on the other hand, would you guys consider thinking about sticking together options?
Have you seen who's recommending it here, ad nauseam?Matt H wrote:It seems like Rational Skepticism was set up with the explicit purpose of taking on RD.net refugees, so I think that is our best bet.
Timonenfail wrote:We are all very excited about the new changes.
Quote-mine Dawkins wrote:If I ever had any doubts that RD.net needs to change, and rid itself of this particular aspect of Internet culture, they are dispelled by this episode.
That's what TAF was for us originally. Didn't work out as planned. Split-offs are bound to happen. Just as long as everyone finds a forum to call home!Matt H wrote:It seems like Rational Skepticism was set up with the explicit purpose of taking on RD.net refugees, so I think that is our best bet.
Most of us are planning to us both (perhaps they all say that I don't know) but I know many people are active members of a couple of forums.FIO wrote:That's what TAF was for us originally. Didn't work out as planned. Split-offs are bound to happen. Just as long as everyone finds a forum to call home!Matt H wrote:It seems like Rational Skepticism was set up with the explicit purpose of taking on RD.net refugees, so I think that is our best bet.
And, everyone that wants to is more than welcome to stay. Things are changing around here with our member list doubling, but change can be a good thing.
Timonenfail wrote:We are all very excited about the new changes.
Quote-mine Dawkins wrote:If I ever had any doubts that RD.net needs to change, and rid itself of this particular aspect of Internet culture, they are dispelled by this episode.
HughMcB wrote:Most of us are planning to us both (perhaps they all say that I don't know) but I know many people are active members of a couple of forums.FIO wrote:That's what TAF was for us originally. Didn't work out as planned. Split-offs are bound to happen. Just as long as everyone finds a forum to call home!Matt H wrote:It seems like Rational Skepticism was set up with the explicit purpose of taking on RD.net refugees, so I think that is our best bet.
And, everyone that wants to is more than welcome to stay. Things are changing around here with our member list doubling, but change can be a good thing.
You guys here have been so great that it will not be forgotten, no better place than to come for some shitzengigles!
I for one am turning Bi!
I'm glad somebody finally used that smilie properly.FIO wrote:HughMcB wrote:Most of us are planning to us both (perhaps they all say that I don't know) but I know many people are active members of a couple of forums.FIO wrote:That's what TAF was for us originally. Didn't work out as planned. Split-offs are bound to happen. Just as long as everyone finds a forum to call home!Matt H wrote:It seems like Rational Skepticism was set up with the explicit purpose of taking on RD.net refugees, so I think that is our best bet.
And, everyone that wants to is more than welcome to stay. Things are changing around here with our member list doubling, but change can be a good thing.
You guys here have been so great that it will not be forgotten, no better place than to come for some shitzengigles!
I for one am turning Bi!
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”
), the wretched man had become a 'golden calf' that we Israelites were cavorting around. Now, horror of horrors, the emperor has been glimpsed butt naked (by his own hand, no less!), with the same frailties as anyone else. He was either complicit or incompetent in the disgraceful machinations of these past few days.
Different missions than we have, I think. Badly handled because they're not part of the community, but there it is.Galaxian wrote:One things for sure; I'm not grovelling to the proposed future RDF for permission to post new threads. WTF do they think they are? These are FORUMS, not quarterly science journals. I must say, I was disappointed at PZ Myers Blog. He's obviously out of touch, as Dawkins is.
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”
Delighted to have you, if what we have here suits you then you'll suit us just fine toodylan wrote:I was kind of hoping most stay here!
I've been a little.klr wrote:Have you seen who's recommending it here, ad nauseam?Matt H wrote:It seems like Rational Skepticism was set up with the explicit purpose of taking on RD.net refugees, so I think that is our best bet.
... but I was just passing it on after I read others saying that this is where most people are coming. Timonenfail wrote:We are all very excited about the new changes.
Quote-mine Dawkins wrote:If I ever had any doubts that RD.net needs to change, and rid itself of this particular aspect of Internet culture, they are dispelled by this episode.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
