DaveDodo007... I mean... Rationalskepticism,lol.

[Fallible]

I don't even.

[Mr.Samsa]

I don't even.

Are you bamboozled by my superior trolling skillzors?

[Fallible]

Like, totally.

[Mr.Samsa]

Like, totally.

Master trole strikes again.

[Fallible]

He's a trooollll man, doo doo dee-doo doo doo dee-doo.

[aspire1670]

I'm happy to concede that you are the biggest troll on the site, but I couldn't be 100% certain as I haven't been hanging out there much lately. SD would be the obvious contender.

I don't think Strontiu Dog is sharp enough to be a troll. He's in earnest about everything he posts online. Evidence his various claims to have an estimated IQ of 147 scored in an online test; to support 95% of Lib Dem policies; and to live in a Victorian town house. He's the Mr Pooter of the interwebs.

Oh look, it's my Internet stalker. Registered on any more forums under my real name lately?

I don't recall making the claims you've cited, although it's true I live in a Victorian town house (complete with original period features, natch), but as my official stalker, I rely on you to know these things, so whatever.

Dear Pooter, you keep making this claim about stalking but never produce any evidence to back it up.

It saddens me to learn you have lost your powers of recall but fortunately the interwebs can help jog your memory. With the power of google you can rediscover your claims and continue your promising career as a paper candidate in the local elections. Before I go, "town house", those words don't mean what you'ld like them to mean.

[aspire1670]

It was Samsa! I saw him do it! Scot Dutchy helped.

Me too; although apparently I post under the nym Strontium Dog. True fact, Strontium Dog says so.

[Fallible]

Wow, I only barely remember this stuff. It must be at least what 4 years old?

[Scott1328]

Regina has (apparently) quit the forum. Pulsar blames the goings on here

Just a short note to whom it may concern.
I'm outta here.

I wouldn't worry too much if I were you, Doug.

She's been gone before for some little while, and then returned again....

Don't count on it, Helen. Bridges have been burned, and I'm afraid some damage is irreversible. There are certain members here who've found a loophole in the FUA. They're using Rationalia to write what they really think about several Ratskep members. Attacking members on Ratskep isn't allowed, but attacking Ratskep members on other forums is without consequence. Or so they think, because of course there are consequences. I don't know what goes on in their mind, perhaps they don't realise that everyone can read their venomous attacks, perhaps they just don't care. Or perhaps they're fully aware of the damage they're causing, and this is exactly what they want. I find their behaviour cowardly, revolting, and extremely disappointing, even more so because it involves people who I thought had higher standards than mudslinging.

[Fallible]

I don't really understand that at all. rEv is the only one to have even alluded to her and he's banned from ratskep.

[Mr.Samsa]

I'm just so cowardly, talking candidly outside of RatSkep (what?).. What a brave person would do is to vaguely allude to someone doing something, randomly call it cowardly for no obvious reason, and then act all smug about it? Passive-aggressiveness is the new brave.

[Beatsong]

The problem is probably Metatron pushing for some kind of sanction for me because of our argument in the ADHD thread. I referred to his and Cito's theory that Big Pharma is drugging children to make money as an "aliens" theory (like the meme) and now Metatron thinks I'm "misrepresenting" him because he hasn't mentioned the word "aliens"

Where in that thread did Metatron say anything about "Big Pharma" (either by that term, or even a synonym)? And where did he mention money as the motivation for the drugging of children that he disagrees with?

[Strontium Dog]

I'm happy to concede that you are the biggest troll on the site, but I couldn't be 100% certain as I haven't been hanging out there much lately. SD would be the obvious contender.

I don't think Strontiu Dog is sharp enough to be a troll. He's in earnest about everything he posts online. Evidence his various claims to have an estimated IQ of 147 scored in an online test; to support 95% of Lib Dem policies; and to live in a Victorian town house. He's the Mr Pooter of the interwebs.

Oh look, it's my Internet stalker. Registered on any more forums under my real name lately?

I don't recall making the claims you've cited, although it's true I live in a Victorian town house (complete with original period features, natch), but as my official stalker, I rely on you to know these things, so whatever.

Dear Pooter, you keep making this claim about stalking but never produce any evidence to back it up.

It saddens me to learn you have lost your powers of recall but fortunately the interwebs can help jog your memory. With the power of google you can rediscover your claims and continue your promising career as a paper candidate in the local elections. Before I go, "town house", those words don't mean what you'ld like them to mean.

I wonder, how much evidence do I need to provide of your Internet stalking when every post of yours includes personal information about me, or, on occasion, members of my family.

Standing as a paper candidate isn't a "career". You know, like obsessively stalking people in the Internet isn't a career either.

Oh, and for your reference:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Townhouse

Happy to help.

[Mr.Samsa]

The problem is probably Metatron pushing for some kind of sanction for me because of our argument in the ADHD thread. I referred to his and Cito's theory that Big Pharma is drugging children to make money as an "aliens" theory (like the meme) and now Metatron thinks I'm "misrepresenting" him because he hasn't mentioned the word "aliens"

Where in that thread did Metatron say anything about "Big Pharma" (either by that term, or even a synonym)? And where did he mention money as the motivation for the drugging of children that he disagrees with?

That was his position, that 'normal' kids were being drugged for 'normal' behaviors.

[Beatsong]

The problem is probably Metatron pushing for some kind of sanction for me because of our argument in the ADHD thread. I referred to his and Cito's theory that Big Pharma is drugging children to make money as an "aliens" theory (like the meme) and now Metatron thinks I'm "misrepresenting" him because he hasn't mentioned the word "aliens"

Where in that thread did Metatron say anything about "Big Pharma" (either by that term, or even a synonym)? And where did he mention money as the motivation for the drugging of children that he disagrees with?

That was his position, that 'normal' kids were being drugged for 'normal' behaviors.

That's not what you said though. You specifically said WHO they were being drugged BY, and WHY.

Saying that "Big Pharma is drugging children" specifically suggests there is some kind of big drug company conspiracy behind it, not just that misguided psychiatrists are drugging children and happen to source those drugs from drug companies. And saying that "Big Pharma is drugging children to make money" specifically claims that their motivation for doing so is financial.

The problem is that Metatron never actually said either of those things. He never even said anything remotely like them. So basically you're making shit up here, and ascribing a position and statement to him that does not belong to him - aren't you? And that kind of sheds some light on his craaaaazy idea that you might be somehow misrepresenting him, doesn't it?