Racism about islam can't exist: islam isn't a race: Poll

[pErvinalia]

Islam is culturally expansionist and violent, and incompatible with the pacific ideals of post colonisation Western civilisation... we better eliminate its members except we're already invaded and they can carry the war in our own lands... I guess we're doomed, or it will be a looooong period to get rid of them.

so, am I racist or just a xenophobe?

A psychopath?

[Svartalf]

No, I'd be that if I advocated nuking Mecca, which I haven't done yet.

Plus, we already have the history of Spain to show us what might happen to Europe at large if we don't react, and efficiently so.

[Exi5tentialist]

well, there's no such thing as race, so it is essentially defined by the racists.

What's defined by racists? Racism or race?

What do you think?

Race, ffs.

So you accept the racists' definition of racism?

Btw. Stop being ambiguous in your answers. You'll get less angry that way.

[pErvinalia]

No, I'd be that if I advocated nuking Mecca, which I haven't done yet.

Plus, we already have the history of Spain to show us what might happen to Europe at large if we don't react, and efficiently so.

but you want to eliminate its members. That's Seth level of whackery.

[Svartalf]

Hey, in that "what furreners dig about the US" thread, I did say I dug the 2nd amendment

[pErvinalia]

well, there's no such thing as race, so it is essentially defined by the racists.

What's defined by racists? Racism or race?

What do you think?

Race, ffs.

So you accept the racists' definition of racism?

Who else's are you going to accept? Race doesn't exist.

Btw. Stop being ambiguous in your answers. You'll get less angry that way.

I'm not angry, I'm tired of your trolling.

My answers aren't ambiguous. Your reading level is substandard. There was only ONE subject in my sentence before I said "it is.... defined by the racists". So "it" can ONLY be referring to that subject, which was race.

[Exi5tentialist]

I'm not angry, I'm tired of your trolling.

My answers aren't ambiguous. Your reading level is substandard. There was only ONE subject in my sentence before I said "it is.... defined by the racists". So "it" can ONLY be referring to that subject, which was race.

Yeah but you keep referring to points you've made in previous posts. In that context "it" becomes ambiguous. If anything my reading is super-standard, it's your writing that's the problem. And you keep using these dehumanising epithets like calling me it and saying I'm trolling which are just your way of trying to up the ante on influencing the collective mood against me. Maybe your puny efforts will work.

Anyway, Richard Dawkins is a racist. A complete, total and utter one. Sorry, that's just the way it is

[pErvinalia]

I'm not angry, I'm tired of your trolling.

My answers aren't ambiguous. Your reading level is substandard. There was only ONE subject in my sentence before I said "it is.... defined by the racists". So "it" can ONLY be referring to that subject, which was race.

Yeah but you keep referring to points you've made in previous posts. In that context "it" becomes ambiguous.

Unless it's totally unambiguous like when I clearly mention the subject of the sentence like I did.

If anything my reading is super-standard, it's your writing that's the problem. And you keep using these dehumanising epithets like calling me it and saying I'm trolling which are just your way of trying to up the ante on influencing the collective mood against me. Maybe your puny efforts will work.

Why do you think there is a grand plan? Are you a conspiracy theorist? I'm just calling it as I see it. You are clearly trolling in some instances. You know it, we know it. Stop being a sook. Just up your game and start debating honestly and then you'll find you'll get some respect back.

Anyway, Richard Dawkins is a racist. A complete, total and utter one. Sorry, that's just the way it is

Yes, we know you hold that view, as you've said it about 15 times already. Problem is, you haven't provided a single piece of evidence to back it up.

[Exi5tentialist]

Unless it's totally unambiguous like when I clearly mention the subject of the sentence like I did.

I already answered that point.

[Exi5tentialist]

Anyway, Richard Dawkins is a racist. A complete, total and utter one. Sorry, that's just the way it is

Yes, we know you hold that view, as you've said it about 15 times already. Problem is, you haven't provided a single piece of evidence to back it up.

I already provided the evidence of that.

[pErvinalia]

Unless it's totally unambiguous like when I clearly mention the subject of the sentence like I did.

I already answered that point.

And I already pointed out why your understanding of English is wrong.

God you are a bore.

[pErvinalia]

Anyway, Richard Dawkins is a racist. A complete, total and utter one. Sorry, that's just the way it is

Yes, we know you hold that view, as you've said it about 15 times already. Problem is, you haven't provided a single piece of evidence to back it up.

I already provided the evidence of that.

No you didn't.

[Exi5tentialist]

And I already pointed out why your understanding of English is wrong.

I already refuted that.

[Exi5tentialist]

Anyway, Richard Dawkins is a racist. A complete, total and utter one. Sorry, that's just the way it is

Yes, we know you hold that view, as you've said it about 15 times already. Problem is, you haven't provided a single piece of evidence to back it up.

I already provided the evidence of that.

No you didn't.

Oh for heaven's sake. Read the thread. It's there in black and white.

And stop trolling.

[Svartalf]

and this thread has become boring too, thanks to the two of you, shouldn't you have a special thread to hold your off topic bickering?