-
Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
That's why they still pretend to believe in that crap, for the dramaz!!!FBM wrote:Y'all liked the "fingerbangin'" part, eh?Bella Fortuna wrote:Pappa wrote:FBM wrote:"We're" not better than "they" are, and "they're" no better than "we" are. Pull yer fuggin' heads out of your fuggin' asses and get back to stompin' theists' bullshit into the ground/chilling with fellow atheists, OK?!?!1uno?! Jeebus fingerbangin' christ! What a bunch of dick-waving, holier-than-thou bullshit! We're on the same motherfucking team, you fucking booger-eating, mouth-breathing morons!!! Fuck!!
Ateist/agnostics vs tribal bullshittists? Remember that?The Mad Hatter wrote:And what team is that?
Please. Note the tone of the foregoing discussion. This is holier-than-thou bullshit indistinguishable from that our theist brethren indulge in.Why, if we have criticisms, does that automatically equate to being 'better'?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent
Were you being ironic, FBM?
FBM wrote:We're just more 'laid back'.
FBM wrote:"We're" not better than "they" are, and "they're" no better than "we" are. Pull yer fuggin' heads out of your fuggin' asses and get back to stompin' theists' bullshit into the ground/chilling with fellow atheists, OK?!?!1uno?! Jeebus fingerbangin' christ! What a bunch of dick-waving, holier-than-thou bullshit! We're on the same motherfucking team, you fucking booger-eating, mouth-breathing morons!!! Fuck!!
no fences
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests