Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Robert_S » Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:33 am

Peter Dreier E.P. Clapp Distinguished Professor of Politics, Occidental College wrote:
Rosa Parks and Mother Teresa -- Justice vs. Charity


On Thursday the Washington National Cathedral dedicated a new stone carving of Rosa Parks. It will be displayed in the Cathedral's Human Rights Porch.

The area already includes likenesses of Oscar Romero, the brave Catholic Archbishop of El Salvador, who spoke out against the U.S. for giving military aid to his country's military junta and was killed in 1980 for his activism with workers and peasants fighting the regime; Eleanor Roosevelt, who came from a privileged background but used her position as first lady to be an ally with unions, civil rights groups, feminists, and other progressive movements; and John T. Walker, the first African American bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington and an activist who was an ally of South Africa's Archbishop Desmond Tutu and was once arrested at a protest rally against apartheid at the South African Embassy.

In a piece about the event broadcast on Saturday, National Public Radio's Scott Simon reported that the statue of Parks was commissioned along with a carving of Mother Teresa that will be dedicated later this year.

"They may have much to talk about," Simon proclaimed at the end of the four-minute segment.

A conversation between Rosa Parks and Mother Teresa would indeed be interesting. But it would probably not go along the lines that Simon's glib comment implied, as if the seamstress and the nun shared a common approach to addressing the world's ills. In fact, the statement on the National Cathedral's website, that Parks and Mother Teresa belong in an area honoring "those who struggle to bring equality and social justice to all people" is incredibly misleading. Parks certainly fits that description, but Mother Teresa most certainly does not.

Article continues
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Ayaan
Queen of the Infidels
Posts: 19533
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:12 am
About me: AKA: Sciwoman
Location: Married to Gawdzilla and living in Missouri. What the hell have I gotten myself into?
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Ayaan » Sat Jun 09, 2012 1:56 am

Rosa Parks worked to stop an injustice. Mother Teresa gloried suffering and pain, and her acolytes continue to do so. Rosa Parks would smack Teresa upside the head for treating fellow human beings in such an appalling manner.
"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." ♥ Robert A. Heinlein
Image
“Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself; (I am large, I contain multitudes.)”-Walt Whitman from Song of Myself, Leaves of Grass
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.~Ripley
The Internet: The Big Book of Everything ~ Gawdzilla Sama

User avatar
amused
amused
Posts: 3873
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
About me: Reinvention phase initiated
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by amused » Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:09 am

Ayaan wrote:Rosa Parks worked to stop an injustice. Mother Teresa gloried suffering and pain, and her acolytes continue to do so. Rosa Parks would smack Teresa upside the head for treating fellow human beings in such an appalling manner.
Yup. According to The Hitch, "Mother" Teresa believed that the pain and suffering of other people brought her closer to her god.

An evil little bitch that enjoys suffering, and priests that inflict suffering on little boys.*

Religion at its finest!



*Which of course, as we all know, whether we want to admit it or not, and if you don't admit it then you're obviously part of the problem, reflects the basic attitude of all catlicks everywhere, every single one, past, present, and future with no exceptions because it's just easier to paint with a broad brush.

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:47 am

Exactly - Hitch's book was an eye-opener for me.
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Audley Strange » Sat Jun 09, 2012 3:14 am

I would not be surprised if one day we find out that Rosa Parks hated the Chinese, was a regular fare dodger and financial supporter of the Vietnam war or something.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Tyrannical » Sat Jun 09, 2012 3:37 am

Mother Teresa worked to help others, Rosa Park spoke up to help herself.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Jason » Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:06 am

Mother Teresa stood up for what she believed in. Rosa Parks just sat on her ass.

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by FBM » Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:08 am

They were both ultimately self-serving, like everyone else. MT to get her ass into heaven and RP to get hers on the front seat of a bus.
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Tyrannical » Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:11 am

amused wrote:
Ayaan wrote:Rosa Parks worked to stop an injustice. Mother Teresa gloried suffering and pain, and her acolytes continue to do so. Rosa Parks would smack Teresa upside the head for treating fellow human beings in such an appalling manner.
Yup. According to The Hitch, "Mother" Teresa believed that the pain and suffering of other people brought her closer to her god.

An evil little bitch that enjoys suffering, and priests that inflict suffering on little boys.*

Religion at its finest!



*Which of course, as we all know, whether we want to admit it or not, and if you don't admit it then you're obviously part of the problem, reflects the basic attitude of all catlicks everywhere, every single one, past, present, and future with no exceptions because it's just easier to paint with a broad brush.
I'm pretty sure that Mother Teresa derived her joy from helping those suffering in pain. Not by inflicting it, or reveling in another's suffering.
You don't really believe that crap that you spout, do you? :fp:
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:13 am

Audley Strange wrote:I would not be surprised if one day we find out that Rosa Parks hated the Chinese, was a regular fare dodger and financial supporter of the Vietnam war or something.
Where's Hitch when you need him, eh?
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Tyrannical » Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:13 am

FBM wrote:They were both ultimately self-serving, like everyone else. MT to get her ass into heaven and RP to get hers on the front seat of a bus.
I think MT went above and beyond what she needed to do to get to heaven, at least I hope so :hehe:
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Robert_S » Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:40 am

Tyrannical wrote: I'm pretty sure that Mother Teresa derived her joy from helping those suffering in pain. Not by inflicting it, or reveling in another's suffering.
You don't really believe that crap that you spout, do you? :fp:
To the point where she would not lift a finger to do a single damn thing about the source of their pain. She was a pain vampire.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41043
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Svartalf » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:26 am

Ayaan wrote:Rosa Parks worked to stop an injustice. Mother Teresa gloried suffering and pain, and her acolytes continue to do so. Rosa Parks would smack Teresa upside the head for treating fellow human beings in such an appalling manner.
:this:
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41043
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Svartalf » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:30 am

Tyrannical wrote:Mother Teresa worked to help others, Rosa Park spoke up to help herself.
:roll: Theresa did not so much work to help others as practice self aggrandizement by showing off what the passed for charity... the way that she (and the people under her) treated the poor they were supposed to help was apalling... no humility, no generosity, no empathy.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41043
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Rosa Parks vs Mother Teresa

Post by Svartalf » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:33 am

Tyrannical wrote:
amused wrote:
Ayaan wrote:Rosa Parks worked to stop an injustice. Mother Teresa gloried suffering and pain, and her acolytes continue to do so. Rosa Parks would smack Teresa upside the head for treating fellow human beings in such an appalling manner.
Yup. According to The Hitch, "Mother" Teresa believed that the pain and suffering of other people brought her closer to her god.

An evil little bitch that enjoys suffering, and priests that inflict suffering on little boys.*

Religion at its finest!



*Which of course, as we all know, whether we want to admit it or not, and if you don't admit it then you're obviously part of the problem, reflects the basic attitude of all catlicks everywhere, every single one, past, present, and future with no exceptions because it's just easier to paint with a broad brush.
I'm pretty sure that Mother Teresa derived her joy from helping those suffering in pain. Not by inflicting it, or reveling in another's suffering.
You don't really believe that crap that you spout, do you? :fp:
Actually, I believe she took joy in suffering, period, in true sado masochist fashion, this stemming from a belief that suffering earned you brownie points to get a seat in heaven.
So she worked to prolong her charges' lives, but not to allay their suffering.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests