rEvolutionist wrote:Seth, my only hope is that when you reread what you've written here in a few weeks (months?) time, you'll realise how atrocious your "rebuttals" are.
I doubt it. My rebuttals are properly aligned with the quality of the claims you make. I don't waste my best work on the likes of you.
And yet you do, ad nauseam.There's no point me continuing.
Not to you. But then again you're not exactly the audience I'm playing to. They are a good deal more sophisticated and intelligent and thus more likely to discern the subtleties of my rebuttals that fly past your turtle-like mind at the speed of light.Your rebuttals don't even make sense,
and you are never going to accept logic and reasoning.
If you demonstrated any, I might be persuaded to accept it. Sorry to say so far I haven't seen any evidence of either from you.
There's a clue there for those with the wit to understand it. I'm not going to bother explaining to you why it's not an accident, oversight or failure in reasoning.You are a dog's breakfast. Your arguments on the same point change from thread to thread
Or, you don't understand the sophisticated rhetoric I use and you miss the subtle points I make that demonstrate just how ignorant and pointless your diatribes are. I'm putting my money on that.You are either a liar, or utterly bonkers and don't realise what you are doing. Either way, that's not an enticing invitation to engage you in debate.