Thank you Conny.Conny wrote:GrahamH,GrahamH wrote: What I know of Griffin's views leaves me deeply unimpressed. He doesn't seem to approach the subject with any rigour or scepticism. I looks at hos stuff a while ago so I can;t quote you something, but I clearly recall seeing his arguments as very weak.
I'm not asking for a book. Just give us a summary of what you think did and did not happen. You can leave the real unknowns out for now. Focus on what you are confident about and could back up with evidence if asked to.
If you really believe the USAgovt version, i'd like to see the evidence for their claims.
What i guess/presume happened is they used some patsies to take airplane lessons, so they could blame them later, got together with the owner of Twin Towers which were asbestos laden and no longer a revenue, slowly had "teams" place the army-made explosives (i am not versed in that stuff) highly insured the buildings, "fortified" a side of the Pentagon with certain missile guidance system, took some remote controlled jets, loaded them with extra explosive charges, re-routed two or three of the jets to Ohio, made them land. (who knows what happened to the passengers? they were forced to make phone calls?)( maybe put them all into the) one jet that got shot down over Pa.?, sent a missile into Pentagon via something that was made to look like a plane. Got people into the right position to say within an hour or so it was done by A-Q. Some decided to make even more money and took out put options on the airplane companies.
I can imagine some readers will say: all speculation, where is the evidence now. BUT that is not what Graham wanted. He wanted me to say what i think happened. So many people are now saying that the mossad had a hand in this whole thing. I wouldn't put it past them, but i wonder WHY- what their motivation to do this would be. So i'd like to remain sceptical on that part.
The arms industry wanted a war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Control over oil and poppy fields and a presence in the region. They needed a reason to go into war. They wrote and re-read Northwoods, they read a novel by an israeli that has this "story line". They probably thought, we control the media, we can pull it off: drone it into the heads of people (Bernays) enough times, and make disbelievers look stupid etc. etc.
What they forget is that the USA universities have (produced) independent thinking - smart people who are not afraid to speak up when they see foul play. Thank goodness.
So, do you claim to have evidence to establish any of these things beyond reasonable doubt?