Sean Hayden wrote:Do you have a network of spider holes spanning several hundred kilometers? What kind of depth charges is your boat packing in the event of a submarine attack? You didn't think of that one did you?
Come, let us talk preparedness...

Sean Hayden wrote:Do you have a network of spider holes spanning several hundred kilometers? What kind of depth charges is your boat packing in the event of a submarine attack? You didn't think of that one did you?
Come, let us talk preparedness...
Oh, indeed, yes. In rural areas, the people tend to be more self-sufficient, and there is more distance between a catastrophe and starvation, and there are fewer people around to make demands.pErvinalia wrote:In rural areas, cooperation already flourishes, so a disaster would just see a continuation of what is normal. As much as possible. The cities, though, are another matter. In Australia we do see people in cities get together and cooperate in disasters, but these are things that last like a week or so. Push that out to 6 months, and I image the gloves would be off.
Certainly not, because one can ration certain foods for quite a long time. But is a month's worth of food enough for a month? I have about 100 families within a short walk from my front door. What happens when they don't have enough for their kids?NineBerry wrote:Having enough food for a month at home doesn't require much effort. Spending an hour once every year to renew the stash.
Agreed, and people will come together to help each other.Rum wrote:I’ve seen a few disasters. Several major typhoons in Hong Kong and two lots of serious flooding here in Carlisle. Not quite in the collapse of everything as we know it league but totally disruptive. My experience for what it’s worth is that people come together and work for the common good. The community spirit here during the floods which left a good few hundred people homeless was something special.
Of course if it’s you versus another survivor fighting over the last radioactive potatoe in town it might be another matter.
Yeah - I think the red line is when the broadband drops.Sean Hayden wrote:I think there is a lot of opportunity between local flooding and the last radioactive potato for a breakdown of "community" to happen.
Yes I know. There's a great deal of difference. Perhaps the Blitz in London is a better example. There was a real existential threat in those circumstances. A bit of a myth has grown up around the 'Blitz spirit' and there was some of that. But there was also a thriving black market and people looking out for themselves.Forty Two wrote:Agreed, and people will come together to help each other.Rum wrote:I’ve seen a few disasters. Several major typhoons in Hong Kong and two lots of serious flooding here in Carlisle. Not quite in the collapse of everything as we know it league but totally disruptive. My experience for what it’s worth is that people come together and work for the common good. The community spirit here during the floods which left a good few hundred people homeless was something special.
Of course if it’s you versus another survivor fighting over the last radioactive potatoe in town it might be another matter.
It all depends on the disaster. Did the flooding in Carlisle mean people were fending for themselves without power, food or water, and no outside assistance, for a month?
When the overall community is still functioning, but small area of a few hundred people get homeless, the outside folks come in. Like when tornado in the US rips through a town. Sure, bunches of people have their lives devastated, but there is support for them, public and private, when that happens. They don't have forage for food.
What I'm talking about is the true catastrophe the preppers are waiting for.
Rum wrote:Yeah - I think the red line is when the broadband drops.Sean Hayden wrote:I think there is a lot of opportunity between local flooding and the last radioactive potato for a breakdown of "community" to happen.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests