Conservatives: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Data!

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 24629
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: Something something birds
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Conservatives: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Data!

Post by Tero » Thu Jun 29, 2017 3:32 pm

https://web.archive.org/web/20160731190 ... ate_en.pdf

labeled as occupational hazard. Low risk to consumers of crops
Schinasi L, Leon ME (Apr 2014). "Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and occupational exposure to agricultural pesticide chemical groups and active ingredients: a systematic review and meta-analysis". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 11 (4): 4449–527. PMC 4025008 Freely accessible. PMID 24762670. doi:10.3390/ijerph110404449.
http://karireport.blogspot.com/ (:_funny_:)
http://esapolitics.blogspot.com/
Dominus vo-bisque'em Et cum spear a tu-tu, oh!

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 13004
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I identify as sexually arousing to women.
Contact:

Re: Conservatives: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Data!

Post by Forty Two » Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:25 pm

March 25, 2017 - https://echa.europa.eu/-/glyphosate-not ... en-by-echa

Not a carcinogen. It "...concluded that the available scientific evidence did not meet the criteria to classify glyphosate as a carcinogen, as a mutagen or as toxic for reproduction."
"Every socialistic type of government… produces bad art, produces social inertia, produces really unhappy people, and it's more repressive than any other kind of government." Frank Zappa.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest