Women on top

[pErvinalia]

I discuss topics, without attacking people, all the time. The problem for you is that you are one of the people that draw my ire, so you have a biased view of it.

Oh, you state an opinion sometimes, usually in some vague way that is open to interpretation, and most often without any argument or evidence. But "discuss topics?" Rarely, at best. And, there is hardly a thread in which your participation does not descend into namecalling and badgering, and off topic bullshit, whether your ire is directed at me or someone else. And, nobody gives a fuck what "draws your ire." That's your own narcissism that leads you to believe that it's important for your view of others, and your judgments of others, as good, bad or whatever, means anything in connection with topic under discussion or a given thread. Your "ire" is one of the things that commonly derails threads, and turns them into badminton games of shitposting, all in the name of you feeling you need to try to control what other people talk about.

Good for you. Some of us DO care if he is bigoted. Are you going to be ok with that?

Whether you think he is or is not a bigot is off topic, and a personal attack on him.

Well I was careful to talk of his "bigotry" earlier. That "bigoted" comment slipped out. I'll rephrase: Some of us DO care if his posts display bigotry.[/quote]

If people went to threads you create and just continually discussed what they didn't like about you personally, or your attitudes and opinions, then I think you'd see how tiresome it becomes.

You apparently haven't worked out yet how tiresome it is to continually deal with your misrepresentations/misinterpretations and, on occasion, outright lies.

It has nothing to do with the topic. It's your way of trolling people and engaging in personal attacks, because that's the "type of person" you are.

Care factor zero. Cunt is the biggest troller on these boards. It's cute how you stand up for reprehensible behaviour, though.

How is he trolling you? Link to it. And, there is nothing reprehensible about this thread.

Represensible behavior? If anyone's behavior is reprehensible, it's yours. Cunt is talking about a topic you find reprehensible here. His behavior is not reprehensible, not on this thread. Yours is, because what you're trying to do is interfere with discussion, not participate in it.[/quote]God you are a piece of work. Do you need a safe space?

[pErvinalia]

You're virtue signalling to your MRA buddies.

To go by your words, MRA folk don't exist outside of this forum.

I never said anything of the sort. Are you serious or just trolling?

You have had ample opportunity to identify some public/celebrity MRA's, but you keep avoiding real discussion about your 'position'.

Why the fuck would I need to identify some public/celebrity MRAs? That would be like asking me to identify some public/celebrity Republicans. Pointless and inane.

But just to shut your inane fuckery up - https://www.marieclaire.com/culture/a16 ... -activist/
Make sure you follow the link to A Voice For Men.

Great job on spelling words though, pErvinalia! Keep up the good work! You are doing great!

"Spelling words"... The new OCD/Tourettes phrase dujour. Let's keep count.

Feminism IS the patriarchy, and you help to underline that fact with every post you make! (imagine how good you would feel about your antics if your opinions were not on the safe side of politics lol)

The left is the safe side of politics?

[pErvinalia]

Why not look at one issue, Rum? Like the wage gap. Do you think wages should be fair for women? Or for everyone?

You are acting as though they are mutually exclusive. They're not.

[Seabass]

When it comes to millenial men, women are tired of their bullshit, and the ladies want the soy boys to man up and get back with the program. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinkin ... our-fault/

A study published last month confirms just how useless many modern men have become. Only one in five young men would feel confident tackling a dripping tap. Two thirds of millennial males don't know how to change the oil in their car. And just three in ten men are comfortable with the assembly of flat pack furniture.

I have spent a good deal of time rolling my eyes at millennial men who lunge at the Yellow Pages at the first sign of manual labour. I am fully aware that the majority of my friends would be stranded at the side of the motorway if their cars developed a puncture. Indeed, when my last year of university drew to a close, I'm almost positive that I was the only male student in my year to not only own a socket wrench, but to have used it as well.

LOL. Oh, Millennials.... back to the video games with you, I guess!

Men used to fight each other with spears and swords. You're a fucking pussy compared to previous generations. Is that a bad thing? And women are getting manlier with each generation. They used to stay home barefoot and pregnant, and now they're out in the workforce. Is that bad?

Tomi Lahren is a dumb bitch and you're a judgemental fucking dinosaur who can't stomach change.

Well? Is your generation, or is it not, a bunch of candy asses compared to previous generations? If so, is that good or bad?

You seem to be oblivious to the fact that from the perspective of man who has split another man in two with his battle axe on a medieval battlefield, you are a pathetic, weak, effeminate soy boy.

Perhaps instead of sitting on your fat ass in front of your computer raging at teens and college kids, you should think about how cultures have changed throughout history and accept that they will continue to change long after you're gone.

[JimC]

Remember the no name bit.The name tell a lot.

There's been research, mentioned in both the newspapers here and in New Scientist, where job applications were made with typical Anglo names, vs Middle Eastern names. A much higher proportion of the applications with Anglo names were replied to, and interviews invited...

[JimC]

In the US, women are better at keeping their jobs during a recession. Of those who lost their jobs due to the recession that started 10 years ago, 80% were men.

That isn't discrimination against men, of course, just because they were disproportionately let go from their jobs. That's discrimination against women, because the patriarchy caused them to have to remain in their jobs disproportionately, while men got to take time off and collect unemployment.

Blue collar jobs, held by a disproportionate number of men, were lost because of clear, straightforward economic factors as manufacturing jobs shifted out of the US. No gender bias either way...

[Svartalf]

Remember the no name bit.The name tell a lot.

There's been research, mentioned in both the newspapers here and in New Scientist, where job applications were made with typical Anglo names, vs Middle Eastern names. A much higher proportion of the applications with Anglo names were replied to, and interviews invited...

Same thing here, people with Arabic or African soundeing names, or from certain 'overrun' areas do tend to get fewer responses to their job applications than those with good European names (even if those are abviously Portuguese or Italian, who were subject to racism in their own time)and from 'well frequented' districts or towns.

[Cunt]

You have had ample opportunity to identify some public/celebrity MRA's, but you keep avoiding real discussion about your 'position'.

Why the fuck would I need to identify some public/celebrity MRAs? That would be like asking me to identify some public/celebrity Republicans. Pointless and inane.

It is because instead of simply labelling you 'anti-MRA', I would like to know what exactly it is you are against. If I disagree with THAT, then there is something we might learn from each other.

But just to shut your inane fuckery up - https://www.marieclaire.com/culture/a16 ... -activist/
Make sure you follow the link to A Voice For Men.

I didn't follow into 'A Voice For Men', but reading through it, there were a lot of things said. Do you care to say exactly what he said that you disagreed with?

Or am I to guess what it is you disdain about him and his causes?

Great job on spelling words though, pErvinalia! Keep up the good work! You are doing great!

"Spelling words"... The new OCD/Tourettes phrase dujour. Let's keep count.

Just trying to find something positive to compliment you on.

It's not easy.

Feminism IS the patriarchy, and you help to underline that fact with every post you make! (imagine how good you would feel about your antics if your opinions were not on the safe side of politics lol)

The left is the safe side of politics?

A bunch of fatties can crowd into a public space, wearing cunt hats, while screaming about the government being corrupt. Without expecting any consequences.

What do you think would happen if an old guy was caught merely saying pussy?

You are on the safe side of politics. The safe-space side, too. How brave and avant-garde of you! Wow!

[pErvinalia]

The left is the safe side in academic and intellectual circles. But it's definitely not the safe side in the rest of society. Society is fairly conservative, and it's only because of the single issue of labour that the left gets many votes at all.

[Cunt]

The left is the safe side in academic and intellectual circles. But it's definitely not the safe side in the rest of society. Society is fairly conservative, and it's only because of the single issue of labour that the left gets many votes at all.

As someone who has shared both left, and right views publicly, I can only say that your experience is bizarre.

The world I live in is dominated by pro-gay, pro-choice, pro-safe-spaces, pro-hate-speech-laws, pro-equaltreatmentofsexesevenifyoupretendyouhaveanewoneeveryday public.

If you look at the big public spaces online as an example (facebook, google, youtube et al) you will find that they lean the safe way, too.

They do it for the same reason you seem to. It's easy.

[pErvinalia]

Yeah, I inhabit the rational and intelligent part of the political spectrum because it's easy. It couldn't possibly be because I think it is the rational and intelligent part of the spectrum.

[Scot Dutchy]

Remember the no name bit.The name tell a lot.

There's been research, mentioned in both the newspapers here and in New Scientist, where job applications were made with typical Anglo names, vs Middle Eastern names. A much higher proportion of the applications with Anglo names were replied to, and interviews invited...

Same thing here, people with Arabic or African soundeing names, or from certain 'overrun' areas do tend to get fewer responses to their job applications than those with good European names (even if those are abviously Portuguese or Italian, who were subject to racism in their own time)and from 'well frequented' districts or towns.

The very same here. Turkish and African names are definitely a draw back. There is a trend for young very intelligent Turkish girls to even change their names officially to Dutch sounding names. They are very westernised. Skin colour is not a problem as there are a lot of Indonesians here for years. Plenty of mixed relationships as well.

[Hermit]

Remember the no name bit.The name tell a lot.

There's been research, mentioned in both the newspapers here and in New Scientist, where job applications were made with typical Anglo names, vs Middle Eastern names. A much higher proportion of the applications with Anglo names were replied to, and interviews invited...

Same thing here, people with Arabic or African soundeing names, or from certain 'overrun' areas do tend to get fewer responses to their job applications than those with good European names (even if those are abviously Portuguese or Italian, who were subject to racism in their own time)and from 'well frequented' districts or towns.

The very same here. Turkish and African names are definitely a draw back. There is a trend for young very intelligent Turkish girls to even change their names officially to Dutch sounding names.

In the Netherlands?

Unbefuckinglievable!

[Scot Dutchy]

There is a conservative streak here amongst employers I am sad to say. The same is true of the Scandinavian countries apparently.

[Forty Two]

Remember the no name bit.The name tell a lot.

There's been research, mentioned in both the newspapers here and in New Scientist, where job applications were made with typical Anglo names, vs Middle Eastern names. A much higher proportion of the applications with Anglo names were replied to, and interviews invited...

Same thing here, people with Arabic or African soundeing names, or from certain 'overrun' areas do tend to get fewer responses to their job applications than those with good European names (even if those are abviously Portuguese or Italian, who were subject to racism in their own time)and from 'well frequented' districts or towns.

I would imagine that's true the world over. I bet Patrick Fitzgerald and John Smith get fewer interviews in Turkey and Nigeria.