BBC article about the influence of 1066 on English

Post Reply
User avatar
Elessarina
Bearer of Anduril
Bearer of Anduril
Posts: 9517
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
Location: Rivendell
Contact:

BBC article about the influence of 1066 on English

Post by Elessarina » Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:21 am



User avatar
Elessarina
Bearer of Anduril
Bearer of Anduril
Posts: 9517
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
Location: Rivendell
Contact:

Re: BBC article about the influence of 1066 on English

Post by Elessarina » Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:13 am

Posse Comitatus wrote:Thanks.
I thought it was interesting :sighsm:


User avatar
Deep Sea Isopod
Bathynomus giganteus
Posts: 7806
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
Location: Gods blind spot.
Contact:

Re: BBC article about the influence of 1066 on English

Post by Deep Sea Isopod » Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:07 am

Norman names such as Norman
:fix:



:hehe:
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous Image

Image

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: BBC article about the influence of 1066 on English

Post by Rum » Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:12 am

It *is* interesting.

As an aside I was discussing the Norman conquest with my dad the other day (as you do) and as a slip of the tongue my dad referred to William as 'Norman the Conqueror'

Oh how we laughed. :coffee:

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: BBC article about the influence of 1066 on English

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:47 pm

Rum wrote:It *is* interesting.

As an aside I was discussing the Norman conquest with my dad the other day (as you do) and as a slip of the tongue my dad referred to William as 'Norman the Conqueror'

Oh how we laughed. :coffee:
The correct name is William the Bastard.
Image

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 40895
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: BBC article about the influence of 1066 on English

Post by Svartalf » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:13 pm

Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
Norman names such as Norman
:fix:



:hehe:
Actually, Norman is the Southernized form of an old Viking name : Thormod (Tormoid in Scottish Gaelic) ... but in English language texts, clan chiefs bearing the name Tormod in the original get called Norman instead.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 40895
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: BBC article about the influence of 1066 on English

Post by Svartalf » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:14 pm

Horwood Beer-Master wrote:
Rum wrote:It *is* interesting.

As an aside I was discussing the Norman conquest with my dad the other day (as you do) and as a slip of the tongue my dad referred to William as 'Norman the Conqueror'

Oh how we laughed. :coffee:
The correct name is William the Bastard.
Quite. :mrgreen:

Also, how come you folk find this "interesting" while my reaction was "meh, is there anything I don't know yet in there?"?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: BBC article about the influence of 1066 on English

Post by Lozzer » Sun Sep 12, 2010 7:29 pm

Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
Norman names such as Norman
:fix:



:hehe:
:funny:
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: BBC article about the influence of 1066 on English

Post by mistermack » Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:04 pm

I've got a suspicion that the Normans were able to conquor England for the same reason that England was able to build an empire later.
Being conquored was something like a general election today.
We always read how harsh the Normans were as rulers, but we have no idea how harsh it was being ruled by some Anglo Saxon king. The british empire was built by replacing incredibly harsh regimes. If you're a peasant living a miserable life, downtrodden by your rulers, you are not likely to fight to the death to preserve that rule.
Of course, when you find out the new lot are even worse, it's too late.
It's very like a general election really, except that the elections are less regular.
.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests