JimC wrote:Galaxian wrote:JimC wrote:Just noted Galaxian logged in...
I want a cage fight between Galaxian and
Exi5 !

Who is Exi5 ? Done a search, can't find him/her. But I'll be his/her Huckleberry, given half a chance.

It is our pet name for Exi5stentialist, the contents of whose posts are almost as annoying as the contents of your's...
(note careful lack of PA...)
Thank you. Found the critter. Quite an erudite character, but rather pedantic & labored in compositions; zooms in on individual trees.
Whereas Galaxian is a generalist; cuts away the undergrowth, looks at the overall forest & is not pedantic... lets minor infractions pass so as to focus on the essential objective.
So, in this post,
http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 0#p1642039 Exi5stentialist misses the possibility that there's more going on behind the scenes in forums than the obvious rules or FUA. As a case in point, Galaxian was suspended for following moderator advice in how to compose a post. Indeed I copied the moderator's sentence word for word, and was suspended for several months.
And later, my ban from RatSkep was based on nothing in the FUA, but simply being a contrarian & anti-establishment figure; holding a mirror up to social mantras & killing sacred cows. Whereas Exi5tentialist thinks that organizations such as forums can, theoretically, have good & fair governance, forgetting that maybe some have been set up by ruling powers for a purpose, a sinister agenda, as honeypots, as distractions, as relief valves & to keep tabs on potential troublemakers, as propaganda disseminators using paid or 'useful idiot' members, & so forth. 'Nuf said.
